This mostly means that mod_smtpd is very close to completion. I expect
some bug-fixes and I plan on adding a one-recipient/one-transaction
feature and a message body reading abstraction, but other than that it
seems to be in its final working state. Features include:
Thanks for the update
At 04:16 PM 8/29/2005, Nick Kew wrote:
On Monday 29 August 2005 21:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: wrowe
Date: Mon Aug 29 13:12:43 2005
New Revision: 264623
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=264623view=rev
Log:
Correct mod_cgid's argv[0] so that the full path can be delved by
Hi,
I have posted many queries to Apache users mailing list but has not got
any answers till now. I need to desperately get this issue solved.
The issue is this:
We are having Apache (version 2.0.54) installed as a forward
proxy on RHEL 3.0.
Downloads fail more often than
On 8/30/05, Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I counted two votes about 2.1.7-beta:
+1: Brad, Joe
No one else put votes in the thread.
+1, with a strong concern that the non-showstopper issues are highlighted
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 11:12:24AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
%{tid}P gets you thread id in decimal now.
%{hextid}P would show it in hex using relatively new apr_sprintf()
format, added in 1.2.0.
Seems fine except that it introduces a softish dependency on apr =
1.2.0 which is not enforced by
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 09:58:12PM -0700, Paul Querna wrote:
We did find several non-showstopper issues with this tag. If anyone has
a few spare minutes, it would be good to start back porting these from
trunk to the 2.2.x branch.
http://people.apache.org/~colm/2.1.7-non-showstoppers.patch
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 01:01:40PM +0100, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 09:58:12PM -0700, Paul Querna wrote:
We did find several non-showstopper issues with this tag. If anyone has
a few spare minutes, it would be good to start back porting these from
trunk to the 2.2.x
On 8/30/05, Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 01:01:40PM +0100, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 09:58:12PM -0700, Paul Querna wrote:
We did find several non-showstopper issues with this tag. If anyone has
a few spare minutes, it would be good to
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 08:24:17AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/stopping.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/stopping.xml?rev=264737r1=264736r2=264737view=diff
Are there any comments on this? If not then I would like to make the type
name changes in trunk and then push them back into the 2.2 branch. I don't
consider this a show-stopper for the 2.1.7-beta candidate but the conflict does
need to be resolved before 2.2 is released.
Brad
On
I needed the following patch to get one of my modules to build:
--- /usr/local/asf/include/mod_smtpd.h.orig Mon Aug 29 16:03:40 2005
+++ /usr/local/asf/include/mod_smtpd.h Mon Aug 29 16:03:55 2005
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
#include apr_pools.h
#include apr_hash.h
#include apr_file_io.h
+#include
This past week I have finished up a few modules and ready for review.
http://www.brianfrance.com/software/apache/mod_smtpd_load.tar.gz
mod_smtpd_load:
This module allows rejecting connection (temporarily) based on server
load
It is not very cross platform (any os with getloadavg), but I am
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 02:27:20PM +0100, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 08:24:17AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
module=mpm_commonPidFile/directive and cease listening on
all ports. The parent will continue to run, and monitor children
which are handling
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 05:25:07PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
This has all sorts of consequences, the most annoying of which is that
both stop and graceful-stop actually won't kill CGI processes when
using a threaded MPM/cgid.
So is mod_cgid still the default CGI module for worker because
Joe Orton wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 01:01:40PM +0100, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 09:58:12PM -0700, Paul Querna wrote:
We did find several non-showstopper issues with this tag. If anyone has
a few spare minutes, it would be good to start back porting these from
Hi,
Sai Jai Ganesh Gurubaran wrote:
[..cut..]
Error log:
-
The error log does not show anything in 2.0.54.
Using 2.0.48, we get
[notice] child pid 20653 exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
and
[Fri Aug 12 15:02:51 2005] [notice] child pid 431 exit signal
At 05:22 AM 8/30/2005, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 8/30/05, Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I counted two votes about 2.1.7-beta:
+1: Brad, Joe
No one else put votes in the thread.
+1, with a strong concern that the non-showstopper issues are highlighted
Whoops - missed the word 'beta' :)
Author: jerenkrantz
Date: Tue Aug 30 14:21:18 2005
New Revision: 264866
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=264866view=rev
Log:
mod_cgid: Refuse to work on Solaris 10 due to OS bugs.
PR: 34264
[..cut..]
+This means that threaded MPMs (such as worker MPM) with CGIs will not work.
Hi,
Attached, a small patch adding mod_mbox documentation to the HTTPd
manual. I'm new to Apache HTTPd docs and I hope I did not forgot
anything.
Review on grammar and syntax are welcome, I'm not a native english
speaker :)
Regards,
- Sam
--
Maxime Petazzoni (http://www.bulix.org)
-- gone
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 06:00:47PM +0100, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 05:25:07PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
This has all sorts of consequences, the most annoying of which is that
both stop and graceful-stop actually won't kill CGI processes when
using a threaded
--On August 30, 2005 11:33:39 PM +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just curious. What about running the worker MPM with mod_cgi on Solaris
10? See also the discussion on
Re: svn commit: r264737 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/stopping.xml
between Colm and Joe.
Saw it; but I don't have time to
--On August 29, 2005 9:58:12 PM -0700 Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I counted two votes about 2.1.7-beta:
+1: Brad, Joe
Passes httpd-test on Mac OS X 10.4.2.
