Re: svn commit: r1875349 - /httpd/site/trunk/tools/roll.sh

On 18/03/2020 11:09, Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 3/18/20 9:36 AM, jfcl...@apache.org wrote: Author: jfclere Date: Wed Mar 18 08:36:46 2020 New Revision: 1875349 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1875349=rev Log: Add sha512 Modified: httpd/site/trunk/tools/roll.sh Modified:

Re: svn commit: r1875349 - /httpd/site/trunk/tools/roll.sh

On 18/03/2020 14:11, jean-frederic clere wrote: On 18/03/2020 11:09, Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 3/18/20 9:36 AM, jfcl...@apache.org wrote: Author: jfclere Date: Wed Mar 18 08:36:46 2020 New Revision: 1875349 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1875349=rev Log: Add sha512 Modified

Re: svn commit: r1875349 - /httpd/site/trunk/tools/roll.sh

On 18/03/2020 11:09, Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 3/18/20 9:36 AM, jfcl...@apache.org wrote: Author: jfclere Date: Wed Mar 18 08:36:46 2020 New Revision: 1875349 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1875349=rev Log: Add sha512 Modified: httpd/site/trunk/tools/roll.sh Modified:

Re: sha512 in releases?

On 18/03/2020 08:20, Giovanni Bechis wrote: On 3/17/20 1:39 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote: Hi, Are we planing to add sha512 in our release? vcpkg (https://github.com/microsoft/vcpkg) for example uses sha512 to check the files it downloads. I think we should go that way even if it's

sha512 in releases?

Hi, Are we planing to add sha512 in our release? vcpkg (https://github.com/microsoft/vcpkg) for example uses sha512 to check the files it downloads. -- Cheers Jean-Frederic

Re: 2.4.42 soon?

On 13/03/2020 13:51, Eric Covener wrote: Looks like STATUS is in good shape. Any cycles Daniel or Jim? +1 ;-) -- Cheers Jean-Frederic

Re: error on fedora31 when configure --enable-maintainer-mode

On 26/02/2020 18:50, Giovanni Bechis wrote: On 2/26/20 5:07 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote: Hi, I have 2 errors when compile on fedora31 with configure --enable-maintainer-mod. Attached a possible patch, comments? Thanks, they are both fixed in trunk in 2 separate commits, see https

error on fedora31 when configure --enable-maintainer-mode

Hi, I have 2 errors when compile on fedora31 with configure --enable-maintainer-mod. Attached a possible patch, comments? -- Cheers Jean-Frederic Index: modules/filters/mod_brotli.c === --- modules/filters/mod_brotli.c

Re: svn commit: r1801594 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy_wstunnel.xml modules/proxy/mod_proxy_wstunnel.c

://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBCS-291, I will dig again in the problem later today. On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 2:58 PM jean-frederic clere wrote: On 07/12/2017 07:25 PM, Jacob Champion wrote: On 07/11/2017 05:36 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote: I think it's quite hazardous to use/allow ANY and would prefer

X509v3 CRL Distribution Points: crlDistributionPoints in mod_ssl supported?

Hi, After a quick look it seems this is not something we are supporting, is that correct? -- Cheers Jean-Frederic

Re: configure --enable-maintainer-mode gives errors on fedora 30

On 01/07/2019 17:59, Joe Orton wrote: > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 07:29:51PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Just for the records, this is apparently already pat of r1809037 on trunk. > > Stefan are you planning to merge the changes here to 2.4.x any time > soon? If not can I get a

Re: svn commit: r1862014 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy_hcheck.c

On 24/06/2019 21:13, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > Le 24/06/2019 à 18:29, jfcl...@apache.org a écrit : >> Author: jfclere >> Date: Mon Jun 24 16:29:22 2019 >> New Revision: 1862014 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1862014=rev >> Log: >> Set connectiontimeout for mod_proxy_hcheck. >> Fix

Re: configure --enable-maintainer-mode gives errors on fedora 30

On 18/06/2019 19:29, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > Hi, > > Just for the records, this is apparently already pat of r1809037 on trunk. Coorect should I ask for a back port? > > CJ > > Le 18/06/2019 à 14:52, jean-frederic clere a écrit : >> On 18/06/2019 14:38, Stefan

