Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/proxy proxy_connect.c

thank you, I can now build again. :-) Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Saturday, November 22, 2003 6:06:29 PM trawick 2003/11/22 17:06:29 Modified:modules/proxy

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS

is ON. Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Friday, November 21, 2003 4:25:37 PM nd 2003/11/21 15:25:37 Modified:.Tag: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH STATUS Log: vote

Re: [PATCH] bug #18756 ldap cache and shared memory - cache init

, it appeared that st-cache_rmm is always set before any call to util_ald_create_cache(). Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thursday, December 11, 2003 1:51:49 AM Hi, st-cache_rmm is now

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/experimental mod_charset_lite.c

-1 Please use some other #define. This won't build with Metrowerks on NetWare. Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Monday, December 15, 2003 8:18:05 AM On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 02:24

[PATCH]Setting the content length on files over 2 gig...

confused and gives up while Mozilla continues up to the 4 gig size before stopping. Opera also seemed to get confused at around the 2 gig point. Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com protocol.c.patch

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/loggers mod_log_forensic.c

, could somebody that knows more about the Linux makefiles than I do, make this change? Thanks, Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Saturday, January 03, 2004 12:18:54 PM bnicholes

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/loggers mod_log_forensic.c

test_char.h +APR_ADDTO(INCLUDES, [-I\$(top_builddir)/server]) +fi + APACHE_MODULE(logio, input and output logging, , , most) APACHE_MODPATH_FINISH Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com

Re: [Bug?] cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server core.c

sendfile() and it all works fine). Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tuesday, January 13, 2004 4:04:30 PM Woha... At 11:50 AM 1/8/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: bnicholes2004/01/08

Re: [Bug?] cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server core.c

is that at least some of it, if not all, could be cleaned up. But then I am not on a platform that has sendfile() so it is hard for me to tell what is required and what isn't. Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http

Re: mod_ldap/util_ldap Issues...

the caching directives. The difference is that NetWare does not use shared memory for the cache. Since the caching directives only appears to be a problem on shared memory platforms, this leads me to believe that the proposed patch should resolve this issue. Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer

Re: mod_ldap/util_ldap Issues...

that have set up auth_ldap using non-anonymous bind. I haven't heard of any problems from them on our devnet forums or from our support engineers. Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com [EMAIL PROTECTED

Time for 2.0.49, WAS: Re: Time for 1.3.30??

+1 Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wednesday, February 18, 2004 10:34:44 AM On Wed, 2004-02-18 at 15:28, Jim Jagielski wrote: I'd like to float the idea of releasing 1.3.30

Re: apr/apr-util python dependence

in sync with gen-uri-delims.py so those of us that can't run python can still build? A shell script isn't possible either, since NetWare also doesn't have a shell. Our options are C, Perl or PHP. Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business

Re: apr/apr-util python dependence

it better. So I guess it's back to the religious battle. ;-) Python is just yet another build tool that we need to install. But for NetWare, getting rid of the build, copy, run, copy, continue build headache is worth it. Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading

Re: apr/apr-util python dependence

table, the only other build problems that we have are in httpd with the chartables.c and test_chars.h. Since these files are also generated by utilities, we still have the build,copy,run,copy,build problem. Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net

mod_ssl TLS/SSL upgrade...

especially, libwww exercises through perl-framework.) Any disagreement? The current patch that applies to cvs HEAD is attached. Bill Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com ssl-upgrade.patch Description

Re: mod_ssl TLS/SSL upgrade...

