[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-77?page=comments#action_12322710
]
Graham Dumpleton commented on MODPYTHON-77:
---
I worked out what was going on a few days ago, but first time with Internet
access since. :-(
I agree that what is
I've been away this weekend - just got back, but I'm too busy to try to
read all the multiple-interpreter related comments. I guess my question is
- can someone provide a quick summary of how far we are from 3.2.1b test
tarbal?
Thanks!
Grisha
On Thu, 1 Sep 2005, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
Well, if I've understood Jim's mail, apart from the new MODPYTHON-77, we're all set.
Regards,
Nicolas2005/9/6, Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've been away this weekend - just got back, but I'm too busy to try toread all the multiple-interpreter related comments. I guess my
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
I've been away this weekend - just got back, but I'm too busy to try to
read all the multiple-interpreter related comments. I guess my question
is - can someone provide a quick summary of how far we are from 3.2.1b
test tarbal?
I've also been away for the
On Tue, 6 Sep 2005, Jim Gallacher wrote:
As Graham stated on the weekend, the use of thread states can be very
tricky. I think we should proceed with the 3.2.1b without the fix. That way
we can take the time to make sure we understand the issues and fix it in 3.3.
If that seems reasonable,
Hello,
when I try to use
my $req = APR::Request::Apache2-handle($r);
my $f = $req-upload('file');
I get the following error in the error log:
[Tue Sep 06 19:09:10 2005] [error] Can't locate
auto/APR/Request/Apache2/upload.al in @INC (@INC contains: d:/sites/lib
d:/sites/cgi-bin D:/Sites/Perl/lib
Joe Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nikolay Ananiev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
when I try to use
my $req = APR::Request::Apache2-handle($r);
my $f = $req-upload('file');
Hmm, so far there's no upload() method in APR::Request.
Ah, oops. It is available after all:
On Tuesday 06 September 2005 06:10, Brian Pane wrote:
http://www.brianp.net/work/opensource/apache/async.html
Shouldn't there be a transition from HANDLER to CHECK_REQUEST_LINE_READABLE in
case the full response is sent and keep-alive is on?
Torsten
pgpGwArqwD7oI.pgp
Description: PGP
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
This means that both create_server_config and create_dir_config
function *are always* called on LoadModule, before module's
pre_config hook is called.
Is this a correct behavior?
I need to relook at the code, but it's my recall that what that
Mladen Turk wrote:
Well, seems that those two functions are called before pre_config even
from Apache 1.3, so seems that functions are called, not stored.
This implicates that your patch for balancer *should* move external
hook loading in the pre_config, and that the hook in balancer is
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
BTW, when you are testing those patches on nix, do you use static or
dynamic modules?
Both. Plus, as I said, Bill Rowe also tested under Win32 and
got no errors at all.
Can you ask him to send me the binaries.
I'm feeling quite puzzled.
I would
Mladen Turk wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
BTW, when you are testing those patches on nix, do you use static or
dynamic modules?
Both. Plus, as I said, Bill Rowe also tested under Win32 and
got no errors at all.
Can you ask him to send me the binaries.
Mladen Turk wrote:
I was wondering, if you add:
static const char *const aszSucc[] = { mod_proxy.c, NULL};
to ap_proxy_balancer_register_hook(), and then adjust the
following line to look like this:
proxy_hook_load_lbmethods(add_lbmethods, aszSucc, NULL, APR_HOOK_FIRST);
Does it
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I was wondering, if you add:
static const char *const aszSucc[] = { mod_proxy.c, NULL};
to ap_proxy_balancer_register_hook(), and then adjust the
following line to look like this:
proxy_hook_load_lbmethods(add_lbmethods, aszSucc, NULL, APR_HOOK_FIRST);
Does it
Mladen Turk wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I was wondering, if you add:
static const char *const aszSucc[] = { mod_proxy.c, NULL};
to ap_proxy_balancer_register_hook(), and then adjust the
following line to look like this:
proxy_hook_load_lbmethods(add_lbmethods,
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Sorry but not.