Re: configure --enable-maintainer-mode gives errors on fedora 30

m 18.06.2019 um 14:33 schrieb jean-frederic clere : >> >> Hi, >> >> I have spotted a bunch of errors when using ./configure >> --enable-maintainer-mode on the branch 2.4.x, do we plan to fix those? >> >> Some are really errors (probably core with bad h

configure --enable-maintainer-mode gives errors on fedora 30

Hi, I have spotted a bunch of errors when using ./configure --enable-maintainer-mode on the branch 2.4.x, do we plan to fix those? Some are really errors (probably core with bad httpd,conf) some are more tricky... -- Cheers Jean-Frederic

Arranging mod_proxy_balancer to make it provider of balancer/worker.

Hi, I would like to be able to add worker/balancer from another module (mod_proxy_cluster) basically using a part of balancer_handler() to make a provider (like insert_update_worker(params)), any objections or suggestions? -- Cheers Jean-Frederic

Re: ApacheCon call for presentations, httpd content

and an alternate OCSP stapling > implementation. Maybe that is something to mention as well. > OK I will propose something tomorrow, I can also explain on the OCSP and its limitations. > Cheers, Stefan > >> Am 08.05.2019 um 19:55 schrieb jean-frederic clere >> : >

Re: ApacheCon call for presentations, httpd content

On 04/05/2019 11:53, Stefan Eissing wrote: > >> Am 02.05.2019 um 16:39 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri : >> >>> Personally, I'd like to see a presentation on using mod_md, and perhaps >>> something on the benefits of, and use of, http2 in httpd? > > If anyone wants to present about that and has

Re: Plan to add sandbox branch

On 29/11/2018 07:02, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > Le 28/11/2018 à 02:33, Daniel Ruggeri a écrit : >> Hi, Jim; >> I'm coming up empty on a search against the Google-machine for SURVEY >> protocol. Any pointers you can share? >> > Hi > > Not sure if the answers already posted are what you are

Re: Load balancing and load determination

On 05/11/2018 16:58, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 7:48 AM jean-frederic clere <mailto:jfcl...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > On 30/10/2018 13:53, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > As some of you know, one of my passions and area of focus is > &

Re: Load balancing and load determination

proxy to tomcat back-ends. See http://jfclere.blogspot.com/2009/04/ I guess I need to revisit that to use mod_prxy_balancer logic. > >> On Nov 5, 2018, at 8:48 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: >> >> On 30/10/2018 13:53, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> As some of you know,

Re: Load balancing and load determination

On 30/10/2018 13:53, Jim Jagielski wrote: > As some of you know, one of my passions and area of focus is > on the use of Apache httpd as a reverse proxy and, as such, load > balancing, failover, etc are of vital interest to me. > > One topic which I have mulling over, off and on, has been the >

SetHandler balancer-manager question.

Hi, I have started to look how to enhance mod_proxy_balancer to replace mod_cluster, the first question is it normal that a balancer without workers is NOT displayed by the handler? -- Cheers Jean-Frederic

Re: svn commit: r1844001 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ssl: mod_ssl.c ssl_engine_kernel.c ssl_private.h

On 17/10/2018 15:44, Joe Orton wrote: > On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 02:29:42PM +0200, jean-frederic clere wrote: >> One of the customer complains is that having the variables exposed like >> in StdEnvars has a huge performances cost (everything is exposed for >> each request) ,

Re: svn commit: r1844001 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ssl: mod_ssl.c ssl_engine_kernel.c ssl_private.h

On 16/10/2018 19:21, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > > On 10/16/2018 02:53 PM, jfcl...@apache.org wrote: >> Author: jfclere >> Date: Tue Oct 16 12:53:18 2018 >> New Revision: 1844001 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1844001=rev >> Log: >> And a way to custom modules to guess and extract ssl

Re: svn commit: r1844001 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ssl: mod_ssl.c ssl_engine_kernel.c ssl_private.h

On 17/10/2018 12:44, Joe Orton wrote: > On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 07:21:54PM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote: >> On 10/16/2018 02:53 PM, jfcl...@apache.org wrote: >>> Author: jfclere >>> Date: Tue Oct 16 12:53:18 2018 >>> New Revision: 1844001 >>> >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1844001=rev

Re: svn commit: r1834497 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/acinclude.m4

On 27/06/18 19:26, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > Does it make sense to favor the lib/ over the lib64/ installation of > this pkg? > Is this consistent across all directory choices? > > It seems we are missing a level of abstraction and failing to utilize AC > stock tools themselves... see my recent

Are the example in https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/mod_proxy_hcheck.html valid?