+1 for beta. -- justin
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
[..cut..]
Saw it; but I don't have time to test that myself. For now, I want to
ensure that we don't allow people to shoot themselves in the foot
out-of-the-box. =) -- justin
The Pascal compiler approach: The compiler won't let you shoot yourself in the
foot.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 04:22:33PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I'm concerned about a number of significant instability reports
on 2.0.x, never mind 2.1.x, in bugzilla, and don't think this
is quite ready to ship.
For what it's worth I consider the trunk branch more stable than 2.0.x.
--On August 30, 2005 8:54:57 AM -0400 Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~colm/2.1.7-non-showstoppers.patch
+1 on all that for the 2.2.x branch in any case.
+1 here as well
+1 too on that set of changes. I think we hit RTC once the branch opens
towards GA -
--On August 30, 2005 10:46:01 PM +0100 Colm MacCarthaigh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Since Apachecon EU, it's also been running the worker MPM (on IA64). and
performance is up by around 9% in our benchmarks. In trunk's STATUS
there's a vote which seems have long since passed (positively) to make
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 10:37:07PM +0100, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 06:00:47PM +0100, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 05:25:07PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
This has all sorts of consequences, the most annoying of which is that
both stop and
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 02:47:05PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On August 30, 2005 8:54:57 AM -0400 Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~colm/2.1.7-non-showstoppers.patch
+1 on all that for the 2.2.x branch in any case.
+1 here as well
+1 too on that
Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
[..cut..]
Since Apachecon EU, it's also been running the worker MPM (on IA64). and
performance is up by around 9% in our benchmarks. In trunk's STATUS
Just curious. So you switched from your prefork configuration that was presented
during your Apachecon EU session
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 11:54:04PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since Apachecon EU, it's also been running the worker MPM (on IA64). and
performance is up by around 9% in our benchmarks. In trunk's STATUS
Just curious. So you switched from your prefork configuration that was
presented
Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 11:54:04PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[..cut..]
Yep, and it's faster, by about 9%. We've also done some other crazy
things;
What is the ThreadsPerChild setting you use?
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 12:10:33AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep, and it's faster, by about 9%. We've also done some other crazy
things;
What is the ThreadsPerChild setting you use?
currently using;
IfModule worker.c
ServerLimit 900
StartServers200
MaxClients
Brad Nicholes wrote:
Are there any comments on this? If not then I would like
to make the type name changes in trunk and then push them back
into the 2.2 branch. I don't consider this a show-stopper for
the 2.1.7-beta candidate but the conflict does need to be
resolved before 2.2 is
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 05:22 AM 8/30/2005, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 8/30/05, Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I counted two votes about 2.1.7-beta:
+1: Brad, Joe
No one else put votes in the thread.
+1, with a strong concern that the non-showstopper issues are highlighted
At 04:46 PM 8/30/2005, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
Since Apachecon EU, it's also been running the worker MPM (on IA64). and
performance is up by around 9% in our benchmarks. In trunk's STATUS
there's a vote which seems have long since passed (positively) to make
worker the default MPM.
Is this
At 07:40 PM 8/30/2005, Paul Querna wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
So -1 here from the peanut gallery on beta for this candidate,
simply because most devs didn't feel strongly enough to endorse
this beta over the last week+. Let's see if we can't find a
candidate that folks endorse more
At 04:22 PM 8/30/2005, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 05:22 AM 8/30/2005, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 8/30/05, Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I counted two votes about 2.1.7-beta:
+1: Brad, Joe
Whoops - missed the word 'beta' :)
So -1 here from the peanut gallery on beta for this candidate,
Ok, let's start again. mod_mbox is not in the HTTPd core, so its
documentation does not belong to the httpd/httpd/docs/ part of the
repository.
Attached, a small patch adding a stub website for mod_mbox to the
httpd/site/ directory.
Module's documentation will come afterwards (I still have some
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 09:10:25PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
If folks aren't voting, will they be supporting the problem reports
that come in?
I count the following for 2.1.7 beta (Paul missed a bunch of votes):
+1: Joe, Brad, Jeff, Jim, Justin.
-1: OtherBill ('no one voted')
How
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 04:36:59AM +0200, Maxime Petazzoni wrote:
Ok, let's start again. mod_mbox is not in the HTTPd core, so its
documentation does not belong to the httpd/httpd/docs/ part of the
repository.
Attached, a small patch adding a stub website for mod_mbox to the
httpd/site/
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 11:28:37AM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 11:12:24AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
%{tid}P gets you thread id in decimal now.
%{hextid}P would show it in hex using relatively new apr_sprintf()
format, added in 1.2.0.
Seems fine except that it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: colm
Date: Tue Aug 30 07:28:48 2005
New Revision: 264788
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=264788view=rev
Log:
If uid_t and gid_t are unsigned on a platform (hurd, for example), using -1
may cause a compiler warning.
Why are we re-inventing APR in
Hi,
I've adjusted your commit privs to be able to commit to the site
repository. (All committers to any httpd project are supposed to be
able to commit there.)
Thanks, it will be easier for me to commit the documentation.
After committing, log into people.apache.org, ensure your umask is
On Wednesday 31 August 2005 03:38, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 09:10:25PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
If folks aren't voting, will they be supporting the problem reports
that come in?
I count the following for 2.1.7 beta (Paul missed a bunch of votes):
+1: Joe,
44 matches
Mail list logo