I would really like to get the TLS/SSL upgrade functionality into the 2.0.49 release. If Sander is wanting to start the relase on Monday, I would like to do whatever is easiest to get this patch in. Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/arch/netware mod_nw_ssl.c

and mod_nw_ssl is not able to get as much detailed information about SSL because it is built into the NetWare OS (which is the reason why mod_nw_ssl exists). Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: 2.0.49 (rc1) tarballs available for testing

+1 Netware Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tuesday, March 09, 2004 10:02:03 AM Hi, There are 2.0.49-rc1 tarballs available for testing at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist

Re: 2.0.49 (rc1) tarballs available for testing

We discovered a problem on NetWare with random bytes generation on older hardware that I would like to have included in rc2 if possible. If not, I can release a patch for it after 2.0.49 release. apr/misc/netware/rand.c: r1.7.2.2 Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server/mpm/worker mpm.h worker.c

directive names with similar functionality? Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wednesday, March 10, 2004 8:57:50 PM trawick 2004/03/10 19:57:50 Modified:.CHANGES

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server/mpm/worker mpm.h worker.c

Sounds good, I will review the change and get mpm_netware fixed up to use the mpm_common.c directive. Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Monday, March 15, 2004 4:10:11 PM Jeff

2.0.49 (rc3) tarballs available, WAS: Re: 2.0.49 (rc2) tarballsavailable

Looking good on NetWare Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wednesday, March 17, 2004 12:31:21 PM On Wed, 2004-03-17 at 20:16, Andre Breiler wrote: Hi, On Sat, 13 Mar 2004, Sander

Re: Any 1.3.30 tarball feeback??

If you are going to retag, can you also include the htdocs/manual/netware.html patch (r1.9) that I committed last week. This doc change describes the new Netware makefiles that made it into 1.3.30, but the doc didn't. Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/experimental util_ldap.c

this commited and backported soon. Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tuesday, April 13, 2004 5:44:19 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: bnicholes2004/03/31 14:56:08 Modified

Re: Request for feedback - UseCanonicalPort

it should construct the self-referential information from the client. By skipping the port information held in the connection record, it isn't doing what it claims to be doing. Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/experimental util_ldap.c

significantly help to resolve the problem that you are seeing. Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thursday, May 13, 2004 8:51:34 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Modified:modules

Re: Request for feedback - UseCanonicalPort

to be added to 2.0 as it does in 1.3 and 2.1. Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wednesday, May 12, 2004 7:28:24 AM On May 11, 2004, at 6:18 PM, Brad Nicholes wrote: +1 to Bill's comment

Re: Request for feedback - UseCanonicalPort

Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wednesday, May 12, 2004 11:32:30 AM Do you mean that 2.0 now works correctly? In that case maybe the short-term is to use the 2.0 method for both 1.3 and 2.1

Re: Request for feedback - UseCanonicalPort

no port and a valid port value of 0. This is the reason why the backport proposal has stagnated in the STATUS file. I don't know what the correct answer is but I do believe that honoring the physical port number is a good thing and should be checked somehow. Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software

Re: [util_ldap.c] Your recent correction in util_ldap_cache_checkuserid().

which will force it to be reinitialized the next time that it is used. Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com Denis Gervalle [EMAIL PROTECTED] Monday, May 10, 2004 3:33:08 PM Brad, After a second look

Re: Status of 1.3.31...

No negative feedback. +1 so far on NetWare Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Monday, May 10, 2004 11:55:50 AM Looking for negative (do-not-release) feedback for the 1.3.31 RC

Re: [PATCH AP13] ./src/os/netware/ApacheCore.imp - missing symbol

Done, thanks Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Monday, May 17, 2004 7:59:21 AM Hi, need ap_escape_logitem exported for a third-party module: --- ApacheCore.imp.orig Thu Apr 15 17

Re: LDAP SDK behaviour and mod_ldap

, LDAP: SSL trusted certificate authority file type - %s, Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com Graham Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Friday, May 21, 2004 2:11:17 PM Brad Nicholes wrote: My feeling

Re:util_ldap [Bug 29217] - Remove references to calloc() and free()

, you lose the web server. Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wednesday, June 09, 2004 4:43:22 PM DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB

Re: util_ldap [Bug 29217] - Remove references to calloc() and free()

, you have to be able to control it at a much finer level than apr_pool allows you. Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com Graham Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wednesday, June 09, 2004 5:51:47 PM Brad Nicholes

Re: util_ldap [Bug 29217] - Remove references to calloc() and free()

rather than trying to retrofit it with pools and reslists. Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thursday, June 10, 2004 4:59:30 AM Brad Nicholes wrote: I guess that is a possibility