Hi, While testing we noted the doc example for ProxyHCExpr/ProxyHCTemplate might be misleading: For example: ProxyHCExpr ok234 {%{REQUEST_STATUS} =~ /^[234]/} ProxyPass "/apps" "http://backend.example.com/; hcexpr=ok234 Should be changed to something: ProxyHCExpr ok234 {%{REQUEST_STATUS}

Re: svn commit: r1810316 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod: mod_proxy.html.en mod_proxy.xml

On 10/02/2017 12:40 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: >> >> On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 11:18 AM, wrote: >>> Author: jfclere >>> Date: Mon Oct 2 09:18:50 2017 >>> New Revision: 1810316 >>> >>> URL:

making ssl_hook_Fixup_vars available to another custom module

Hi, I am looking for a solution to make the ssl_hook_Fixup_vars area available to an external module. Something in ssl_register_hooks() like: ap_register_provider(p, "mod_ssl" , "ssl_variables", "0", _hook_Fixup_vars); Would do the magic, comments? Cheers Jean-Frederic

Re: svn commit: r1801594 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy_wstunnel.xml modules/proxy/mod_proxy_wstunnel.c

On 07/12/2017 07:25 PM, Jacob Champion wrote: > On 07/11/2017 05:36 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote: >> I think it's quite hazardous to use/allow ANY and would prefer the >> upgrade_method (worker->s->upgrade) to be a list of acceptable protocols. > > I think both ANY *and* NONE are dangerous. Both of them

Re: rfc1123 aka Proxy balancer://127

On 07/10/2017 11:36 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > Hi Jean-Frederic, > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 8:56 AM, jean-frederic clere <jfcl...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> According rfc1123 the configuration: >> ProxyPass "/" "balancer://127" >> >

Re: svn commit: r1801594 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy_wstunnel.xml modules/proxy/mod_proxy_wstunnel.c

On 07/11/2017 02:36 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 1:41 PM, wrote: >> Author: jfclere >> Date: Tue Jul 11 11:41:44 2017 >> New Revision: 1801594 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1801594=rev >> Log: >> >> Add logic to read the Upgrade header and

rfc1123 aka Proxy balancer://127

Hi, According rfc1123 the configuration: ProxyPass "/" "balancer://127" BalancerMember ajp://tomcat1:8009 BalancerMember ajp://tomcat2:8009 127 looks valid but it is rejected by httpd, apr_parse_addr_port() takes 127 as port instead hostname. So addr is NULL, then I have: "AH01157:

Re: HTTP Server Hackathon/BOFs in Miami?

On 04/18/2017 08:38 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > Evaluating whether I will attend ApacheCon, the most specific reason > would be hackathon time. Or productive BoF sessions. > > Who all is planning to spend some time hacking at ACNA '17? Ideas for > projects or BoF topics? I will be there if I

Re: svn commit: r1792092 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy.xml docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy_wstunnel.xml modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c modules/proxy/mod_proxy.h modules/proxy/mod_pro

On 04/20/2017 07:20 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 1:07 PM, wrote: >> >> Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy.xml >> URL: >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/mod_proxy.xml?rev=1792092=1792091=1792092=diff >>

Re: svn commit: r1674661 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ CHANGES STATUS modules/proxy/mod_proxy_wstunnel.c

mit the patch? Cheers Jean-Frederic > > On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 6:31 AM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: >> >>> On Mar 2, 2017, at 5:58 AM, jean-frederic clere <jfcl...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> +upgr

