An update concerning the sporadic proxy test failures for prefork on
Solaris that I observed:
These are a bit difficult to nail down, because running only the proxy
tests does not fail. One has to run a relatively big part of the test
suite to have a chance of triggering the problem during
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Steffen wrote:
> On Windows it does not build out of the box.
>
> Missing modules/core include for mod_watchdog.h in
> mod_proxy_balancer.dsp/mak and libhttp.dsp/mak . Did not checked cmake.
Seems baffling, but it is pretty straightforward
On 2017-09-28 09:51, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Personally, I don't think the age or heritage of the build-logic is the issue,
> but rather a lack of people *really* testing 2.4.x until a release is tagged.
> It's for that reason that I tend to pre-announce a T well in advance of
> actually
> DOING
If the issue is "real" and a patch is forthcoming, I agree that we
mark 2.4.28 as DOA and proceed w/ 2.4.29 next week. I am comfortable keeping
the VOTE open longer that the normal/required 72hours to be sure one way
or another.
Personally, I don't think the age or heritage of the build-logic is
Am 25.09.2017 um 14:13 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd
version 2.4.28 can be found at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.28 GA.
[X] +1: Good to go
[ ] +0: meh
[ ] -1: Danger
Update: disregard the man behind the curtain - for now.
I have the strangest effects on my main machine under native macOS 10.12.6,
which
do not happen on my parallels ubuntu image and my laptop with macOS 10.13.0. I
tested
with hyperthreading disabled to exclude the Intel *lake bugs, but it
Analyzing...
my checkout of branch/2.4.x does not show this.
my buildt of 2.4.28 with -deps as provided, does after while of letting:
while true; do h2load -t 8 -c 100 -n 1 -m 5 -d gen/data-10k
http://test.example.org:12345/; done
run (data-10k is a 10k text file). The whole server setup
+1 to doing a 2.4.29 next week with these issues fixed.
On 9/27/2017 9:21 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
The assert() has me concerned, and Steffen's report is problematic. He has
a vote but hasn't cast it. At this moment I'm -0 and would spin a 2.4.29
next week to address these issues, unless