: -----Original Message----- : From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : : --On Friday, August 13, 2004 10:02 AM -0700 "Mathihalli, Madhusudan" : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: : : > I was wondering if there's any potential harm in increasing the : > LimitRequestFieldsize from it's current value of 8k to : something more : > (like 32k). : : Instances that need to support larger header sizes can set : the directive, so I don't know why we should make the default : larger. Is there a compelling reason to do so? -- justin
I thought the 8K limit was a compile-time constant. -Madhu
