Per my knowledge this is the apr source tar ball that was used. How do
I find the 'installed' apr and use that instead? Posted here because I
didn't get any response on the users list and this seemed to be a
modules issue.
Do let me know and Ill continue the posting there. thanks
Maybe you
Based on the few books that describe Apache module writing and a presentation
that I've found on the web from an Apache conference, the advice to module
writers is to remember that Apache calls the post-config phase twice - once
while it's checking its configuration files, and then when it's
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 23:40, Michael Durket
dur...@highwire.stanford.edu wrote:
Based on the few books that describe Apache module writing and a presentation
that I've found on the web from an Apache conference, the advice to module
writers is to remember that Apache calls the post-config
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009, Graham Leggett wrote:
Akins, Brian wrote:
FWIW, nginx buffers backend stuff to a file, then sendfiles it out - I
think this is what perlbal does as well. Same can be done outside apache
using X-sendfile like methods. Seems like we could move this inside
apache fairly
Hi folks,
I think I found a bug in either the Apache core or mod_proxy_fcgi otherwise.
First, let me describe my scenario:
I run Apache 2.2.14 on a Debian (2.6.28-2-amd64) box. As I have a urgent need
for mod_proxy_fcgi, I tried a backport by copying mod_proxy_fcgi.c and
fcgi_protocol.h to
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 07:06:16PM +0100, Kaspar Brand wrote:
Dr Stephen Henson wrote:
Yes that looks better. There is an alternative technique if it is easier to
find
a base SSL_CTX, you can retrieve the auto generated keys using
SSL_CTX_get_tlsext_ticket_keys() and then copy to the new
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009, Nick Kew wrote:
Graham Leggett wrote:
Is there a need to bundle APR at all?
Yep, let's draw a line under that. APR is a dependency,
not a component.
I assume that there still is a mechanism corresponding to
--with-included-apr? On a distro with bundled APR version X
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 8:28 PM, pqf p...@mailtech.cn wrote:
Hi,
Yes, mod_fcgid search process node base on file's inode and deviceid(plus
share_group_id, virtual host name). The goal is to create as less process as
possible. Some administrators like the idea that all virtual hosts share one
Joe Orton wrote:
On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 12:00:06AM +, Joe Orton wrote:
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 09:31:00PM +, Joe Orton wrote:
* we can detect in mod_ssl when the client is renegotiating by using the
callback installed using SSL_CTX_set_info_callback(), in conjunction
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 03:19:39PM +0100, Jean-Marc Desperrier wrote:
Joe Orton wrote:
On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 12:00:06AM +, Joe Orton wrote:
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 09:31:00PM +, Joe Orton wrote:
* we can detect in mod_ssl when the client is renegotiating by using
the
Hi,
So when Apache is compiled with openssl 0.9.8l, TLS renegotiation will
be fully disabled.
But the problem with that if that some comments of the discussion inside
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39243 are true, this
change will unexpectedly break very badly a *lot* of
On Monday 09 November 2009, Jeff Trawick wrote:
leading WS */ +last = value + strlen(value);
doesn't this expression set last to point to the trailing '\0'
instead of the last character
+while (last = value apr_isspace(*last)) {
such that this loop is
On Monday 09 November 2009, Greg Stein wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 14:46, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote:
On Monday 09 November 2009, Greg Stein wrote:
Why did you go with a format change of the DAVLockDB? It is
quite possible that people will miss that step during an
upgrade.
On 11/9/09 3:08 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
2) If you have 10,000 client connections, and some number of sockets
in the system ready for read/write... how do you quickly determine
*which* buckets to poll to get those sockets processed? You don't want
to poll idle
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009, scte...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sctemme
Date: Tue Nov 10 07:55:13 2009
New Revision: 834378
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=834378view=rev
Log:
enable support for ECC keys and ECDH ciphers. Tested against
OpenSSL 1.0.0b3. [Vipul Gupta vipul.gupta sun.com, Sander
Paul Querna wrote:
But Serf Buckets and the event loop definitely do need some more work
-- simple things, like if the backend bucket is a socket, how do you
tell the event loop, that a would block rvalue maps to a file
descriptor talking to an origin server. You don't want to just keep
Greg Stein wrote:
I am also concerned about the patterns of sendfile() in the current
serf bucket archittecture, and making a whole pipeline do sendfile
correctly seems quite difficult.
Well... it generally *is* quite difficult in the presence of SSL,
gzip, and chunking. Invariably,
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 18:47, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
...
When you read from a serf bucket, it will return however much you ask
for, or as much as it has without blocking. When it gives you that
data, it can say I have more, I'm done, or This is what I had
without blocking.
