Re: [VOTE] Adopt the comments.a.o system to the 2.2 and 2.4 branch of the httpd docs

2012-07-09 Thread Ruediger Pluem
Daniel Gruno wrote: After many an attempt, we now have LDAP authentication for comments.apache.org set up, and the comment system is ready to roll. Any committer that wishes to moderate comments can now do so using their Apache credentials. With that in order, and with the comment system

Re: [VOTE] Adopt the comments.a.o system to the 2.2 and 2.4 branch of the httpd docs

2012-07-09 Thread Issac Goldstand
On 09/07/2012 01:12, Mads Toftum wrote: On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 10:33:56PM +0200, Daniel Gruno wrote: [ ] +1: Adopt the comments.a.o system in the 2.2 and 2.4 branch of docs [ ] 0: I don't care [X] -1: Don't adopt the system, because Only trunk is CTR. Can you explain the rationale of

Re: [VOTE] Adopt the comments.a.o system to the 2.2 and 2.4 branch of the httpd docs

2012-07-09 Thread Graham Leggett
On 09 Jul 2012, at 12:12 AM, Mads Toftum wrote: On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 10:33:56PM +0200, Daniel Gruno wrote: [ ] +1: Adopt the comments.a.o system in the 2.2 and 2.4 branch of docs [ ] 0: I don't care [X] -1: Don't adopt the system, because Only trunk is CTR. The way I understand it

Re: [VOTE] Adopt the comments.a.o system to the 2.2 and 2.4 branch of the httpd docs

2012-07-09 Thread Daniel Gruno
On 07/09/2012 09:24 AM, Issac Goldstand wrote: On 09/07/2012 01:12, Mads Toftum wrote: On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 10:33:56PM +0200, Daniel Gruno wrote: [ ] +1: Adopt the comments.a.o system in the 2.2 and 2.4 branch of docs [ ] 0: I don't care [X] -1: Don't adopt the system, because Only

[BUG] PROPPATCH delete (svn propdel) errors not returned

2012-07-09 Thread Arwin
Hi All, I've filed Bug 53525 https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53525 in the ASF Bugzilla. Description On failure to execute a PROPPATCH to remove a property, the error is not returned to the caller. A comment in the code says: code snippet 1044: /* 1045: ** Delete the

Re: [VOTE] Adopt the comments.a.o system to the 2.2 and 2.4 branch of the httpd docs

2012-07-09 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 7/9/2012 3:20 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote: I can, to some extent, understand Mads' reasons for voting -1, but I'd also like some elaboration, so I don't get the wrong impression. Personally, my rationale for adopting it to 2.2 and 2.4 is that _people will use it_ there, which is what we want. I

Re: [VOTE] Adopt the comments.a.o system to the 2.2 and 2.4 branch of the httpd docs

2012-07-09 Thread Rainer Jung
On 08.07.2012 22:33, Daniel Gruno wrote: [X] +1: Adopt the comments.a.o system in the 2.2 and 2.4 branch of docs [ ] 0: I don't care [ ] -1: Don't adopt the system, because Thanks for your work on this! Rainer