rotatelogs input from named pipe

Hi -- I recently needed to wire up httpd's rotatelogs to a named pipe (a FIFO) instead of to stdin. For context, we have a non-httpd server process configured to write to the pipe instead of a log file; further, this server likes to intermittently open, write to, and close its various log file

Re: Win32 src bundles for Apache

On 12/18/2012 1:32 PM, Andy Wang wrote: On 12/18/2012 02:45 PM, Gregg Smith wrote: The difference between the win32 and unix sources are the line endings (Win's vs. Unix's) and the .mak & .dep files. These make & dependency files have been exported from Visual C++ 6, which was the last vers

Re: Win32 src bundles for Apache

On 12/18/2012 02:45 PM, Gregg Smith wrote: The difference between the win32 and unix sources are the line endings (Win's vs. Unix's) and the .mak & .dep files. These make & dependency files have been exported from Visual C++ 6, which was the last version that would export them. Apologies for

Re: Win32 src bundles for Apache

On 12/18/2012 02:45 PM, Gregg Smith wrote: On 12/18/2012 9:00 AM, Yehuda Katz wrote: On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Andy Wang > wrote: This was brought up a while ago that the Apache 2.4.x and 2.2.23 builds were lacking the win32 source bundle. There was some

Re: Win32 src bundles for Apache

On 12/18/2012 9:00 AM, Yehuda Katz wrote: On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Andy Wang > wrote: This was brought up a while ago that the Apache 2.4.x and 2.2.23 builds were lacking the win32 source bundle. There was some discussion about how to build these bundl

Push for 2.4.4… slowed down just a touch

We've come a long way, but I think doing a release "now" is likely a disservice to the community. Instead, I plan on focusing on a T&R soon after the start of the year. The advantage of this is that it allows some time for some additional backports (and review of the Balancer inherit and persist s

Re: Win32 src bundles for Apache

On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Andy Wang wrote: > This was brought up a while ago that the Apache 2.4.x and 2.2.23 builds > were lacking the win32 source bundle. There was some discussion about how > to build these bundles: > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/201209.mbox/%

Win32 src bundles for Apache

This was brought up a while ago that the Apache 2.4.x and 2.2.23 builds were lacking the win32 source bundle. There was some discussion about how to build these bundles: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/201209.mbox/%3C506243E0.3050108%40apache.org%3E Is there anyway to make a

Re: svn commit: r1423353 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: docs/log-message-tags/next-number modules/proxy/mod_proxy_ftp.c

On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Joe Orton wrote: > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 08:29:21AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote: > > My understanding is that we don't maintain messages numbers for TRACE > > messages, so the APLOGNO() could have been simply deleted. > > > > (I see several mod_lua messages that

Re: svn commit: r1423353 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: docs/log-message-tags/next-number modules/proxy/mod_proxy_ftp.c

On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 08:29:21AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote: > My understanding is that we don't maintain messages numbers for TRACE > messages, so the APLOGNO() could have been simply deleted. > > (I see several mod_lua messages that don't follow this pattern.) Ah, sorry, I didn't realise that.

Re: svn commit: r1423353 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: docs/log-message-tags/next-number modules/proxy/mod_proxy_ftp.c

On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 4:01 AM, wrote: > Author: jorton > Date: Tue Dec 18 09:01:02 2012 > New Revision: 1423353 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1423353&view=rev > Log: > * modules/proxy/mod_proxy_ftp.c: Fill in APLOGNO. > > Modified: > httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/log-message-tags/next-