Re: svn commit: r1674661 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ CHANGES STATUS modules/proxy/mod_proxy_wstunnel.c

On 04/19/2015 08:06 PM, j...@apache.org wrote: > Author: jim > Date: Sun Apr 19 18:06:05 2015 > New Revision: 1674661 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1674661 > Log: > Merge r1674632 from trunk: > > mod_proxy_wstunnel: Bypass the handler while the connection is not > upgraded to WebSocket, so

Re: svn commit: r1781575 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: build/PrintPath modules/ssl/mod_ssl.c modules/ssl/ssl_engine_config.c modules/ssl/ssl_engine_init.c modules/ssl/ssl_engine_ocsp.c modules/ssl/ssl_priv

On 02/20/2017 05:47 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: >> >> First you want it to be Off by default (i.e. verify the OCSP's >> responder certificate when not configured), right? >> Couldn't that break existing configurations since we

Re: svn commit: r1781575 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: build/PrintPath modules/ssl/mod_ssl.c modules/ssl/ssl_engine_config.c modules/ssl/ssl_engine_init.c modules/ssl/ssl_engine_ocsp.c modules/ssl/ssl_priv

On 02/03/2017 05:30 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 5:19 PM, wrote: >> Author: jfclere >> Date: Fri Feb 3 16:19:17 2017 >> New Revision: 1781575 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1781575=rev >> Log: >> Add Configuration for trusted OCSP responder

Re: making mod_proxy_wstunnel to support other protocol via parameters

On 12/21/2016 05:40 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Jacob Champion wrote: >> (I don't know the answer to your question in particular, but I think there >> was also discussion a while ago about a mod_proxy_tcp, which might be >> relevant to the

making mod_proxy_wstunnel to support other protocol via parameters

Hi, In fact the tunnel allows any upgradable protocol to work with mod_proxy_wstunnel, checking for WebSocket prevents it, does it make sense to allow a list or a single parameter directive to allow other protocol (for example that works with "jboss-remoting" and probably a bunch of others)?

Re: AW: Problem trying to log in a directive

On 11/28/2016 02:46 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote: > > >> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> Von: jean-frederic clere [mailto:jfcl...@gmail.com] >> Gesendet: Montag, 28. November 2016 14:41 >> An: dev@httpd.apache.org >> Betreff: Problem trying to

Problem trying to log in a directive

Hi, I have noted it isn't possible to have a directive failing and something in the log once you fail in the second pass of the directive. See attached sources (to build & install bin/apxs -i -a -c mod_test.c ) I can see the debug and warning in the first pass (output to the console) but nothing

Re: httpd track in Seville

ince last time I presented the topic (AKA in Vancover in May). Cheers Jean-Frederic > > Cheers, Stefan > >> Am 12.09.2016 um 14:28 schrieb jean-frederic clere >> <jfcl...@gmail.com>: >> >> On 08/30/2016 03:34 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: >>> As yo

Re: httpd track in Seville

On 08/30/2016 03:34 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: > As you know, the CFP for ApacheCon closes in less than 2 weeks. It would > be awesome if we could pull together an httpd track, highlighting that > httpd is still the flagship of the ASF, and is still exciting, relevant, > and alive. The last few

Re: Weird behaviour with mod_ssl and SSLCryptoDevice

On 01/06/2016 01:17 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 12:28 PM, jean-frederic clere <jfcl...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> On 12/15/2015 03:16 PM, Jan Kaluža wrote: >>> On 12/15/2015 02:16 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: >>>> Hi Jan, >>>> >

Re: Weird behaviour with mod_ssl and SSLCryptoDevice

On 12/15/2015 03:16 PM, Jan Kaluža wrote: > On 12/15/2015 02:16 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: >> Hi Jan, >> >> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Jan Kaluža wrote: >>> >>> I think I've just fixed that in . I will >>> also propose that for 2.4.x and

Re: Weird behaviour with mod_ssl and SSLCryptoDevice

On 12/14/2015 02:18 PM, Stefan Eissing wrote: > You're certain it's only loaded once? I think the issue is that it is loaded twice :-( Cheers Jean-Frederic > >> Am 14.12.2015 um 14:12 schrieb jean-frederic clere <jfcl...@gmail.com>: >> >> > >