Re: util_ldap [Bug 29217] - Remove references to calloc() and free()

to this model. The pieces can come can go, but you can never really clear the whole thing out and reuse it because the operation never actually ends. Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com Graham Leggett [EMAIL

Re: util_ldap [Bug 29217] - Remove references to calloc() and free()

, newnode); LDAP_CACHE_UNLOCK(); } It appears to be acquiring a read lock but then inserts a new node into the cache. Shouldn't it be acquiring a write lock before doing an insert? Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business

Re: util_ldap [Bug 29217] - Remove references to calloc() and free()

the cache at the same time. True? Since NetWare is multi-threaded only, we never see this problem. Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thursday, June 10, 2004 5:07:52 PM

Re: util_ldap [Bug 29217] - Remove references to calloc() and free()

code. I am sure that we can take advantage of what has been done in mod_ssl and other places that have to mutex protect shared memory. It is actually working great on NetWare at the moment but then we don't use shared memory and we are multi-threaded only. Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software

Re: huge memory leak in 2.0.x

assuming that it would be needed later. The MaxMemFree directive allowed the memory pool manager to release excess memory rather than allowing it to hang around. Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com [EMAIL

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/experimental util_ldap.c

Do the docs need to be updated for this change? Allowing relative paths to be resolved against ServerRoot seemed like fairly standard procedure. Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS

or a separate address space. The default is the current address space. Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tuesday, June 22, 2004 5:45:58 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: clar2004/06/21 12

NetWare and protected address space (was: Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS)

and much easier to run things in kernel address space. It is just the nature of the OS. What's the benefit? Performance, scalability and yes, security. (OK, that sounds a lot like a marketing line, but its true) Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/experimental util_ldap.c util_ldap_cache.c util_ldap_cache.h

No, I didn't change anything that would allow for anonymous shared memory. This should probably check for a NULL before calling apr_file_remove(). Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/experimental util_ldap.c util_ldap_cache.c util_ldap_cache.h

ptemp shouldn't ever be NULL on a post_config, right? I just fixed the code so that it checks for a NULL file name before calling apr_file_remove(). Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com [EMAIL

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/experimental util_ldap.c

was in /experiemental, the full httpd source would be needed to build an Apache module that used util_ldap (unless I am misunderstanding something). True. It just seems a little strange. Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/experimental util_ldap.c

Agreed, and interested in other thoughts as well. Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com Graham Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Monday, June 28, 2004 11:23:57 AM Brad Nicholes wrote: I was hoping to avoid

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/docs/manual/platform netware.xml

listen addr:port so that if the request to upgrade is made, Winsock has the information it needs to upgrade the socket. Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wednesday, July 14, 2004 11:17

Re: FW: Bug in AuthLDAPURL?

parameters. Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Friday, July 16, 2004 11:15:32 AM [Forwarding on behalf of Tair-Shian Chou who has problems getting his mail through to [EMAIL PROTECTED] list

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS

and only be available in 2.1. Thoughts? Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tuesday, August 03, 2004 7:09:01 PM minfrin 2004/08/03 18:09:01 Modified:.Tag

Re: httpd-2.2 release roadmap v0.1

serious security fixes, the story would be upgrade to 2.2.x because that is where the fix is. Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thursday, August 12, 2004 2:53:05 PM At 03:15 PM 8/12

Re: New Mod_Proxy - some testing/looking

char *proxyhost, apr_port_t proxyport)) notice the difference in the parameter lists. The declaration has 6 parameters and the actual handler only has 5. The handler is missing proxy_worker * as the second parameter. How does this compile or even work on any platform? Brad Brad Nicholes Senior

Where is the AJP code...

to be migrated to the httpd project? Why is the AJPLIB code in a test directory? Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/aaa NWGNUauthnzldap mod_authnz_ldap.c NWGNUmakefile

a authz_groupfile rather than forced to use the directory, this directive didn't seem necessary anymore. Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tuesday, August 17, 2004 5:33:08 PM bnicholes2004

