apreq does the right thing now by both throwing an
exception (indicating a malformed cookie) and parsing
the header correctly. This is a very old subject:
Thomas should be using eval like so:
$apreq = APR::Request::Apache2-handle($r);
my $jar = eval { $apreq-jar };
$jar = $@-jar if $@;
Hi,
I am (still) working on a module that uses another commercial shared object
library (.so). I use the following to successfully build the module
(currently, just tweaking mod_headers.c for testing):
/apps/httpd/bin/apxs -L /apps/netpoint/AccessServerSDK/oblix/lib/ -c -i -a
On 2012-06-21 19:47, oh...@cox.net wrote:
I've tried using -l pointing directly to the .so, libobaccess.so, but when I
do that, it says it can't find the .so:
[root@apachemodule build-mod_headers]# ./compile-mod-headers.sh
/apps/httpd/build/libtool --silent --mode=compile gcc -prefer-pic
Jim,
Have you looked at the LoadFile directive, sometime that can be of use for
third party libraries.
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/mod_so.html#loadfile
/Ant
On 21 June 2012 20:19, oh...@cox.net wrote:
Sorin Manolache sor...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-06-21 19:47, oh...@cox.net
oh...@cox.net wrote:
Sorin Manolache sor...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-06-21 19:47, oh...@cox.net wrote:
I've tried using -l pointing directly to the .so, libobaccess.so, but
when I do that, it says it can't find the .so:
[root@apachemodule build-mod_headers]#
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 8:43 PM, oh...@cox.net wrote:
I tried that, which allowed me to start Apache, but am getting a segfault.
Run it through gdb and inspect the backtrace. Compiling with debug
symbols and optimizations disabled (-g -O0) will help.
oh...@cox.net wrote:
Sorin Manolache sor...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-06-21 19:47, oh...@cox.net wrote:
I've tried using -l pointing directly to the .so, libobaccess.so, but
when I do that, it says it can't find the .so:
[root@apachemodule build-mod_headers]#
oh...@cox.net wrote:
oh...@cox.net wrote:
Sorin Manolache sor...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-06-21 19:47, oh...@cox.net wrote:
I've tried using -l pointing directly to the .so, libobaccess.so, but
when I do that, it says it can't find the .so:
On 2012-06-21 22:04, oh...@cox.net wrote:
Ben Noordhuis i...@bnoordhuis.nl wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 8:43 PM, oh...@cox.net wrote:
I tried that, which allowed me to start Apache, but am getting a segfault.
Run it through gdb and inspect the backtrace. Compiling with debug
symbols
Joe Lewis j...@joe-lewis.com wrote:
On 6/21/12 1:40 PM, oh...@cox.net wrote:
oh...@cox.net wrote:
Sorin Manolachesor...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-06-21 19:47, oh...@cox.net wrote:
I've tried using -l pointing directly to the .so, libobaccess.so, but
when I do that,
On 2012-06-21 22:22, oh...@cox.net wrote:
[root@apachemodule bin]# gdb httpd
GNU gdb Red Hat Linux (6.3.0.0-1.162.el4rh)
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it
Sorin Manolache sor...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-06-21 22:04, oh...@cox.net wrote:
Ben Noordhuis i...@bnoordhuis.nl wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 8:43 PM, oh...@cox.net wrote:
I tried that, which allowed me to start Apache, but am getting a segfault.
Run it through gdb
And I forgot to say: run gdb in some sort of environment where you see
your current source code line and a couple of surrounding lines. You
could achieve this with the list command, but I prefer running gdb in
emacs and let emacs do the nice listing of source code in a different panel.
S
Sorin Manolache sor...@gmail.com wrote:
And I forgot to say: run gdb in some sort of environment where you see
your current source code line and a couple of surrounding lines. You
could achieve this with the list command, but I prefer running gdb in
emacs and let emacs do the nice
Hello,
I am developing a module which extends mod_log_config and provides a
custom log format for CPU time elapsed per request. In order to do
this, once the request reaches the ap_run_log_transaction() hook, the
Apache worker must apr_proc_wait() for any child processes related to
the request to
On 6/21/12 5:49 PM, oh...@cox.net wrote:
oh...@cox.net wrote:
Sorin Manolachesor...@gmail.com wrote:
And I forgot to say: run gdb in some sort of environment where you see
your current source code line and a couple of surrounding lines. You
could achieve this with the list command,
Joe Lewis j...@joe-lewis.com wrote:
On 6/21/12 5:49 PM, oh...@cox.net wrote:
oh...@cox.net wrote:
Sorin Manolachesor...@gmail.com wrote:
And I forgot to say: run gdb in some sort of environment where you see
your current source code line and a couple of surrounding
oh...@cox.net wrote:
Joe Lewis j...@joe-lewis.com wrote:
On 6/21/12 5:49 PM, oh...@cox.net wrote:
oh...@cox.net wrote:
Sorin Manolachesor...@gmail.com wrote:
And I forgot to say: run gdb in some sort of environment where you see
your current source code
Joe Lewis j...@joe-lewis.com wrote:
On 6/21/12 6:46 PM, oh...@cox.net wrote:
Joe Lewisj...@joe-lewis.com wrote:
On 6/21/12 5:49 PM, oh...@cox.net wrote:
oh...@cox.net wrote:
Sorin Manolachesor...@gmail.com wrote:
And I forgot to say: run gdb in some sort of
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 3:32 AM, oh...@cox.net wrote:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x003518d6c1e1 in BN_num_bits () from /lib64/libcrypto.so.4
So, it's actually blowing up in BN_num_bits() in /lib64/libcrypto.so.4?
