Geoffrey Young wrote:
+if ($base = $self-{inherit_config}-{ServerRoot}) {
+debug using inherited ServerRoot $base to resolve $file;
+}
+elsif ($base = $self-apxs('PREFIX')) {
+warning using apxs-derived ServerRoot $base to resolve $file;
+}
+
+elsif (file_name_is_absolute($file)) {
Shouldn't the file_name_is_absolute case be first?
indeed - I only noticed that case after I had coded the others.
clearly not enough coffee yet :)
--Geoff
See below for explanation of change; attached diff now correct.
-Norman Tuttle, OpenDemand Systems Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Norman Tuttle wrote:
To Apache Flood development team:
Other than some small touch-ups, these changes to flood_net_ssl.c involve
1) taking
Geoffrey Young wrote:
[...]
+elsif ($base = $self-apxs('PREFIX')) {
+warning using apxs-derived ServerRoot $base to resolve $file;
May be better to say it all?
warning since ServerRoot is not defined, .
using apxs-derived PREFIX $base to resolve $file;
Stas Bekman wrote:
Geoffrey Young wrote:
[...]
+elsif ($base = $self-apxs('PREFIX')) {
+warning using apxs-derived ServerRoot $base to resolve
$file;
May be better to say it all?
warning since ServerRoot is not defined, .
using apxs-derived PREFIX
Geoffrey Young wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
Geoffrey Young wrote:
[...]
+elsif ($base = $self-apxs('PREFIX')) {
+warning using apxs-derived ServerRoot $base to resolve
$file;
May be better to say it all?
warning since ServerRoot is not defined, .
using
and it's an absolute_path.
no sense checking that - rel2abs returns an absolute path by definition.
what if it fails?
the call to rel2abs? since it does no check of the underlying filesystem I
doubt that's realistic.
I'm definitely a fan of error checking where it makes sense, but I also
the call to rel2abs? since it does no check of the underlying
filesystem I doubt that's realistic.
you are right, I've confused with the opposite operation abs2rel, which
may fail if the base doesn't fit.
In any case it's a good idea to check that rel2abs gives you a path that
exists, no?
I'm trying to get rid of ap_get_client_block(), but I don't understand a few
things. ap_get_client_block() asks for readbytes from the upstream filter.
What happens if the filter returns less bytes (while there is still more data
coming?) What happens if the filter returns more bytes than
Hi Matthieu,
We are also seeing the same problem on HP-UX running 2.0.47 with mod_ldap
enabled. We have done some analysis and we think we might have found the
problem.
The cache memory is shared by all processes(one process creates it and other
processes just attaches to it). After a process
Bastiaan van der Put wrote:
CustomLog |/usr/local/apache2/bin/logresolve
/home/accounts/x/x/logs/access_log combined
unless somebody speaks up soon, I'll commit the patch to Apache 2.1-dev
Works now,
When stopping apache i still get
piped log program '/usr/local/apache2/bin/logresolve
Hi Chou,
I dunno if you looked into the patch i pointed in my last mail, but this
is what the patch is doing:
SHM is now initialised in post_config hook, so apr_shm_create and
apr_rmm_init are just called one time when apache is startup.
Then, all the lock are now using the module structure to
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Piras Velandai Thiyagarajan wrote:
To better serve the Apache user community for easy integration, it
would be nice if during configure compilation option,
--with-mod-sun-plugin, that way just be simple effect of compilation,
the customers get what they want.
I'd
when i first started using 2.0.47, i was concerned that mod_rewrite no
longer wrote a visible lockfile when using RewriteLock with an
external map program. i realize there was some type of bug related to
this in 2.0.39 ( 9534 --
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9534 ), which is
hi again
I'm still seeing this error on my local system. since those who tried were
not able to reproduce, I decided to try on cvs.apache.org
hostname
minotaur.apache.org
mkdir src
cd src
cvs -z9 -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/cvspublic checkout
apache-1.3
cvs server: Updating
Jonathan Gold wrote:
i'm not a great C programmer, but i think i understand, from the
comments on the method which creates the mutex, that an actual file is
used only if the operating system needs it to implement the locking.
correct
your Linux build is probably defaulting to SysV semaphores*,
Hi Matthieu,
I was speaking about the actual code we saw in 2.0.47. I will try your patch
and see what happens.
Thanks,
Chou
-Original Message-
From: Matthieu Estrade [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 4:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mod_ldap
indeed it does use APR_USE_SYSVSEM_SERIALIZE. thanks for looking.
jon
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Jonathan Gold wrote:
i'm not a great C programmer, but i think i understand, from the
comments on the method which creates the mutex, that an actual file is
used only if the
18 matches
Mail list logo
