Re: svn commit: r1715401 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: include/ap_mmn.h include/httpd.h server/util.c

I thought about that, but we don't have many do-whiles :) But whatever people would prefer is fine w/ me... > On Nov 20, 2015, at 5:29 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > > Alternatively, a single/simpler while (n--){} would work too. > > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:17 PM, Yann

Re: svn commit: r1715401 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: include/ap_mmn.h include/httpd.h server/util.c

On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > I thought about that, but we don't have many do-whiles :) Fair enough :) > > But whatever people would prefer is fine w/ me... You convinced me.

Bug report for Apache httpd-2 [2015/11/22]

+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Re: svn commit: r1715554 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/server/util.c

On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 5:47 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > I suggest this is wrong, and that the appropriate table should be built. > > EBCDIC platforms do have i18n (typicially single-byte) lower/upper > equivalences, and the underlying implementation should not be trusted

Re: svn commit: r1715554 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/server/util.c

I suggest this is wrong, and that the appropriate table should be built. EBCDIC platforms do have i18n (typicially single-byte) lower/upper equivalences, and the underlying implementation should not be trusted for straight ASCII token case insensitive comparisons. On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 1:35

Re: 2.4.18?

I don't care who the author is - if people keep up with toxic language like what has been used in this thread, they will be removed from the lists without any further warning. Consider this your first, last and only warning. I trust I don't have to go into details about who said what here. With

Re: 2.4.18?

On 19/11/2015 01:43, Jim Jagielski wrote: If you don't need the stuff in 2.4.18 and 2.4.17 is fine for you then there is no need to upgrade... I certainly wont be, nor will many others from what I've heard, anyway close to holidays now so wont be doing much anyway. -- If you have the urge

Re: 2.4.18?

On 18/11/2015 19:48, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 18.11.2015 um 08:16 schrieb Noel Butler: On 17/11/2015 22:33, Reindl Harald wrote: 5 or 6 bloody weeks is a month - so what's the problem? any other software but httpd is allowed to have monthly updates? "I can accept" - seriously - you can just