Type `bt full` and you'll get a backtrace +
On 6/21/12 7:32 PM, oh...@cox.net wrote:
oh...@cox.net wrote:
Joe Lewisj...@joe-lewis.com wrote:
On 6/21/12 6:46 PM, oh...@cox.net wrote:
Joe Lewisj...@joe-lewis.com wrote:
On 6/21/12 5:49 PM, oh...@cox.net wrote:
oh...@cox.net wrote:
Sorin
Joe Lewis j...@joe-lewis.com wrote:
On 6/21/12 7:32 PM, oh...@cox.net wrote:
oh...@cox.net wrote:
Joe Lewisj...@joe-lewis.com wrote:
On 6/21/12 6:46 PM, oh...@cox.net wrote:
Joe Lewisj...@joe-lewis.com wrote:
On 6/21/12 5:49 PM, oh...@cox.net wrote:
oh...@cox.net wrote:
oh...@cox.net wrote:
Joe Lewis j...@joe-lewis.com wrote:
On 6/21/12 7:32 PM, oh...@cox.net wrote:
oh...@cox.net wrote:
Joe Lewisj...@joe-lewis.com wrote:
On 6/21/12 6:46 PM, oh...@cox.net wrote:
Joe
On 6/21/12 9:39 PM, oh...@cox.net wrote:
oh...@cox.net wrote:
oh...@cox.net wrote:
Joe Lewisj...@joe-lewis.com wrote:
On 6/21/12 7:32 PM, oh...@cox.net wrote:
oh...@cox.net wrote:
Joe Lewisj...@joe-lewis.com wrote:
On 6/21/12 6:46 PM, oh...@cox.net wrote:
Joe Lewis j...@joe-lewis.com wrote:
On 6/21/12 9:39 PM, oh...@cox.net wrote:
oh...@cox.net wrote:
oh...@cox.net wrote:
Joe Lewisj...@joe-lewis.com wrote:
On 6/21/12 7:32 PM, oh...@cox.net wrote:
oh...@cox.net wrote:
Joe Lewisj...@joe-lewis.com wrote:
On 6/21/12 10:02 PM, oh...@cox.net wrote:
Joe Lewisj...@joe-lewis.com wrote:
On 6/21/12 9:39 PM, oh...@cox.net wrote:
oh...@cox.net wrote:
oh...@cox.net wrote:
Joe Lewisj...@joe-lewis.com wrote:
On 6/21/12 7:32 PM, oh...@cox.net wrote:
oh...@cox.net wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Nick Edwards nick.z.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I posted this to users list last week but no-one bit, so I'm trying here.
With md5crypt no longer recommended for use by its author, will Apache
soon support sha256/sha512 in basic authentication via MySQL.
On 21/06/2012 12:40, Ben Laurie wrote:
4. Use something that is hard to optimise in hardware (ideally).
And what about massive sites that need the crypto HW to manage the
concurrent logins?
Yes, you're making it harder on the hackers, but also potentially on our
users.
...Or did I just put my
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Issac Goldstand mar...@beamartyr.net wrote:
On 21/06/2012 12:40, Ben Laurie wrote:
4. Use something that is hard to optimise in hardware (ideally).
And what about massive sites that need the crypto HW to manage the
concurrent logins?
I have never come across
On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 10:40 +0100, Ben Laurie wrote:
4. Use something that is hard to optimise in hardware (ideally).
5. Only hire web developers who know what they're doing, who know what
security is, and how to audit their code :)
If they cant get the database, then it wouldn't mater if
On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 10:57 +0100, Ben Laurie wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Issac Goldstand mar...@beamartyr.net
wrote:
On 21/06/2012 12:40, Ben Laurie wrote:
4. Use something that is hard to optimise in hardware (ideally).
And what about massive sites that need the crypto HW
* Reindl Harald wrote:
i only needed to point out that weakhash(weakhash(weakhash()))
does not result in stronghash() no matter how often you wrap
I'm not sure, why the topic drifted there anyway. md5crypt does not actually
nest hashes like this.
nd
--
package
Sorin Manolache sor...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-06-21 19:47, oh...@cox.net wrote:
I've tried using -l pointing directly to the .so, libobaccess.so, but
when I do that, it says it can't find the .so:
[root@apachemodule build-mod_headers]# ./compile-mod-headers.sh
On 20/06/2012 14:19, Thomas Busch wrote:
On 20/06/2012 13:35, Thomas Busch wrote:
The reason I'm asking is that the following bug
https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=69866
hasn't been solved and is still causing Internal Server Error's on
a lot of mod_perl installation.
I see
Hi Stefan,
On 6/21/12, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012, Nick Edwards wrote:
I posted this to users list last week but no-one bit, so I'm trying here.
With md5crypt no longer recommended for use by its author, will Apache
soon support sha256/sha512 in basic
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 15:42 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote:
Docs contain this note for LimitRequestFieldSize directive:
noteUnder normal conditions, the value should not be changed from
the default. Also, you can't set this higher than 8190 without
modifying the source code and
36 matches
Mail list logo
