RE: Increasing LimitRequestFieldsize

--On Sunday, August 15, 2004 7:30 PM -0700 "Mathihalli, Madhusudan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I thought the 8K limit was a compile-time constant. 8190 is just our default. HTH. -- justin

Re: Proxy_ajp - build problem - NetWare

Hi, since I doubt we get the apr_socket functions to use apr_byte_t instead of char in the near future, attached the patch for the makefile wich makes the compiler as 'tolerant' as others... Guenter. > Get the following while trying a build on a NetWare platform form CVS 2.1 > HEAD: > Generatin

Re: Proxy_ajp - build problem - NetWare

Hi, > Get the following while trying a build on a NetWare platform form CVS 2.1 > HEAD: > Generating Release\proxyajp_cc.opt > Compiling proxy_ajp.c > Compiling proxy_util.c > Compiling c:\projects\gccnlm\ajplib/ajp_header.c > Compiling c:\projects\gccnlm\ajplib/ajp_msg.c > Compiling c:\projects\gc

RE: Increasing LimitRequestFieldsize

: -Original Message- : From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : : --On Friday, August 13, 2004 10:02 AM -0700 "Mathihalli, Madhusudan" : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: : : > I was wondering if there's any potential harm in increasing the : > LimitRequestFieldsize from it's

Bug report for Apache httpd-2.0 [2004/08/15]

+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Apache httpd-1.3 [2004/08/15]

+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned