Re: [PATCH 43415] Logging remote port.

2007-09-19 Thread Adam Hasselbalch Hansen
Plüm wrote: 1. Please provide a patch against trunk. mod_config_logger.c hasn't changed in trunk, so the patch will work fine. 2. Please also add a patch for the documentation. Done. 3. I am not too happy with using %R, but to be honest I have no better proposal :-). Maybe other

Re: [PATCH 43415] Logging remote port.

2007-09-19 Thread Adam Hasselbalch Hansen
Nick Kew wrote: Looks more like legislation for ISPs than folks with a webserver. ISPs and hosting companies alike. I'd be sceptical about that applying to non-sessions such as HTTP requests. I think that semantics are lost on these people. Part 4: [Requirements don't apply if

Re: [PATCH 43415] Logging remote port.

2007-09-19 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , VF-Group
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Adam Hasselbalch Hansen Gesendet: Mittwoch, 19. September 2007 11:13 An: dev@httpd.apache.org Betreff: Re: [PATCH 43415] Logging remote port. Plüm wrote: 1. Please provide a patch against trunk. mod_config_logger.c hasn't changed in trunk,

Re: new webaccel appliance

2007-09-19 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 09/18/2007 07:40 PM, Roy T.Fielding wrote: On Sep 18, 2007, at 6:46 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote: This works as designed. Please see the difference between the accept headers sent by IE6 and Firefox IE6: Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate Firefox: Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate

Re: new webaccel appliance

2007-09-19 Thread Henrik Nordstrom
On tis, 2007-09-18 at 22:41 +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote: Agreed. Depending on the answers above we may need to have a list of headers (like Accept-Encoding) where we compare the tokens in the field-value. For all other headers we would stay with the plain compare we do today. See also the

[STATUS] (httpd-2.0) Wed Sep 19 23:46:35 2007

2007-09-19 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2007-09-14 12:31:33 -0400 (Fri, 14 Sep 2007) $] The current version of this file can be found at: * http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS Documentation status is

[STATUS] (httpd-2.2) Wed Sep 19 23:47:25 2007

2007-09-19 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
APACHE 2.2 STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2007-09-19 12:41:35 -0400 (Wed, 19 Sep 2007) $] The current version of this file can be found at: * http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS Documentation status is

[STATUS] (httpd-trunk) Wed Sep 19 23:49:55 2007

2007-09-19 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
APACHE 2.3 STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2006-08-22 16:41:03 -0400 (Tue, 22 Aug 2006) $] The current version of this file can be found at: * http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/STATUS Documentation status is maintained

Re: Thoughts on Camillia in openssl binaries?

2007-09-19 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Tom Donovan wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: But if mod_deflate doesn't use it, and openssl is built zlib-dynamic, they simply pitched compression from ssl sessions as well with no other adverse effects. Yes, exactly. openssl doesn't select gzip compression if zlib-dynamic and zlib1.dll