On Tuesday 03 January 2012, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 1/2/2012 4:10 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> > On Sunday 01 January 2012, Steffen wrote:
> >> Also IMHO blocking GA:
> >>
> >> - SSL on windows not usable
> >> - Hanging "logging" workers
> >> - Rewrite P
> >>
> >> On Sunday 01/01/2012 at 1
On Jan 2, 2012, at 8:09 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> I will crank out docs for these tomorrow and ping paul to review.
Thank you for getting this going: it seems to be the most constructive way to
resolve this issue.
S.
--
scte...@apache.orghttp://www.temme.net/sander/
PGP FP: FC
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Takashi Sato wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Jan 2012 23:06:35 +0100
> Stefan Fritsch wrote:
>
>> On Monday 02 January 2012, Takashi Sato wrote:
>> > mod_heartbeat
>> > mod_heartmonitor
>> > mod_lbmethod_heartbeat
>> >
>> > These have no documentation.
>> > Is that OK we releas
On Mon, 2 Jan 2012 23:06:35 +0100
Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> On Monday 02 January 2012, Takashi Sato wrote:
> > mod_heartbeat
> > mod_heartmonitor
> > mod_lbmethod_heartbeat
> >
> > These have no documentation.
> > Is that OK we release GA with no docs modules?
>
> I am +0.5 for removing them from
> The different handling of conn->port and conn->hostname doesn't look
> right to me. Can the r->proxyreq check actually be false at this point or is
> it simply redundant? And shouldn't the strcasecmp(conn->hostname,
> uri->hostname) check be done regardless of r->connection->keepalives?
I did no
On 1/1/2012 12:30 PM, Steffen wrote:
> Also IMHO blocking GA:
>
> - SSL on windows not usable
> - Hanging "logging" workers
Does disabling the EnableSendfile/EnableMMAP directives alter either
of these cases?
It really appears that socket reuse is to blame here. We know there
are plenty of wind
On 1/2/2012 4:10 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> On Sunday 01 January 2012, Steffen wrote:
>> Also IMHO blocking GA:
>>
>> - SSL on windows not usable
>> - Hanging "logging" workers
>> - Rewrite P
>
>> On Sunday 01/01/2012 at 19:03, Mario Brandt wrote:
>>> The loadbalancer still crashes on windows. S
On Sunday 01 January 2012, Steffen wrote:
> Also IMHO blocking GA:
>
> - SSL on windows not usable
> - Hanging "logging" workers
> - Rewrite P
> On Sunday 01/01/2012 at 19:03, Mario Brandt wrote:
> > The loadbalancer still crashes on windows. See
> > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.c
On Monday 02 January 2012, Takashi Sato wrote:
> mod_heartbeat
> mod_heartmonitor
> mod_lbmethod_heartbeat
>
> These have no documentation.
> Is that OK we release GA with no docs modules?
I am +0.5 for removing them from 2.4.0. They can be re-added when
someone writes the docs. Other opinions?
On Sun, 1 Jan 2012, Eric Covener wrote:
Can anyone more familiar with the code verify this? Steffen, maybe you
can try the change and see if it helps?
I think there are a few additional wrinkles -- I couldn't repro after
this but no confident about what's right with the addr handling:
http://
Stefan Fritsch wrote on Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 20:07:30 +0100:
> On Monday 02 January 2012, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Henri Yandell (Created) (JIRA) wrote on Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at
> 06:03:30 +:
> > > Note list name on mail detail page
> > > --
> > >
> > >
On Monday 02 January 2012, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Henri Yandell (Created) (JIRA) wrote on Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at
06:03:30 +:
> > Note list name on mail detail page
> > --
> >
> > Key: INFRA-4238
> > URL:
> > http
On 02 Jan 2012, at 7:18 PM, cove...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: covener
> Date: Mon Jan 2 17:18:39 2012
> New Revision: 1226477
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1226477&view=rev
> Log:
> add/enhance some hints about configuration section merging (or lack of it in
> the case of mod_acces
Henri Yandell (Created) (JIRA) wrote on Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 06:03:30 +:
> Note list name on mail detail page
> --
>
> Key: INFRA-4238
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4238
> Project: Infrastructur
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Steffen wrote:
>> This message denotes that there is a bug in the handler (maybe in
>> mod_negotiation). The log message itself is new, the bug probably isn't. Can
>> somebody find out what 620018 is on Windows?
>
> Any news on this bug ?
>
mod_negotiation issue wa
This message denotes that there is a bug in the handler (maybe in
mod_negotiation). The log message itself is new, the bug probably
isn't. Can somebody find out what 620018 is on Windows?
Any news on this bug ?
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Fritsch
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011
Maybe a clue:
Seems to happen when there is an error.
For example during Partial Downloading (206)
[http:error] [pid 3244:tid 2656] (70007)The timeout specified has expired:
[client 114.79.60.32:11091] Timeout while writing data for URI
/download/binaries/httpd-2.2.21-win32.zip to the client
-
17 matches
Mail list logo
