Hi, all
I submitted my module to apache module registry on 5 days ago, but response is
nothing yet.
The site is woking now?
Submitted module name is mod_process_security.
regards,
- Original Message -
On 14.11.2011 15:46, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Isn't it similarly time to deploy SSLProtocol -SSLv2 by default?
Oh yes, definitely. I didn't realize that all is still the default
for
SSLProtocol... for trunk and 2.4, I would suggest to change the
defaults
Stolen from
http://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/roles.html#patch-manager
Patch Manager
$project usually has a Patch Manager, whose job is to watch the
dev@ mailing list and make sure that no patches slip through the
cracks.
This means watching every thread containing
- Original Message -
Hi,
we were told by pgollucci that there is already a Windows build bot
at the
ASF. It would be awesome if someone knowledgable in Windows could
work
with the Infra guys to set it up. The mail address is
bui...@apache.org
according to Philip.
+++1! If all
Original-Nachricht
Betreff:svn commit: r1202257 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/server/mpm/event:
config3.m4 equeue.c equeue.h event.c
Datum: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:51:04 GMT
Von:pque...@apache.org
Author: pquerna
Date: Tue Nov 15 15:51:03 2011
New Revision: 1202257
On 15.11.2011 17:06, Paul Querna wrote:
So, I was looking at all the system calls we make in a single request,
and comparing it to nginx.
We were actually pretty close, baring supporting our features like
htaccess, there was only one thing that stood out.
Glibc is opening, calling fstat twice,
On 16 Nov 2011, at 08:28, Igor Galić wrote:
Stolen from
Stolen from the reply I just posted to another dev list ;)
Patch Manager
Sounds like a role for an Igor.
(as any Pratchett fan will instantly understand :D )
Seriously, though, while it's a Good Thing to ensure patches
don't slip
On 15.11.2011 20:57, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 2:32 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 11/15/2011 12:33 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Tuesday 15 November 2011, Paul Querna wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Stefan Fritschs...@sfritsch.de
wrote:
On 11/16/2011 2:28 AM, Igor Galić wrote:
I really like the basic outline, but what I feel is missing, is the
notion of watching $issuetracker. Often we have patches getting lost
in there. So our patch manager should also look out for $PATCH issues
and make sure they are followed up, or
Mailed the error log to Stefan.
What I noticed, it is connecting to a port by a formerly used proxied
connection (port 7080 instead of 81);
Summary log:
[proxy:debug] [pid 8680:tid 2668] proxy_util.c(2140): proxy: HTTP: has
acquired connection for (*)
[proxy:debug] [pid 8680:tid 2668]
request_rec-connection-current_thread is a new feature, and
every request_rec-connection-current_thread should have different pool,
but now with a same pool,
This is need to fix.
Index: mpm/winnt/child.c
===
--- mpm/winnt/child.c
I've posted something on the ooo-dev@incubator list asking for
volunteers to help us with httpd-2.4 builds on Windows, btw.
On Nov 16, 2011, at 3:31 AM, Igor Galić wrote:
- Original Message -
Hi,
we were told by pgollucci that there is already a Windows build bot
at the
ASF.
Give chance to other module save thread-scope information, Please.
在 2011年11月16日 下午8:20，zhiguo zhao zha...@gmail.com写道：
request_rec-connection-current_thread is a new feature, and
every request_rec-connection-current_thread should have different pool,
but now with a same pool,
This is need
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 1:20 AM, Rüdiger Plüm
ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com wrote:
Original-Nachricht
Betreff: svn commit: r1202257 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/server/mpm/event:
config3.m4 equeue.c equeue.h event.c
Datum: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:51:04 GMT
Von: pque...@apache.org
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 2:44 AM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 15.11.2011 20:57, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 2:32 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 11/15/2011 12:33 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Tuesday 15 November 2011, Paul Querna
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 2:44 AM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 15.11.2011 20:57, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 2:32 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 11/15/2011 12:33 PM,
On Nov 16, 2011, at 11:20 AM, Paul Querna wrote:
What I am really opposed to is that the LoadModule causes such a
degradation in performance.
I am 100% +1 to adding conf commands to the default configuration in
the httpd.conf, but what I do not like is that having just a
LoadModule with
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 2:44 AM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 15.11.2011 20:57, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 2:32 PM,
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 2:44 AM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de
wrote:
On
On Wednesday 16 November 2011, Paul Querna wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 2:44 AM, Rainer Jung
rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 15.11.2011 20:57, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 2:32 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 11/15/2011 12:33 PM, Stefan
On Wednesday 16 November 2011, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
What I am really opposed to is that the LoadModule causes such a
degradation in performance.
In my quick (and maybe not that accurate) tests, the penalty caused
by mod_reqtimeout (1.4%) was smaller than the penalty of not
having
On 11/16/2011 4:39 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
I'd say it is OK. I assume a apachectl restart would do?
It should be expected for a long running daemon to signal it to adopt to
environmental
changes like the timezone.
Yup. Not that the times are wrong, they carry zone info within
the access
On 11/16/2011 10:20 AM, Paul Querna wrote:
I am 100% +1 to adding conf commands to the default configuration in
the httpd.conf, but what I do not like is that having just a
LoadModule with nothing else causes reqtimeout to do work. It is too
trivial for people to have accidental load modules
Were these results all based on 100% cpu pegged?
On 11/16/2011 2:03 PM, Pranesh Vadhirajan wrote:
I am trying to understand how to implement sharing of objects in memory between
various
processes in apache. I have been using the routines defined in sys/mman.h to
implement
the shared memory mapping functionality. However, I am not seeing any
All bugs categorized as 2.3-HEAD apply to 2.5-HEAD, so I have
simply renamed the tag.
There is no such entity 2.1-HEAD, as it became 2.2.0... but that
category is a mishmash of 2.0 specific bugs, 2.2 specific bugs,
and those that still apply to 2.5-HEAD.
Anyone who is willing to help out, I'd
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 21:03, Pranesh Vadhirajan
vadhira...@teralogics.com wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I am trying to understand how to implement sharing of objects in memory
between various processes in apache. I have been using the routines defined
in sys/mman.h to implement the shared
On Wednesday 16 November 2011, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Were these results all based on 100% cpu pegged?
Yes, the machine running httpd had both cores at 100%. The machine
running ab had a single core at ~ 70%.
On 8/3/2006 7:11 AM, jfcl...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jfclere
Date: Thu Aug 3 05:11:14 2006
New Revision: 428374
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=428374view=rev
Log:
A presistence to the shared memory slotmem.
Yes, that's from the wayback machine but applies as a roadblock
to shipping
On Wednesday 16 November 2011, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 11/16/2011 10:20 AM, Paul Querna wrote:
I am 100% +1 to adding conf commands to the default configuration
in the httpd.conf, but what I do not like is that having just a
LoadModule with nothing else causes reqtimeout to do work.
On 11/16/2011 5:06 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Wednesday 16 November 2011, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Will people be confused by a directive that does nothing when
placed in a named vhost? Or should this just be global-only and
forget about it? It would be nice to cripple this module, say,
31 matches
Mail list logo