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/aaa NWGNUauthnzldap mod_authnz_ldap.c NWGNUmakefile

module directories to be the new home of util_ldap? Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tuesday, August 17, 2004 5:41:12 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Re-structure the auth_ldap

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/aaa NWGNUauthnzldap mod_authnz_ldap.c NWGNUmakefile

BTW, since I am not a Linux makefile guru, the new authnz_ldap module has not been added to the Linux build scripts. Can somebody make the appropriate changes to the makefiles? Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/aaa NWGNUauthnzldap mod_authnz_ldap.c NWGNUmakefile

should probably be thrown into the attic so we can at least preserve the history. Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wednesday, August 18, 2004 7:24:13 AM Brad Nicholes wrote: BTW

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/docs/manual/style/xsl common.xsl

Oops, my mistake. This wasn't suppose to be checked in. Reverting now. Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wednesday, August 25, 2004 2:15:25 PM bnicholes2004/08/25 13:15:25

Re: Time for 2.0.51 and 2.1.0

Same here. I need another vote for the util_ldap.c backport Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thursday, August 26, 2004 11:21:22 AM Sander Striker wrote: Hi, I'm going

Re: Apache 2.0.51 util_ldap

switching between global and local locks anyway. This would require #ifdef'ing the code for particular platforms or MPM's which isn't a good thing. Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/ldap util_ldap_cache_mgr.c

in the patch file so that the backport matches the current state of the code. Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Monday, September 20, 2004 7:15:27 AM See my util_ldap.c patch. Whether

Re: new config organization for 2.1

out, but it seems much easier to read as a single file. Maybe just some additional formatting and comments to distinguish MPM directives from Language from Vhosts, etc. is needed. Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http

Re: new config organization for 2.1

interested, I don't have a better suggestion yet so I will have to think about it some more. Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com

segfault patch for util_ldap (was:Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS)

Since this patch was the last of three fixes for util_ldap and didn't make it into 2.0.52 because of lack of votes and since it fixes a segfault in util_ldap, now that it has the required votes, I would suggest we backport the fix and post the patch in /dist/httpd/patches. Any objections?

Re: segfault patch for util_ldap (was:Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS)

PM At 04:59 PM 9/28/2004, Brad Nicholes wrote: Since this patch was the last of three fixes for util_ldap and didn't make it into 2.0.52 because of lack of votes and since it fixes a segfault in util_ldap, now that it has the required votes, I would suggest we backport the fix and post the patch

Re: segfault patch for util_ldap (was:Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tuesday, September 28, 2004 5:31:47 PM At 06:12 PM 9/28/2004, Brad Nicholes wrote: I wouldn't consider posting the patch if there was going to be another release in a week and a half, but that usually isn't the case and a patch for an experimental module usually isn't

Re: AuthProviderAlias and mod_authn_file

So it sounds like there are two questions being asked. First, what non-ldap usages are there for authnAlias and second why doesn't the configuration below work? I'll answer the second question first. Given the configuration block below, I don't know why it doesn't work. I just

Re: Clarification on how check_user_id hook works

On 10/10/2006 at 8:58 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Eric Covener [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/10/06, Javier Sagrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, i can write my modules, based on modules that i know will have a conflict with mine using the if ... but that is a little limited, i just find

Re: PATCH #40075 - using ldap groups that contain DNs and usernames for AuthZ

On 11/7/2006 at 1:07 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Johanna Bromberg Craig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I've addressed the feedback I received on my patch from Brad Nicholes as follows: I've restored AuthLDAPGroupAttribute to its former syntax and added a new directive

Re: how mod_authnz_ldap ldap provider is supposed to work as basic auth provider?

On 11/25/2006 at 4:37 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Piotr Wadas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Cite from http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_authnz_ldap.html The authn_ldap authentication provider can be enabled through the AuthBasicProvider directive using the ldap value. This

Re: PATCH #40075 - using ldap groups that contain DNs and usernames for AuthZ

On 12/11/2006 at 12:36 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Johanna Bromberg Craig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey, I've addressed the last rounds of comments to my patch to mod_authnz_ldap. I haven't heard anything for a week, so I'm wondering, can someone please review these changes?

