Re: Apache 1.3.28 SEGFAULTS and doesn't produce a core file

2003-11-29 Thread YONETANI Tomokazu
Hello. On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 10:15:29PM -0800, Blair Zajac wrote: > Won't doing something like this work on Linux? > > --- src/main/http_main.c.0 2002-09-27 10:40:24.0 -0700 > +++ src/main/http_main.c2003-06-26 17:11:35.0 -0700 > @@ -123,6 +123,7 @@ > #ifdef HAVE_B

Re: Apache 1.3.28 SEGFAULTS and doesn't produce a core file

2003-11-29 Thread Blair Zajac
Won't doing something like this work on Linux? --- src/main/http_main.c.0 2002-09-27 10:40:24.0 -0700 +++ src/main/http_main.c2003-06-26 17:11:35.0 -0700 @@ -123,6 +123,7 @@ #ifdef HAVE_BSTRING_H #include/* for IRIX, FD_SET calls bzero() */ #endif +#incl

Re: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH snapshots available on cvs.apache.org

2003-11-29 Thread Robert La Ferla
Günter Knauf wrote: but would be fine if we could have _one_ complete archive as snapshot, then you dont have to care about BRANCH, HEAD.. I'm sure lot more people would try to build from cvs if they could get _one_ archive containing all... That has prevented me from building from cvs so I'd l

Re: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH snapshots available on cvs.apache.org

2003-11-29 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On Saturday, November 29, 2003 11:38 PM +0100 Günter Knauf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: But since HEAD is 2.1 I would prefer you rename the HEAD snapshots httpd-2.1_xxx and put them into http://cvs.apache.org/snapshots/httpd-2.1/ and the APACHE_2_0_BRANCH named as httpd-2.0_xxx in http://cvs.apac

Re: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH snapshots available on cvs.apache.org

2003-11-29 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On Saturday, November 29, 2003 10:39 PM +0100 Astrid Keßler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ehm, would you mind to do the same for the httpd-docs-2.0 snapshot? Done. Should be available on the next snapshot (roughly every 6 hours). Yell if it doesn't work. -- justin

Re: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH snapshots available on cvs.apache.org

2003-11-29 Thread Günter Knauf
> On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, Guenter Knauf wrote: >> and then we also need a second APR snapshot for APACHE_2_0_BRANCH, or? > It's AP[RUI]_0_9_BRANCH for apr,apr-util,apr-iconv. And soon to be > AP[RUI]_1_0_BRANCH as well, with HEAD becoming 1.1-dev. hm, some more confusing stuff for people not follo

Re: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH snapshots available on cvs.apache.org

2003-11-29 Thread Robert La Ferla
Günter Knauf wrote: Justin, means that 2.0 snapshots (APACHE_2_0_BRANCH) will be generated alongside the 2.1 snapshots (HEAD). thanks!! But since HEAD is 2.1 I would prefer you rename the HEAD snapshots httpd-2.1_xxx and put them into

Re: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH snapshots available on cvs.apache.org

2003-11-29 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, Günter Knauf wrote: > and then we also need a second APR snapshot for APACHE_2_0_BRANCH, or? It's AP[RUI]_0_9_BRANCH for apr,apr-util,apr-iconv. And soon to be AP[RUI]_1_0_BRANCH as well, with HEAD becoming 1.1-dev. --Cliff

Re: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH snapshots available on cvs.apache.org

2003-11-29 Thread Günter Knauf
Justin, > means that 2.0 snapshots (APACHE_2_0_BRANCH) will be generated alongside > the 2.1 snapshots (HEAD). > thanks!! But since HEAD is 2.1 I would prefer you rename the HEAD snapshots httpd-2.1_xxx and put them into http://cvs.apache.org/snapsh

Re: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH snapshots available on cvs.apache.org

2003-11-29 Thread Astrid Keßler
> I've tweaked cvs.apache.org's snapshot scripts to include branches. This > means that 2.0 snapshots (APACHE_2_0_BRANCH) will be generated alongside the > 2.1 snapshots (HEAD). Great idea. Thank you, Justin. Ehm, would you mind to do the same for the httpd-docs-2.0 snapshot? Kess

APACHE_2_0_BRANCH snapshots available on cvs.apache.org

2003-11-29 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
Hi all, I've tweaked cvs.apache.org's snapshot scripts to include branches. This means that 2.0 snapshots (APACHE_2_0_BRANCH) will be generated alongside the 2.1 snapshots (HEAD). Enjoy! -- justin

Re: piped log files

2003-11-29 Thread Bastiaan van der Put
Been using the patch for a while now on 2.048 The patch was posted on the list on 2003-11-01 by Jeff Trawick. Index: server/log.c === RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-2.0/server/log.c,v retrieving revision 1.135 diff -u -r1.135 log.c --- serv

Re: consider reopening 1.3

2003-11-29 Thread Sander Striker
On Sat, 2003-11-29 at 03:00, Sami Tikka wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > About re-opening 1.3 tree: I'm not sure I understand what is the big > deal. This is open source. You want to work on 1.3, go do it. Your > patches are not getting into ASF repository? Create your own. There are > other