+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
What if the backend address is not known in the configuration because computed
dynamically using for example RewriteMap ?
In that case I cannot see any other way of doing this than creating the worker
on the fly, and unfortunately with my current modifications I sooner or later
end up getting
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
Gesendet: Montag, 3. September 2007 08:15
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: RE: Apache 2.2.x: Implicit creation of new proxy_workers
What if the backend address is not known in the configuration
because computed
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
Gesendet: Montag, 3. September 2007 10:05
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: RE: Apache 2.2.x: Implicit creation of new proxy_workers
Persistent backend connection when proxying using RewriteRule
is exactly what I am
-Message d'origine-
De : Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : lundi 3 septembre 2007 10:35
À : dev@httpd.apache.org
Objet : Re: Apache 2.2.x: Implicit creation of new proxy_workers
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
Gesendet: Montag,
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 02:13:20PM +0200, Martin Kraemer wrote:
The Topics addressed in this patch are:
...
--- httpd-2.2.x/support/htpasswd.cWed Jul 12 05:38:44 2006
+++ /tmp/htpasswd.c Mon Sep 3 13:22:05 2007
@@ -101,6 +101,7 @@
The patch is against 2.2.x BTW.
Martin
--
[EMAIL
Do we want to pick up the new apr-util's which now include Roy's
commits to pick up db 4.6 and other fun test/ fixes? (including
running a bunch of tests which were previously 'interactively'
somewhat useless).
Just asking, I'll roll both apr's and apu's, or just apr's. Whichever
is fine by me
On Sep 3, 2007, at 4:05 AM, Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV wrote:
Persistent backend connection when proxying using RewriteRule is
exactly what I am trying to do.
AFAIU there is no way to achieve persistent connections with the
default worker because (correct me if I am wrong) a worker is
Hi!
I have error and can't install Flood. Error is:
/usr/share/apr-1.0/build/libtool --silent --mode=compile gcc-g -
O2 -pipe -Wall -g -O2 -pthread-DLINUX=2 -D_REENTRANT -
D_GNU_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -I/usr/include/apr-1.0 -I/usr/
include/apr-1.0 -I/usr/include/postgresql
List change:
On Sep 3, 2007, at 8:51 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Bill, are you planning to retag 0.9 with this fix? I know
I need to hold off on httpd 2.2 until the new 1.2 tag, but
if you are planning to also retag 0.9, I'd prefer to
wait until you do so for httpd
We'll pick up all the latest tags... :)
On Sep 3, 2007, at 8:55 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Do we want to pick up the new apr-util's which now include Roy's
commits to pick up db 4.6 and other fun test/ fixes? (including
running a bunch of tests which were previously 'interactively'
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 03:56:21PM +0300, Villem Alari wrote:
Hi!
I have error and can't install Flood. Error is:
/usr/share/apr-1.0/build/libtool --silent --mode=compile gcc-g -
O2 -pipe -Wall -g -O2 -pthread-DLINUX=2 -D_REENTRANT -
D_GNU_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE
On 09/02/2007 04:57 PM, Vinicius Petrucci wrote:
Hi Guys,
I've read Ruediger's patch about preventing mod_proxy_balancer from
overwriting the status of workers when creating a new child process
(http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=374929view=rev).
I'm running the latest stable release of
Hi !
I found this bug already opened at Bugzilla:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39907
In response to Ruediger's new patch, the call
PROXY_WORKER_IS_INITIALIZED(workers) is causing that error log:
[Mon Sep 03 18:32:34 2007] [notice] child pid 5225 exit signal
Segmentation
14 matches
Mail list logo