Re: PATCH #40075 - using ldap groups that contain DNs and usernames for AuthZ

On Mon, Dec 4, 2006 at 1:00 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Johanna Bromberg Craig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I've addressed the feedback I received on my patch from Brad Nicholes as follows: I've reviewed all instances of util_ldap_compare() and util_ldap_cache_comparedn

Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review

On 1/6/2007 at 12:41 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ will soon (within the hour, upon resync) contain the following tarballs for approval httpd-2.2.4.tar.bz2 [.asc|.md5] httpd-2.2.4.tar.gz [.asc|.md5]

Re: [PATCH] enable another basedir during 'make install' for NetWare

On 1/20/2007 at 8:05 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Guenter Knauf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Brad, I have just created a patch which changes a couple of NWGNU* files in order to make it possible to specify another basedir during a 'make install' than using the hardcoded 'Apache2'.

Re: Bug [and proposed patch] for mod_ldap

On 1/22/2007 at 11:45 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Fenlason, Josh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm running into a problem with mod_ldap on Windows. When I try to authenticate without passing in a username, I get a 500 server error. Since the browser doesn't get back a 401, it caches the

Re: util_ldap.c use of hardcoded sizelimit on ldap_search_ext_s causing error

On 2/19/2007 at 9:29 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2/15/07, David Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Currently util_ldap.c has a hard coded -1 as the search limit value (meaning infinite/no limit) on ldap_search_ext_s() calls. Some platforms cannot

Re: svn commit: r509629 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS

On 2/20/2007 at 11:32 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2/20/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: bnicholes Date: Tue Feb 20 08:23:19 2007 New Revision: 509629 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=509629 Log: vote

Re: util_ldap.c use of hardcoded sizelimit on ldap_search_ext_s causing error

On 2/22/2007 at 7:12 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], David Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How about something alone these lines? It assumes there is nobody with LDAP_DEFAULT_LIMIT undefined AND LDAP_NO_LIMIT defined, but still supports and wishes to use the -1 value. ---

Re: util_ldap.c use of hardcoded sizelimit on ldap_search_ext_s causing error

What LDAP client SDK does z/OS use? (Novell, OpenLDAP, Netscape, Other???) Brad On 2/22/2007 at 12:52 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], David Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Its the z/OS, has LDAP_NO_SIZELIMIT defined. Does not have nor support LDAP_DEFAULT_SIZELIMIT On 2/22/07, Brad

Re: util_ldap.c use of hardcoded sizelimit on ldap_search_ext_s causing error

of keeping it in util_ldap.c 4) Or some complicated(?) conf magic that would involve getting a handle and then calling ldap_set_option(ldap, LDAP_OPT_SIZELIMIT, -1); and setting APR_LDAP_DEFAULT_SIZELIMIT to -1 or 0 accordingly. On 2/23/07, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What

Re: util_ldap.c use of hardcoded sizelimit on ldap_search_ext_s causing error

Looks good, I think I like your first suggestion better, putting the #ifdef in apr_ldap.h.in. This seems a little more straight forward rather than hiding the value in configure. Brad On 3/1/2007 at 7:07 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], David Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How about:

Re: util_ldap.c use of hardcoded sizelimit on ldap_search_ext_s causing error

support for LDAP v2.0 toolkits. On 3/2/07, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Looks good, I think I like your first suggestion better, putting the #ifdef in apr_ldap.h.in. This seems a little more straight forward rather than hiding the value in configure. Brad On 3/1/2007 at 7:07

Re: [PATCH] add experimental modules makefiles for NetWare

On 3/9/2007 at 11:22 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Guenter Knauf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Brad, can you please commit the attached makefiles to the 'experimental' modules folder, and patch the existing NWGNUmakefile in order to pick up the new ones? Since its no code change probably

Re: bug with Apache 1.3 NetWare build system

On 4/19/2007 at 11:36 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Guenter Knauf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Brad, I've just found that we have same bug in the AP13 build system as what I fixed long time ago with the AP2x build system already; in each NWGNUmakefile.mak you can read: # # These flags

Re: mod_ftp, status and progress?

