C++ and apache development

Hi, If I would like to use c++ to write dynamic web server applications, what is the best resource for me that I can use with apache? I believe I have the following options: 1. apache module like mod_php or mod_perl 2. application server that interacts with apache like tomcat 3. CGI 4. FastCGI

-T commandline argument for 2.0.x

Please have a look at bug/patch: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41887 This is my first ever contribution to an OS project of such, and therefore I'd like to know the chances of getting this patch in the main tree. If I need to alter the patch for this to happen, let me

Re: -T commandline argument for 2.0.x

On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 12:06:03 +0100 Jan van den Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please have a look at bug/patch: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41887 This is my first ever contribution to an OS project of such, and therefore I'd like to know the chances of getting

Re: mod_cgid and accept() loop

On 3/18/07, Amol Dev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just have to make sure the daemon will be relaunched taking on requests without problem if that happens. Yes (not tested exactly like that however). Certainly the cgid daemon would be relaunched if it crashed.

Re: [RFC] Guide to writing output filters

Thanks a lot for the review! On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 04:30:24PM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote: Some comments from my side: - Passing empty brigades: While I agree that a filter should never create an empty brigade and pass it down the chain, I think it actually should pass an empty

Re: mod_proxy patches

On Mar 16, 2007, at 8:52 AM, Mathias Herberts wrote: I agree that reusing the backend connections can be a good thing, but there are times when this is just not a very good idea. I agree that there are times when having a single-shot connection is better than having a pool. It's certainly

RE: -T commandline argument for 2.0.x

Hi, Thanks for the advise; I also added a patch for the current trunk (updated 'bug' report). Interesting fact you brought up about mass virtual hosting. I was thinking about this and theoretically I could write a module to handle this. With all my vh info stored in a database. This module would

Re: mod_proxy patches

Jim Jagielski wrote: On Mar 16, 2007, at 8:52 AM, Mathias Herberts wrote: I agree that reusing the backend connections can be a good thing, but there are times when this is just not a very good idea. I agree that there are times when having a single-shot connection is better than having a

Re: [RFC] Guide to writing output filters

Again, thanks for the review! On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 07:44:02AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote: I guess I'm confused about the up/down direction convention for output filters? I thought passing the next output filter is down and returning to the prior input filter is up? My confusion - I always

RE: -T commandline argument for 2.0.x

http://www.outoforder.cc/projects/apache/mod_vhost_dbi/ This looks exactly like what I was talking about. -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Jan van den Berg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: maandag 19 maart 2007 15:47 Aan: dev@httpd.apache.org Onderwerp: RE: -T commandline

Re: [RFC] Guide to writing output filters

On 03/19/2007 03:06 PM, Joe Orton wrote: Thanks a lot for the review! On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 04:30:24PM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote: Some comments from my side: - Passing empty brigades: While I agree that a filter should never create an empty brigade and pass it down the chain, I

Input Needed on Bug 38515

I'm determined to push through a patch for Bug 38515 - Dynamic LDAP Group Support, but I could use some input regarding the recommended approach. I've outlined a basic plan on the bug page (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38515) and would appreciate any comments more