+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
You know, I often think of offering this from my own consulting company;
but I often wonder what exactly it entails... It worries me that I'd be
inviting myself to get sued for a bug that already e4xists in Apache,
whether or not I'm able to get it subsequently fit. Would it be asking
too much
On 6/18/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
One major issue is;
http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/archive/1/459847/100/0/threaded
where MS's response was entirely unsatisfactory w.r.t. POSIX compliance.
Does MS ever follow standards? I know most
Issac Goldstand wrote:
You know, I often think of offering this from my own consulting company;
but I often wonder what exactly it entails... It worries me that I'd be
inviting myself to get sued for a bug that already e4xists in Apache,
whether or not I'm able to get it subsequently fit.
---BeginMessage---
PMCs, please send this announcement to your various users@ and devs@
mailing lists, as appropriate for your particular community.
Remember, your project can only be represented at OS Summit Asia if
your community submits talks proposals:
Call for
On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 17:40 +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 05/21/2007 02:44 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The logic should be:
1. If a per-worker value is set, use that.
2. If not, then if a ProxyTimeout value is set, use that.
3. Otherwise, use Timeout
+1 on fixing
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jean-Frederic
Gesendet: Montag, 18. Juni 2007 12:06
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: ProxyTimeout does not work as documented
On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 17:40 +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Digging somewhat deeper to actually do this I
Hi All,
I'm very interested in this thread. I have two patches I'd like to toss
into the ring as incentive for more discussion on this subject. They
both go the openssl ENGINE + engine_pkcs11 route that Dan has described.
They are generally applicable and are being used to integrate with the
I'm trying to build flood and I keep getting the following error while
trying to do the ./configure.
Apr-util configure properly
Checking for strtoll. no
Checking strtoq. no
Checking for rand. no
Checking for lrand48. no
Checking for random. no
Checking random number generator to use.
Scratch that, I somehow missed the errors in my review in the config.log.
Found the issue, just a missing library.
Matthew Devine
_
From: Matthew Devine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 12:04 PM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Won't Configure on Fedora 6
10 matches
Mail list logo
