Re: svn commit: r1466669 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

2013-04-12 Thread Daniel Gruno
On 04/12/2013 10:42 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote: > On 10.04.2013 23:21, Guenter Knauf wrote: >> On 10.04.2013 23:01, fua...@apache.org wrote: >>> Author: fuankg >>> Date: Wed Apr 10 21:01:51 2013 >>> New Revision: 149 >>> >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r149 >>> Log: >>> Put this backport for no

Re: svn commit: r1467433 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS

2013-04-12 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 4/12/2013 2:32 PM, wr...@apache.org wrote: > Author: wrowe > Date: Fri Apr 12 19:32:55 2013 > New Revision: 1467433 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1467433 > Log: > Belated explantion for druggeri > > Modified: > httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS > > Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STA

Re: 2.4.4 graceful restart taking long time [PATCH]

2013-04-12 Thread Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
On Friday 12 of April 2013, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote: > 6) possible solution - detect that sending dummy_connection data weren't > processed by children by trying to read reply > > diff -ur httpd-2.4.4.org/server/mpm_unix.c httpd-2.4.4/server/mpm_unix.c > --- httpd-2.4.4.org/server/mpm_unix.c 2

Re: svn commit: r1466669 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

2013-04-12 Thread Guenter Knauf
On 10.04.2013 23:21, Guenter Knauf wrote: On 10.04.2013 23:01, fua...@apache.org wrote: Author: fuankg Date: Wed Apr 10 21:01:51 2013 New Revision: 149 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r149 Log: Put this backport for now on hold to get some more time for testing ... ok, onward with some mo

Re: svn commit: r1466669 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

2013-04-12 Thread Gregg Smith
On 4/12/2013 10:43 AM, Guenter Knauf wrote: I know; but I dont know if Gregg did a release or debug build; I've heard a couple of times in the past that folks were not able to re-create crash with debug builds but which happen with release builds; that could f.e. explain why Daniel doesnt see th

Re: svn commit: r1466669 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

2013-04-12 Thread Guenter Knauf
On 11.04.2013 12:25, Guenter Knauf wrote: well, another possible fix would be this one: Index: modules/lua/lua_request.c === --- modules/lua/lua_request.c(revision 1466743) +++ modules/lua/lua_request.c(working copy) @@ -120

Re: svn commit: r1466669 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

2013-04-12 Thread Gregg Smith
On 4/12/2013 10:43 AM, Guenter Knauf wrote: Hi Bill, On 12.04.2013 18:37, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 01:55:57 +0200 Guenter Knauf wrote: I've now tested on Windows, and I can see all previously mentioned issues there too; in addition the attached script which works fine on

Re: svn commit: r1466669 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

2013-04-12 Thread Guenter Knauf
On 11.04.2013 15:06, Daniel Gruno wrote: On 04/11/2013 02:36 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote: oh, and some more questions: whats the benefit of having banner(), port() and started() as functions (or methods)? isnt it fine accessing these like f.e. r.filename? r:put(r.banner) would be even shorter than r

Re: svn commit: r1466669 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

2013-04-12 Thread Guenter Knauf
Hi Bill, On 12.04.2013 18:37, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 01:55:57 +0200 Guenter Knauf wrote: I've now tested on Windows, and I can see all previously mentioned issues there too; in addition the attached script which works fine on NetWare crashes the Windows httpd ... Back

Re: svn commit: r1466669 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS

2013-04-12 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 01:55:57 +0200 Guenter Knauf wrote: > I've now tested on Windows, and I can see all previously mentioned > issues there too; in addition the attached script which works fine on > NetWare crashes the Windows httpd ... Backtrace, please? A strange idea, but did you happen to

Re: 2.4.4 graceful restart taking long time [PATCH]

2013-04-12 Thread Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
On Friday 12 of April 2013, Eric Covener wrote: > > diff -ur httpd-2.4.4.org/server/mpm_unix.c httpd-2.4.4/server/mpm_unix.c > > --- httpd-2.4.4.org/server/mpm_unix.c 2012-07-03 21:38:58.0 > > +0200 +++ httpd-2.4.4/server/mpm_unix.c 2013-04-12 > > 09:14:58.282929959 +0200 @@ -604,7

Re: 2.4.4 graceful restart taking long time [PATCH]

2013-04-12 Thread Eric Covener
> diff -ur httpd-2.4.4.org/server/mpm_unix.c httpd-2.4.4/server/mpm_unix.c > --- httpd-2.4.4.org/server/mpm_unix.c 2012-07-03 21:38:58.0 +0200 > +++ httpd-2.4.4/server/mpm_unix.c 2013-04-12 09:14:58.282929959 +0200 > @@ -604,7 +604,17 @@ > len = strlen(data); > } > > -

Re: use connection hostname for SNI and SSLProxyCheckPeerCN instead of the Host: header

2013-04-12 Thread Ruediger Pluem
Tom Evans wrote: > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Lam, Eugene wrote: >> Hi Kaspar, >> >> Thanks for digging up that thread. I still think SNI needs to be >> considered, but not in the way I originally thought! >> >> On 4/10/13 9:43 PM, "Kaspar Brand" wrote: >> >> On 10.04.2013 02:49, Lam, Eu

Re: use connection hostname for SNI and SSLProxyCheckPeerCN instead of the Host: header

2013-04-12 Thread Tom Evans
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Lam, Eugene wrote: > Hi Kaspar, > > Thanks for digging up that thread. I still think SNI needs to be > considered, but not in the way I originally thought! > > On 4/10/13 9:43 PM, "Kaspar Brand" wrote: > > On 10.04.2013 02:49, Lam, Eugene wrote: > > ssl_engine_io

Re: 2.4.4 graceful restart taking long time [PATCH]

2013-04-12 Thread Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
On Thursday 11 of April 2013, Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz wrote: > Hello, > > On apache 2.2.22, 2.2.23 and 2.4.4 I'm able to reproduce a problem > where graceful restart takes very long time. Linux 3.7.10, glibc 2.17 here. Summary of my findings 1) main process on gracefull restart calls /* kill off t