Same thing; 'add_lbmethods' is never called because it is called from
create_server_config that OTOH is called before mod_proxy_balancer is
loaded by the LoadModule.
Strange... Because c_s_c is actually called *multiple* times during the
actual load and
Mladen Turk wrote:
Look Jim, not sure how can I explain that to you, but here is what
happens:
1. LoadModule mod_proxy
create_server_config
tries to load the function from proxy_load_balancer
2. LoadModule mod_proxy_balancer
So, c_s_c from mod_proxy is referencing the
Jim Jagielski wrote:
[Tue Sep 06 20:03:05 2005] [debug] mod_proxy_balancer.c(41): proxy:
BALANCER: canonicalising URL //cluster//servlet-examples/
[Tue Sep 06 20:03:06 2005] [notice] child pid 3455 exit signal
Segmentation fault (11)
So, this is 2.1.7-beta from pquerna.
Weird that no one
Mladen Turk wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
[Tue Sep 06 20:03:05 2005] [debug] mod_proxy_balancer.c(41): proxy:
BALANCER: canonicalising URL //cluster//servlet-examples/
[Tue Sep 06 20:03:06 2005] [notice] child pid 3455 exit signal
Segmentation fault (11)
So, this is 2.1.7-beta from
Can anyone else recreate the core dumps that Mladen is seeing with
the balancer in 2.1.7-beta? The httpd-test perl framework has a simple
test for it.
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|]
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Can anyone else recreate the core dumps that Mladen is seeing with
the balancer in 2.1.7-beta? The httpd-test perl framework has a simple
test for it.
I can confirm Mladens core dumps. I used the latest revision from svn
and did the following:
./configure
Hmmm My tests have all been http:
Proxy balancer://foo
BalancerMember http://www.google.com:80 loadfactor=1
ProxySet lbmethod=bytraffic
/Proxy
ProxyPass /bat/ balancer://foo/
Weird... Thanks for the feedback!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Can anyone else recreate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Folks,
I have been meaning to follow up on this ever since that BOF, and am
deeply annoyed that it has taken me this long.
As a matter of fact, my memory of that BOF session has now faded to a
considerable extent and I don't feel comfortable
Hold on a tic... it seems to be related to
whether or not it's within a Vhost...
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Hold on a tic... it seems to be related to
whether or not it's within a Vhost...
I can confirm this Jim. Once I use
VirtualHost 127.0.0.1:80
Proxy balancer://cluster
BalancerMember ajp://localhost:8009
/Proxy
ProxyPass /servlet-examples/
Sander Temme wrote:
For maximum compatibility, this tool would have
to be written in C. Currently, apxs is a Perl program but you can't
always count on the availability of Perl on the system, especially on
Windows. The apxs++ tool would be available only when mod_so is available.
Sorry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Hold on a tic... it seems to be related to
whether or not it's within a Vhost...
I think this is the solution as for each virtual host the create_server_config
is run for this virtual host again *after* all modules have been loaded. Thus it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Hold on a tic... it seems to be related to
whether or not it's within a Vhost...
I think this is the solution as for each virtual host the create_server_config
is run for this virtual host again *after*
On Sep 5, 2005, at 3:15 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
Ryan Morgan wrote:
require ldap-group cn=Engineering,ou=Groups,o=SomeCompany,c=US
require ldap-group cn=QA,ou=Groups,o=SomeCompany,c=US
satisfy all
Could someone provide feedback on whether this is a feature that
could be
added
Sander Temme wrote:
One aspect of TCAHMAN that I hadn't covered in my original discussion
is how to add modules from the repository to an existing Apache
install. This would require a program, installed with the server, that
can fetch the module code and run the build/install. We have
On Tue, 6 Sep 2005, Sander Temme wrote:
Folks,
I have been meaning to follow up on this ever since that BOF, and am deeply
annoyed that it has taken me this long.
As a matter of fact, my memory of that BOF session has now faded to a
considerable extent and I don't feel comfortable even
31 matches
Mail list logo