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:14, Akins, Brian brian.ak...@turner.com wrote:
On 11/9/09 3:08 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
2) If you have 10,000 client connections, and some number of sockets
in the system ready for read/write... how do you quickly determine
*which* buckets to poll to
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 12:01, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Nov 9, 2009, at 2:19 PM, Akins, Brian wrote:
On 11/9/09 2:06 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
These issues are already solved by moving to a Serf core. It is fully
asynchronous.
Okay that's one convert, any
Greg Stein wrote:
Who is you?
Anybody who reads from a bucket. In this case, the core network loop
when a client connection is ready for writing.
So would it be correct to say that in this theoretical httpd, the httpd
core, and nobody else, would read from the serf bucket?
Up till now, my
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 12:54, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
Greg Stein wrote:
Who is you?
Anybody who reads from a bucket. In this case, the core network loop
when a client connection is ready for writing.
So would it be correct to say that in this theoretical httpd, the httpd
I have been able to confirm this bug but have not designed a test
case. It should be fairly easy to duplicate, however. My particular
test case was using phpicalendar 2.31 with publish.php on Sunbird
calendars. Previously, this worked fine, but upon using fcgid 2.3.4,
I started getting calendar
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Dan Hulme dhu...@gmail.com wrote:
I have been able to confirm this bug but have not designed a test
case. It should be fairly easy to duplicate, however. My particular
test case was using phpicalendar 2.31 with publish.php on Sunbird
calendars. Previously,
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:14, Akins, Brian brian.ak...@turner.com wrote:
On 11/9/09 3:08 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
2) If you have 10,000 client connections, and some number of sockets
in the system ready for
Aha, thank you! This is the bug, indeed.
-Dan
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Dan Hulme dhu...@gmail.com wrote:
I have been able to confirm this bug but have not designed a test
case. It should be fairly easy to
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 3:40 AM, Niklas Edmundsson ni...@acc.umu.se wrote:
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009, Nick Kew wrote:
Graham Leggett wrote:
Is there a need to bundle APR at all?
Yep, let's draw a line under that. APR is a dependency,
not a component.
I assume that there still is a mechanism
On 11/10/09 1:56 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
But some buckets might be performing gzip or SSL encryption. That
consumes CPU within the network thread.
You could just run x times CPU cores number of network threads. You can't
use more than 100% of a CPU anyway.
The model that some
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 16:33, Lieven Govaerts svn...@mobsol.be wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
...
You have 10k buckets representing the response for 10k clients. The
core loop reads the response from the bucket, and writes that to the
network.
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 17:30, Akins, Brian brian.ak...@turner.com wrote:
On 11/10/09 1:56 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
But some buckets might be performing gzip or SSL encryption. That
consumes CPU within the network thread.
You could just run x times CPU cores number of network
Guenter Knauf wrote:
AC_DEFUN([CHECK_OCSP], [
AC_CHECK_HEADERS(openssl/ocsp.h,·
[AC_DEFINE([HAVE_OCSP], 1, [Define if OCSP is supported by OpenSSL])]
)
])
This seems like a very wordy way of expressing
AC_CHECK_HEADERS(openssl/ocsp.h)
Paul Querna wrote:
on request, here is mod_fcgid:
http://zeus.kimaker.com/~chip/fcgid-scan/
mod_ftp would also interest me, at least
dreamice wrote:
Trailing CRLF on POSTs
This is a legacy issue. The CERN webserver required POST data to have an
extra CRLF following it. Thus many clients send an extra CRLF that is not
included in the Content-Length of the request. Apache works around this
problem by eating any empty lines
Jeff Trawick wrote:
2009/11/9 pqf p...@mailtech.cn:
Hi, all
I am new to this community, I am think to add mod_status support to
mod_fcgid, which provide more internal information to administrators. Is it
a good idea? I am working on it now, but if someone think it's not a good
idea,
Graham Leggett wrote:
- Supporting prefork as httpd does now; and
I'm very happy to see prefork die it's timely death.
Let's go about working out where out-of-process magic happens.
Gated, single threaded handlers may be sensible in some cases.
But for the core server it makes async worthless,
Greg Stein wrote:
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 14:21, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
...
I agree in general, a serf-based core does give us a good start.
But Serf Buckets and the event loop definitely do need some more work
-- simple things, like if the backend bucket is a socket, how do you
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 05:30:34PM -0500, Akins, Brian wrote:
On 11/10/09 1:56 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
But some buckets might be performing gzip or SSL encryption. That
consumes CPU within the network thread.
You could just run x times CPU cores number of network
37 matches
Mail list logo
