distcache (was RE: consider reopening 1.3)

out the remaining issues in distcache shortly after. So ... if there's anyone on the apache side who'd be prepared to look deeper into this and discuss integration with apache, please make contact with me off the list. Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/

Re: distcache support in mod_ssl for 2.1

Biensur. :-) Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/

Re: distcache support in mod_ssl for 2.1

things up. (Yes, I promise to turn off the tabs too :-). Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/

Re: mod_ssl not sending Alert upon close ?

was just stewing on a similar problem with openssl's builtin s_server application - in that case, the braindamage is in s_server.c's use of SSL_CTX_set_quiet_shutdown(ctx,1). Perhaps apache2 is doing the same thing? Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/

Re: [PATCH] OpenSSL dynamic engines under 2.0.48

, they could wait until 0.9.8 is out and then this basic use-case will be available transparently, without any change to what's there now. Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/

STATUS (was [PATCH] OpenSSL dynamic engines under 2.0.48)

time to do that), but the current comment is likely to lead someone to doing something very painful to themselves. Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/

Re: [PATCH] SSLCryptoDevCtl support

() are consolidated. -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/

Re: [PROPOSAL] Move httpd to the subversion repository

On March 16, 2004 09:10 pm, Kean Johnston wrote: You can get the latest from ftp://ftp.sco.com/pub/openserver5/opensrc Its one-stop shopping for most of the useful open source libraries. Do we need to buy a license? Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http

Re: [PROPOSAL] Move httpd to the subversion repository

tools coming from the sco.com domain. Anyway, irony is better than flaming, surely? (I'll avoid comments about it being a free world, as the courts have yet to decide that one.) Cheers, Geoff PS: Smile, boys will be Boies. -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/

Re: [OT] sco stuff (was: [PROPOSAL] Move httpd to the subversion repository)

: If SCO loses their case, would that be a Gargantuan Profiteering Loss? -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/

Re: Error messages from ssl_scache_shmcb

hacking in earnest on this some time this weekend. Cheers, Geoff [1] BTW Madhu, this is someone from your neck of the woods (based on the domain name, at least). Just in case you feel like syncing up about this. -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/

Re: Error messages from ssl_scache_shmcb

into this and let you know what I find (though don't hold out much hope until early next week at the earliest, the next few days promise to be pretty busy). Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/

Re: [STATUS] (httpd-2.0) Wed Mar 24 23:45:11 EST 2004

occasion and had no response. Why is this comment here? From who and where does it come? Could it please be either (a) discussed, or (b) removed? It happens to make very little sense, but I'd certainly be keen to hear if someone has any rational logic to the contrary. Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe

Re: [STATUS] (httpd-2.0) Wed Mar 24 23:45:11 EST 2004

fundamental change may be a worthwhile anyway ... sigh OK, I will report back on this once I get down into the bowels of this code again chasing Ken's bug. Does this mean I've got some volunteers to help test this if I do undertake to rewire the cache internals? :-) Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe

Re: [STATUS] (httpd-2.0) Wed Mar 24 23:45:11 EST 2004

OR is line 613 wrong ? Neither. Line 610 is the reason, even if I wasn't able to rite my english proper like at a time the riting did. :-) Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/

Re: [PATCH] Flag OpenSSL to NOT store sessions

is enabled along with SSLSessionCache. Makes sense, the server should not use any per-process caching. If your patch lets session caching work but doesn't leak, that would indicate you've got the right flags. Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/

Re: OCSP addition

interesting in testing that code, or even work on it ? I really can't help here, but I wish you the best with it. Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/

Re: [PATCH] Fix SEGV in ssl_scache_shmcb.c

, but it should be independent of the fix. Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/ diff -urN httpd-2.0.49/modules/ssl/ssl_scache_shmcb.c httpd-2.0.49-patched/modules/ssl/ssl_scache_shmcb.c --- httpd-2.0.49/modules/ssl/ssl_scache_shmcb.c 2004-02-09 15:53:20.0 -0500

Re: r382799 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ssl/ssl_scache_shmcb.c

suddenly become the victim of a drive-by hardware donation, it won't be me doing this. This version is also easier on the eyes (smaller too) BTW. Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/ Self-interest and materialistic desire are parts of who we are, but not all

Re: Apache with Security Processor - Interesting

(and in any other ways they come up with without needing the code changed). Let me know if this isn't already in CVS because I had a diff floating around somewhere that did this. Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/

Re: Apache with Security Processor - Interesting

On October 21, 2004 01:05 pm, Madhusudan Mathihalli wrote: On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 20:10:53 -0400, Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Did the control-command support ever make it into a cvs-worthy form? Nope - I don't believe it is in the CVS. Can you re-send the patch ? Um, all I have

Re: [STATUS] (httpd-2.1) Wed Apr 13 23:46:37 2005

, I'd love a copy :-) Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/ Greedy Genghis George, Guru of God and Guns.

