Graham Leggett wrote:
Martin Kraemer wrote:
Here's a patch to eliminate the 13, and to improve portability to
EBCDIC machines by using apr_toupper().
Some of this fooness here revolves around charset issues, something I am
not clear on for many platforms.
The first question is, what is
Nick Kew wrote:
ObPedant:
14:42:30 2007 @@ -113,8 +113,8 @@
/* we break the URL into host, port, uri */
if (APR_SUCCESS != apr_uri_parse_hostinfo(p, url, uri)) {
-return ap_proxyerror(r, HTTP_BAD_REQUEST,
- apr_pstrcat(p, URI cannot be parsed: , url,
NULL));
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=571927view=rev
Log:
* There is no context location. But this directive should in .htaccess files.
I used OR_LIMIT, which I understand to be in directory and location
sections only.
The thinking was that the administrator might
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ rpluem says: Without r571927 the documentation for mod_authn_dbd fails
+ to build.
I found that while trying to write the documentation, Firefox refused to
parse the XML file at the start, complaining about the nbsp; non
breaking space
* Graham Leggett wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ rpluem says: Without r571927 the documentation for mod_authn_dbd
fails + to build.
I found that while trying to write the documentation, Firefox refused to
parse the XML file at the start, complaining about the nbsp;
On 09/02/2007 02:22 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=571927view=rev
Log:
* There is no context location. But this directive should in .htaccess
files.
I used OR_LIMIT, which I understand to be in directory and location
sections
André Malo wrote:
Is nbsp; valid in XML?
Given the proper Doctype, sure.
However, firefox refuses a lot. This does not mean it's not valid. The char
entity problem is well-known, but invalid (firefox only uses DTDs out of
the chrome scheme, for whatever reason). The doc build system
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
From include/http_config.h:
#define OR_LIMIT 1»· /** *.conf inside Directory or Location
»···»···»···»···and .htaccess when AllowOverride Limit */
Ok this makes sense - the directive is still under the administrator's
control, so this works.
Regards,
Graham
--
Hi all,
I've been quietly hacking away at getting UDP support working with
trunk (prefork/unix only, for starters). While I had a decent amount of
success, I eventually got stuck: my original naive plan had been to
poll, recvfrom (to get peer address), dup the socket, connect the dup-ed
As I hit send on that last email, it occurred to me that another,
possibly more elegant, solution would be to patch the core_input and
core_output filters to use recvfrom and sendto if a non-stream socket is
detected. In that case, I think the what needs to be done is to modify
the core
* Graham Leggett wrote:
André Malo wrote:
Is nbsp; valid in XML?
Given the proper Doctype, sure.
However, firefox refuses a lot. This does not mean it's not valid. The
char entity problem is well-known, but invalid (firefox only uses DTDs
out of the chrome scheme, for whatever
On Sep 2, 2007, at 5:24 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is nbsp; valid in XML?
The answer is complicated. One approach is to use #xA0; which is
kinda ugly but works in lots more places. -T
On 02.09.2007, at 17:06, Tim Bray wrote:
On Sep 2, 2007, at 5:24 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is nbsp; valid in XML?
The answer is complicated. One approach is to use #xA0; which is
kinda ugly but works in lots more places. -T
Yep, quite complicated - it has to
André Malo wrote:
Is there a particular reason, that you changed the public context instead of
the internal (private) one?
Because I was under the incorrect impression that all the other
directives were being written there. I've changed it - thanks for
catching it out.
Regards,
Graham
--
* Graham Leggett wrote:
André Malo wrote:
Is there a particular reason, that you changed the public context
instead of the internal (private) one?
Because I was under the incorrect impression that all the other
directives were being written there. I've changed it - thanks for
catching it
15 matches
Mail list logo
