Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
> -0 on SuSE Linux 10.1 x86_64, gcc 4.1.0
>
> Due to the apr-util bug 41308
> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41308) the 64 bit
> build does not work if a system wide 32 bit expat library is present.
Can you clarify - if you specific --with-builtin-exp
On 01/06/2007 08:41 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ will soon (within the hour, upon resync)
> contain the following tarballs for approval
>
> httpd-2.2.4.tar.bz2 [.asc|.md5]
.asc / .md5 OK
> httpd-2.2.4.tar.gz [.asc|.md5]
.asc / .md5 OK
+1 on Solaris 8 /
Hello,
I'm a newbie apache coder, so I apologize in advance for any mistake or
oversight :-)
I've coded this small patch to avoid the ugly hack of having to write
rules such as
RewriteRule .* /index.cgi?
to tell mod_rewrite "forget the QS" and thus provide greater consistency
in the flags "API
I only building with the IDE, it embeds the manifests auto.
For a command-line build I should advise:
Do not clutter the makefiles with specific VC2005 stuff,
but use a .bat file to embed the manifests, so no external manifest files:
manifestVC2005.bat
mt -manifest ab.exe.manifest -outputresou
On Jan 6, 2007, at 1:48 PM, Patrick Welche wrote:
/*
* Validate a plaintext password against a smashed one. Uses either
* crypt() (if available) or apr_md5_encode() or apr_sha1_base64(),
depending
* upon the format of the smashed input password. Returns
APR_SUCCESS if
* they match, or A
where exactly did you add this in the Makefile?
After some searching it does seem that the errors I' mgetting are related
to
missing or wrong manifest files.
Line 608 of /Makefile.win.
Then prepare the environment and build with "nmake -f Makefile.win PORT=80
INSTDIR="x:\path" installr"
You
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Gustavo Lopes wrote:
>> No problems compiling (with openssl0.9.8d and zlib1.2.3) with visual
>> studio 2005 from the command line, except for the usual trouble with the
>> manifest files.
>
> What trouble? All the libraries/exe's have a post build step that does this
Gustavo Lopes wrote:
> No problems compiling (with openssl0.9.8d and zlib1.2.3) with visual
> studio 2005 from the command line, except for the usual trouble with the
> manifest files.
What trouble? All the libraries/exe's have a post build step that does this.
Going back to a virgin unpack of t
Only meant to help ASF with testing by much ppl as possible.
It is not on the (official) download page of the Apachelounge.
I stated to advise ASF, it's a RC and not released by ASF.
When I follow your advise: "... add the binaries to your ApacheLounge
***after*** the vote to release was talli
I was just trying 4 Jan 20:33 -head httpd, with apr/apr-util of 28 Dec,
to try out mod_authn_dbd with the following configuration:
DBDriver pgsql
DBDParams "dbname=passtest user=prlw1"
AuthType Basic
AuthName "What's this?"
AuthBasicProvider dbd
Require valid-user
AuthDBDUserPWQuery "select pref
where exactly did you add this in the Makefile?
After some searching it does seem that the errors I' mgetting are related to
missing or wrong manifest files.
On 1/6/07, Gustavo Lopes <"mail:Apache"@geleia.net> wrote:
No problems compiling (with openssl0.9.8d and zlib1.2.3) with visual
studio
20
I'll give it another whack later today but from IDE this time.
I'll keep you posted
On 1/6/07, Gustavo Lopes <"mail:Apache"@geleia.net> wrote:
No problems compiling (with openssl0.9.8d and zlib1.2.3) with visual
studio
2005 from the command line, except for the usual trouble with the manifest
f
Very true. Steffan, in order to be a community player, we prefer that
you do NOT publish unreleased binaries unless you VERY CLEARLY designate
them as YOUR release of the ASF's code. Even at that, it's in poor form.
Because you participate here, you'll see the vote tally and know when we
start t
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ will soon (within the hour, upon resync)
contain the following tarballs for approval
httpd-2.2.4.tar.bz2 [.asc|.md5]
httpd-2.2.4.tar.gz [.asc|.md5]
httpd-2.2.4-win32-src.zip [.asc|.md5]
+/-1
[ ] Release httpd 2.2.4
Builds clean
No problems compiling (with openssl0.9.8d and zlib1.2.3) with visual studio
2005 from the command line, except for the usual trouble with the manifest
files.
Adding:
$(MAKE) $(MAKEOPT) -f Makefile.win SHORT=$(SHORT) LONG=$(LONG) \
_copybin src_exe=exe.manifest src_dll=dll.manifest src_so=so.man
I added "expected" to the text.
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Trawick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 16:50
Subject: Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review
On 1/6/07, Steffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Builds fine with Visual Studi
On 1/6/07, Steffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Builds fine with Visual Studio 2005 Service Pack 1
It is available with SSL at the Apache Lounge:
http://www.apachelounge.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1237
one note: if 2.2.4 proves to be a dud over the next few days, it won't
be "released" by the AS
On 1/6/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ will soon (within the hour, upon resync)
contain the following tarballs for approval
httpd-2.2.4.tar.bz2 [.asc|.md5]
httpd-2.2.4.tar.gz [.asc|.md5]
httpd-2.2.4-win32-src.zip [.asc|.md5]
for y'alls read
Builds fine with Visual Studio 2005 Service Pack 1
It is available with SSL at the Apache Lounge:
http://www.apachelounge.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1237
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 8:41
Subject:
On 1/5/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&sortby=date&revision=104019
Sanity check... 1.3 used /bin/sh in-between httpd and the piped logger.
4513 execve("/bin/sh", ["/bin/sh", "-c",
"/scratch/inst/13/bin/rotatelogs "...], [/* 36 vars */
Doesn't seem to work for me. Compiles without errors just the regular
warnings.
But when I try to run any of the binaries I get:
http://img142.imageshack.us/img142/7573/errorvs2005jp1.jpg
I'm using visual studio 2005 as always. Following the same steps I've been
doing since 2.2.0
I tried with an
21 matches
Mail list logo