Re: [STATUS] (httpd-2.1) Wed Apr 13 23:46:37 2005

? Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/ Greedy Genghis George, Guru of God and Guns.

[PATCH] openssl configuration

use for these was because nothing up until that point had run any compiler or link tests on the guesses made by configure. That's now changed so these checks are pointless. -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/ Index: acinclude.m4

Re: [PATCH] openssl configuration

? Or compability layers built on top of something else? Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/

Re: [PATCH] openssl configuration

Hi Thom, * Thom May ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: * Geoff Thorpe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : It would perhaps make sense to provide a --force-ssl-ver type of option that would bypass version checks, and then have any version checking failure text point out the existence of --force-ssl-ver

Re: [PATCH] openssl configuration

toolkits. Those areas will continue to shrink :-) Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/

[PATCH] openssl configuration (v2)

checks that my changes remove? Any/all feedback most welcome. Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/ Index: acinclude.m4 === RCS file: /home/cvspublic/httpd-2.0/acinclude.m4,v retrieving

Re: [STATUS] (httpd-2.0) Wed Mar 5 23:45:12 EST 2003

if anyone's interested. Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/

Re: [PATCH] openssl configuration (v2)

-- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/ Index: acconfig.h === RCS file: /home/cvspublic/httpd-2.0/acconfig.h,v retrieving revision 1.1 diff -u -r1.1 acconfig.h --- acconfig.h 31 Jan 2002 14:51:37 - 1.1

Re: [PATCH] openssl configuration (v2)

reasonable? (Note, I've still left the old version stubbed in - I prefer to leave the diff readable until someone's ready to start using the word commit). Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/ Index: acconfig.h

Re: mod_ssl to-do items

Hi (again :-), * Justin Erenkrantz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: --On Thursday, March 6, 2003 12:42 PM -0500 Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] * session cache store should be pluggable I'd like to speak with the person who's behind this, as I'm waiting for (Pardon me while

Re: mod_ssl to-do items

, but that's another spiel for another day). Thanks for getting back to me about this. Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/

Re: [PATCH] openssl configuration (v2)

vendor use SSL-C? These would seem the obvious avenues to me, but I don't want to pre-empt whatever communications are already going w.r.t. SSL-C support. Just let me know if I can help in some way. - any objections Not from me, but then that should come as no surprise ... Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff

Re: [PATCH] openssl versions?

of the existing behaviour is another question. Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/

Re: [PATCH] remove shmht from mod_ssl

the shmcb code more robust against such issues before pulling the plug on shmht. Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/

Update on distcache support

-- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/ Index: LAYOUT === RCS file: /home/cvspublic/httpd-2.0/LAYOUT,v retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.2 LAYOUT --- LAYOUT 8 Dec 2002 21:05:55 - 1.2 +++ LAYOUT

Re: mod_ssl broken as DSO in HEAD

. If this continues to resist your efforts, please let me know how I can reproduce and debug this (in linux) from the apache point of view. I'm a bit shallow in my knowledge of apache's internals and how to track its loading, unloading, memory handling, etc. Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: mod_ssl broken as DSO in HEAD

, and of course YMMV :-) Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/

Re: OpenSSL locking was Re: mod_ssl broken as DSO in HEAD

into the request-tracking system. BTW: Once we're over there, Richard Levitte may be able to provide better comments than I on this locking stuff, particularly as the dynlock stuff was (IIRC) his creation. Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/

Re: --enable-distcache

Hi Philip, Sifting through a tonne of mail that has been spooling away on the side for the last few months. In particular, I saw this post of yours w.r.t. distcache last november, and I didn't see any reply on the list; On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 06:00 -0500, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: [snip]

overview of MPMs?

Hi all, Just wondering if anyone has a link or howto that would give me some background info on the interface with the different MPM modes/implementations? I'm not even sure where the different implementations are in the source tree, but I'm curious to take a look if someone could point me in the

Re: overview of MPMs?

On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 13:52 +1000, Graham Dumpleton wrote: 2008/4/11 Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi all, Just wondering if anyone has a link or howto that would give me some background info on the interface with the different MPM modes/implementations? I'm not even sure where

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41364] chunk-size contains space

On Friday 01 August 2008 19:51:48 William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41364 Roy T. Fielding [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added