On 05/23/2018 10:32 AM, Marion et Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> '--with-test-suite=...' is for the Perl test framework, not for the
> 'test/httpdunit'.
Ah, yes! Thanks for the reminder; --with-test-suite only enables the
`make check` functionality. Sorry, it's been too long.
On 05/23/2018 01:21
Le 23/05/2018 à 20:52, Micha Lenk a écrit :
Am 23.05.2018 um 20:18 schrieb Marion et Christophe JAILLET:
Could you please try to 'make clean' and 'make' to see if you still have
the build issue?
No change. :(
Regards,
Micha
I can reproduce the issue if I don't pass any --enable-mpms-shared
Am 23.05.2018 um 20:18 schrieb Marion et Christophe JAILLET:
> Could you please try to 'make clean' and 'make' to see if you still have
> the build issue?
No change. :(
Regards,
Micha
Le 23/05/2018 à 14:48, Micha Lenk a écrit :
On 05/25/2017 11:44 PM, Jacob Champion wrote (almost a year ago):
Last week I had a personal hackathon since I couldn't make it out to
ApacheCon. As a result there is now a C-language unit test suite
available in branches/httpdunit (based on trunk).
Le 23/05/2018 à 16:14, Micha Lenk a écrit :
Hi Eric,
On 05/23/2018 02:59 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
I guess the CI setup needs to be updated to at least build the unit
tests?
I did not configure the build explicitly to run the unit tests, so it
is just the plain "make" that causes this target
Le 23/05/2018 à 16:21, Joe Orton a écrit :
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 04:14:39PM +0200, Micha Lenk wrote:
Hi Eric,
On 05/23/2018 02:59 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
I guess the CI setup needs to be updated to at least build the unit tests?
I did not configure the build explicitly to run the unit tes
On Wed, May 23, 2018, 7:35 AM Micha Lenk wrote:
> > It should only get built if you configure --with-test-suite=... and
> > specify the path to a perl-framework wc. It builds for me in trunk.
>
> Hmm, no difference. It seems to get built independent from whether you
> specify --with-test-suite o
Hi Joe,
On 05/23/2018 04:21 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 04:14:39PM +0200, Micha Lenk wrote:
Hi Eric,
On 05/23/2018 02:59 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
I guess the CI setup needs to be updated to at least build the unit tests?
I did not configure the build explicitly to run the un
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 04:14:39PM +0200, Micha Lenk wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On 05/23/2018 02:59 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> > I guess the CI setup needs to be updated to at least build the unit tests?
>
> I did not configure the build explicitly to run the unit tests, so it is
> just the plain "make
Hi Eric,
On 05/23/2018 02:59 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
I guess the CI setup needs to be updated to at least build the unit tests?
I did not configure the build explicitly to run the unit tests, so it is
just the plain "make" that causes this target to get build. I would
expect the CI setup to
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 8:48 AM, Micha Lenk wrote:
> On 05/25/2017 11:44 PM, Jacob Champion wrote (almost a year ago):
>>
>> Last week I had a personal hackathon since I couldn't make it out to
>> ApacheCon. As a result there is now a C-language unit test suite available
>> in branches/httpdunit (
On 25 May 2017, at 11:44 PM, Jacob Champion wrote:
> Last week I had a personal hackathon since I couldn't make it out to
> ApacheCon. As a result there is now a C-language unit test suite available in
> branches/httpdunit (based on trunk). I've tested it with a Windows+CMake
> toolchain as we
> On May 20, 2018, at 4:59 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
>
> Now we are back to 2.4.29 code, r1822341 is in again, and I committed
> additional changes (minimal hopefully) to address the issues reported
> in PR 62308 (and PR 62044 still). My own testing, based on the tests
> run by the OP (his on W
13 matches
Mail list logo