Re: Issues with --enable_mod[ules|s-shared|s-static] 'few', 'none' and proxy

On 06/23/2016 08:03 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > > On 06/23/2016 05:49 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 10:24 AM, William A Rowe Jr > > wrote: >> >> So digging deeper, this just seemed odd until I found... >> >> >>

Re: Issues with --enable_mod[ules|s-shared|s-static] 'few', 'none' and proxy

On 06/23/2016 05:49 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 10:24 AM, William A Rowe Jr > wrote: > > So digging deeper, this just seemed odd until I found... > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 10:05 AM, William A Rowe Jr

Re: T 2.4.23 tomorrow (Thurs) ??

Things are still too loosey-goosey... I am going to wait until the start of next week to (likely) T and give some time for the churn to stabilize.

Re: Issues with --enable_mod[ules|s-shared|s-static] 'few', 'none' and proxy

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 10:24 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > So digging deeper, this just seemed odd until I found... > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 10:05 AM, William A Rowe Jr > wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 6:13 AM, Jens Schleusener < >>

Re: T 2.4.23 tomorrow (Thurs) ??

On Thu, 23 Jun 2016, William A Rowe Jr wrote: On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 6:13 AM, Jens Schleusener wrote: Just for curiosity I copied the soure code via  svn checkout http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x  src/httpd-2.4.x> ./buildconf  

Issues with --enable_mod[ules|s-shared|s-static] 'few', 'none' and proxy

So digging deeper, this just seemed odd until I found... On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 10:05 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 6:13 AM, Jens Schleusener < > jens.schleuse...@t-online.de> wrote: > >> Just for curiosity I copied the soure code via >> >> svn

Re: T 2.4.23 tomorrow (Thurs) ??

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 6:13 AM, Jens Schleusener < jens.schleuse...@t-online.de> wrote: > Just for curiosity I copied the soure code via > > svn checkout http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x > > src/httpd-2.4.x> ./buildconf > > src/httpd-2.4.x> ./configure

Re: T 2.4.23 tomorrow (Thurs) ??

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 7:32 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > The patch appears to be as simple as; > ... > Close, not quite. The defect is actually in... if test "$enable_proxy" = "shared"; then proxy_mods_enable=shared elif test "$enable_proxy" = "yes"; then

Re: MinSpareThreads lower bound calculation and docs

I am lurking with interest, but am no expert to answer your question. > Am 23.06.2016 um 14:55 schrieb Luca Toscano : > > > > 2016-06-18 11:53 GMT+02:00 Luca Toscano : > Hi Apache devs! > > I have a question for you about the following users@

Re: MinSpareThreads lower bound calculation and docs

2016-06-18 11:53 GMT+02:00 Luca Toscano : > Hi Apache devs! > > I have a question for you about the following users@ email thread: > > - > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ba26440a53773426e29296569bec17692c77a4a3bd07e8b5331474c4@1464703063@%3Cusers.httpd.apache.org%3E

Re: T 2.4.23 tomorrow (Thurs) ??

The patch appears to be as simple as; Index: modules/proxy/config.m4 === --- modules/proxy/config.m4 (revision 1749791) +++ modules/proxy/config.m4 (working copy) @@ -59,14 +59,13 @@ APACHE_MODULE(proxy_balancer, Apache proxy

Re: T 2.4.23 tomorrow (Thurs) ??

There is still a reproducible edge case here, thanks for the report (focused on the later half of your email). Nothing unusual about your ./buildconf environment. Also --enable-modules=few exhibits the same behavior. Will have an update in the next 30 minutes. On Jun 23, 2016 7:10 AM, "William

Re: T 2.4.23 tomorrow (Thurs) ??

Ugg... Thanks for the test and the feedback. Will hold off and look into it. > On Jun 23, 2016, at 7:13 AM, Jens Schleusener > wrote: > > On Wed, 22 Jun 2016, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> Subj sez it all... afaict, there are no showstoppers and >> no outstanding

Re: T 2.4.23 tomorrow (Thurs) ??

On Jun 23, 2016 6:13 AM, "Jens Schleusener" wrote: > > On Wed, 22 Jun 2016, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> Subj sez it all... afaict, there are no showstoppers and >> no outstanding issues (none seen in STATUS, or noted as >> such on any Email threads). >> >> So...

Re: T 2.4.23 tomorrow (Thurs) ??

On Wed, 22 Jun 2016, Jim Jagielski wrote: Subj sez it all... afaict, there are no showstoppers and no outstanding issues (none seen in STATUS, or noted as such on any Email threads). So... anyone opposed to a T tomorrow in the hopes of getting this out to people by the start of next week??

Re: T 2.4.23 tomorrow (Thurs) ??

Well, perl seems to be at the expected place but perlsub.pod seems to be nowhere. Must be an issue on my test environment or a file not included in my distro or a change between perl 5.18 and 5.22 Thx for your time and explanation. CJ Le 23/06/2016 à 10:55, Stefan Eissing a écrit : As

Re: T 2.4.23 tomorrow (Thurs) ??

Did not have mod_cgi loaded. Now: t/filter/case.t .. [Thu Jun 23 10:50:33.548696 2016] [so:warn] [pid 57617:tid 140735287451648] AH01574: module cgid_module is already loaded, skipping 1..4 # Running under perl version 5.018002 for darwin # Current time local: Thu Jun 23 10:50:33 2016 # Current

Re: T 2.4.23 tomorrow (Thurs) ??

Current 2.4.x, Ubuntu 16.04: The output with -verbose is: t/filter/case.t .. 1..4 # Running under perl version 5.022001 for linux # Current time local: Thu Jun 23 10:39:03 2016 # Current time GMT: Thu Jun 23 08:39:03 2016 # Using Test.pm version 1.26 # Using Apache/Test.pm version 1.40 ok 1 #

Re: T 2.4.23 tomorrow (Thurs) ??

Current 2.4.x, OS X: t/filter/case.t .. ok All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=3, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.00 sys + 0.36 cusr 0.18 csys = 0.55 CPU) Result: PASS > Am 23.06.2016 um 10:08 schrieb Marion & Christophe JAILLET > : > > > > Le

Re: T 2.4.23 tomorrow (Thurs) ??

Le 22/06/2016 à 22:05, Jim Jagielski a écrit : Subj sez it all... afaict, there are no showstoppers and no outstanding issues (none seen in STATUS, or noted as such on any Email threads). So... anyone opposed to a T tomorrow in the hopes of getting this out to people by the start of next