On Tuesday 03 January 2012, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 1/2/2012 4:10 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > > On Sunday 01 January 2012, Steffen wrote: > >> Also IMHO blocking GA: > >> > >> - SSL on windows not usable > >> - Hanging "logging" workers > >> - Rewrite P > >> > >> On Sunday 01/01/2012 at 19:03, Mario Brandt wrote: > >>> The loadbalancer still crashes on windows. See > >>> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52402 > > > > We should try to get at least the rewrite/proxy issue resolved, > > first. > > > > About the Windows-onlly issues... Well, if there are not > > sufficient developers who have time and inclination to look into > > those, I would rather release 2.4.0 as "GA on unix, beta on > > Windows", than delay it indefinitely. > > When we tag and roll 2.4.0, if it isn't up to snuff, it won't pass > the vote for GA, but perhaps it will pass the vote for beta (or > alpha). > > I'm not sure where the impetus came from to change the way the HTTP > Project operates at this particular point in time. It certainly > hasn't been discussed much on this list, or put up for a vote. > The methodology for handling releases was all hashed out a number > of years ago and was assembled from consensus. Has that consensus > changed?
No. The status of 2.4.0 will be determined by vote. I was just pointing out how I intend to vote in the face of the Windows issues and am lobbying for other people to consider this as a valid option, too.