On 4/26/2007 at 4:16 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Guenter Knauf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Wouldn't it be better to focus on 2.2.x and onwards? OK, there's a lot of people still running 1.3 and 2.0, but that doesn't mean that we have to make it run on all of them... I'm all for

Re: SatisfyOne

On 4/27/2007 at 11:30 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Patrick Welche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Basically, bug or configuration error? Using httpd trunk 529626, of Apr 19 2007, I tried a FAQ configuration with the new authentication framework: Directory /usr/local/share/httpd/htdocs/learn

Re: SatisfyOne

On 4/30/2007 at 9:54 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/27/07, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's beginning to look like Order, Allow, Deny, Satisfy can't be deprecated after all. However I still think that there is a usefulness

Re: SatisfyOne

On 4/30/2007 at 10:13 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Patrick Welche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 03:44:08PM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote: On 4/27/2007 at 11:30 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Patrick Welche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... Using httpd trunk 529626

Re: svn commit: r534533 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: include/http_core.h modules/aaa/mod_access_compat.c modules/aaa/mod_auth.h modules/aaa/mod_authz_core.c modules/aaa/mod_authz_default.c server/core.c

On 5/2/2007 at 11:47 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/2/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: bnicholes Date: Wed May 2 09:31:39 2007 New Revision: 534533 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=534533 Log: re-introduce

Re: svn commit: r534533 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: include/http_core.h modules/aaa/mod_access_compat.c modules/aaa/mod_auth.h modules/aaa/mod_authz_core.c modules/aaa/mod_authz_default.c server/core.c s

On 5/2/2007 at 1:47 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/2/07, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah, that's where I mentioned that things might look a little confusing. There actually is a good reason to have both and yes some

Re: svn commit: r563196 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS

On 8/6/2007 at 12:28 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/6/07, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ummm... These didn't have 3 +1 votes. So why were they applied and committed?? I think for platform-specific code we've been okay with a

Re: authnz_ldap in 2.2.x

On 8/29/2007 at 8:28 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Eric Covener [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: mod_authnz_ldap in 2.2.x doesn't track whether or not it has seen any applicable 'Require ldap-*' entries in the requires list, and also doesn't explicitly accept valid-user (despite a commnt) Other

Re: authnz_ldap in 2.2.x

On 8/29/2007 at 3:14 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Eric Covener [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/29/07, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The only real reason why you have to set LDAP to non-authoritative when using LDAP authn only, is because LDAP had to combine both authn and authz

Re: authnz_ldap in 2.2.x

On 8/29/2007 at 7:51 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Eric Covener [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In 2.2.x If authz_XXX are one of dbm, owner, or groupfile they track the list of requires and decline if they don't see any they're responsible for -- this isn't a crap shoot of module ordering in

Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate tarballs for review

On 9/4/2007 at 3:29 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Available for your testing pleasure, 3, count 'em, 3 Apache HTTP Server release candidate tarballs, located, as expected at: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ This vote will run through

Re: As we contemplate what to fix, and how to roll out 2.4 and 3.0

On 10/1/2007 at 4:52 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Give that some thought :) One thing I'm pondering is a 2.3.0 alpha in the near future. If only to give the we stay back at version n.x-1 crowd something to

Re: mod_ldap: server_config structure part of the API?

On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 2:33 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Eric Covener [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All, mod_ldap has it's own server_config struct defined in httpd/include/util_ldap.c -- does this location implicitly make the server config structure part of the API? If So, what kind

Re: Apache HTTP Server 1.3.34 prerelease tarballs

+1 NetWare Brad On 10/13/2005 at 6:34:52 pm, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Look for the Apache HTTP Server 1.3.34 prerelease tarballs in: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Please test :)

  1   2   3   4   5   >