Hi,
I'm one of the Debian maintainers of the libapache2-mod-python package.
Could someone please take a look at the report filed here?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=433038
The user writes,
If libapache2-mod-python is installed together with libapache2-mod-php5,
On 31/08/2007, Robert Edmonds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
In 411487 it mentions:
So, it seems it's directly related to libmhash2 (as [2] suggests).
Disabling of mhash module may not be enough if one of the other PHP
modules they list in 433038 also use libmhash2
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Please check out the updated mime.types file and, if possible, see
if it breaks anything on a real site.
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/conf/mime.types
Technically, it is docs, but I am blurry-eyed at the moment and need
to do *something* for my
On Aug 30, 2007, at 11:28 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Please check out the updated mime.types file and, if possible, see
if it breaks anything on a real site.
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/conf/
mime.types
Technically, it is docs, but I am
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 06:24:55PM +0200, Rainer Jung wrote:
The patch replaces the memcmp by a strcmp to check for the trailing
NIL character, too.
For mod_jk the problem you found here is the same. Thanks for finding it!
We finally applied a slightly different patch, by keeping the
From the 2.2.x STATUS doc:
* mod_authn_dbd: Export any additional columns queried in the SQL select
into the environment with the name AUTHENTICATE_COLUMN. This brings
mod_authn_dbd behaviour in line with mod_authnz_ldap.
Trunk:
On Fri, August 31, 2007 12:41 pm, Martin Kraemer wrote:
From the 2.2.x STATUS doc:
* mod_authn_dbd: Export any additional columns queried in the SQL
select
into the environment with the name AUTHENTICATE_COLUMN. This brings
mod_authn_dbd behaviour in line with mod_authnz_ldap.
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 04:32:32PM +0100, Mark Drayton wrote:
...
Issue #40064 has a patch for Apache 2.2 which changes etag_ulong_to_hex() to
etag_uint64_to_hex() and avoids casting the mtime to an (arch-dependent)
unsigned long. We can't move to 2.2 at the moment so instead I patched
2.0.59
On Aug 31, 2007, at 5:11 AM, Martin Kraemer wrote:
Please go for obvious algorithms, or simply automate them (as in
the example macro above) rather than coding in assembler code for
efficiency, dropping even the slightest trace of explanation what
the code is intended to do, and leaving
On Aug 30, 2007, at 8:31 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
My intent is to TR all 3 tomorrow (Friday, the 31st) with
a potential announcement Wednesday, Sept 5th. This is
because Monday is a holiday in the states, so that means
mostly a 3 day weekend for most people...
Due to some last minute
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 10:32:56AM -0700, Chris Darroch wrote:
I think you're right about the problem you're encountering;
the patches for 2.2.x await a third vote and so they're not in
expected in 2.2.5/6, as it stands at the moment.
I am using the trunk version of mod_dbd.c with 2.2.4
Hi,
In order for URLs proxied using RewriteRule with the P-flag to benefit from
proxy worker connection pools, I have experimented a modification of mod_proxy
that implicitly creates a new worker whenever no worker is found for a request.
The patch below is against proxy_util.c of Apache
On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 12:54:44PM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
Here's a patch to eliminate the 13, and to improve portability to
EBCDIC machines by using apr_toupper().
Thanks for this - the fooness really needed to be sorted out before it was
rolled out over the other authn mechanisms.
On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 05:09:34PM +0200, Martin Kraemer wrote:
Should I commit, or do you?
Forgot to mention that I meant: commit to trunk.
For 2.2.x, I'd prefer you do it.
Martin
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| Fujitsu Siemens
http://www.fujitsu-siemens.com/imprint.html | 81730
Is it still fair for me to think this patch will be backported to the
new 2.0.61 AKA 'old' 2.0.60 (because of APR issues) or should I hold out
for 2.0.62? (sounds like a rhetorical question)
Also since I'm new to the development/release cycle used on this list, I
was wondering if there are other
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 31. August 2007 16:02
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Apache 2.2.x: Implicit creation of new proxy_workers
Hi,
In order for URLs proxied using RewriteRule with the P-flag
On Aug 31, 2007, at 12:20 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 31. August 2007 16:02
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Apache 2.2.x: Implicit creation of new proxy_workers
Hi,
In
On 30.08.2007, at 15:02, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Yes, the CHANGES file will be updated to reflect any
and all security issues for that release...
And can someone please also update the NOTICE file to carry the new
copyright date? We are near to the end of 2007 and the file still
says 2006;
18 matches
Mail list logo