Weird behaviour with mod_ssl and SSLCryptoDevice

Hi, I am sure I am doing something wrong, but when using a dummy crypto device to recreate a customer issue I am getting a similar issue in httpd-trunk but I am nearly sure someone would have complained here if that would be the case. Comments Jean-Frederic The stack: +++ (gdb) bt #0

Re: Weird behaviour with mod_ssl and SSLCryptoDevice

On 12/14/2015 02:12 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote: > Hi, > > I am sure I am doing something wrong, but when using a dummy crypto > device to recreate a customer issue I am getting a similar issue in > httpd-trunk but I am nearly sure someone would have complained here if > that

Re: reverse proxy wishlist

On 12/03/2015 03:59 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > I put out a call on Twitter regarding this, but wanted to > close the loop here as well. > > What would *you* like to see as new features or enhancements > w/ mod_proxy, esp reverse proxy. I was thinking about some > sort of active backend

Re: reverse proxy wishlist

On 12/03/2015 07:39 PM, Houser, Rick wrote: > I would definitely expect to see a substantial improvement if the thread > reservation could be delayed until the response headers are fully received. That is something tricky you need to mix blocking and non-blocking of have a bunch (configurable)

Re: svn commit: r1650655 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: CHANGES STATUS modules/proxy/proxy_util.c

On 01/09/2015 09:37 PM, jaillet...@apache.org wrote: > Author: jailletc36 > Date: Fri Jan 9 20:37:50 2015 > New Revision: 1650655 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1650655 > Log: > Merge r1644503 from trunk > >* mod_proxy_ajp: Fix handling of the default port (8009) in the > ProxyPass

Re: svn commit: r1650655 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: CHANGES STATUS modules/proxy/proxy_util.c

On 11/16/2015 06:04 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Are you logging DEBUG? No, I also though that was the problem and checked it ;-) Cheers Jean-Frederic > >> On Nov 16, 2015, at 11:53 AM, jean-frederic clere <jfcl...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On 01/09/2015 09:37 P

Re: proposed backport, mod_h2 github release

Hi. Just to clarify the openssl minimal version to use to have h2 working is 1.0.2c correct? Or did I miss something? Cheers Jean-Frederic

Re: modules\http2 - H2Engine directive?

On 08/24/2015 10:06 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote: Ni Norm, yes, I removed it last week If I want on VirtualHost with h2 support and another one without how should I do that? (that is for demo purpose) Cheers Jean-Frederic

Re: HTTP Server Project hackathon/BoF in Budapest?

On 08/26/2015 05:29 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: First question, will many of us be present and available during the day Wednesday ahead of the ApacheCon Core content for a hackathon and BoF, or would it be better for these things to happen on Thursday during/in the evening of Core? I will be

triggering a process recreation of a child process

Hi, Is there a way to trigger a clean recreation of a child from a module? Cheers Jean-Frederic

building trunk with VS2012

Hi, It seems some files are missing in trunk from Makefile.win +++ !ELSEIF EXIST(httpd.mak) !defined(USEDSW) +++ Is that correct or do I miss something? Cheers Jean-Frederic

Re: building trunk with VS2012

On 09/26/2013 03:14 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com mailto:traw...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 8:47 AM, jean-frederic clere jfcl...@gmail.com mailto:jfcl...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, It seems some files

Re: building trunk with VS2012

On 09/26/2013 02:49 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 8:47 AM, jean-frederic clere jfcl...@gmail.com mailto:jfcl...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, It seems some files are missing in trunk from Makefile.win +++ !ELSEIF EXIST(httpd.mak) !defined(USEDSW

Re: [VOTE] Formal deprecation of 2.0.x branch

+1 Cheers Jean-Frederic

Re: mod_proxy_html

On 10/13/2011 10:54 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: On 12.10.2011 23:56, Nick Kew wrote: On 10 Oct 2011, at 23:02, Nick Kew wrote: Any interest? Looks like a lazy consensus in favour! If you ant it a bit less lazy: +1 from me also. Regarding IP, it's mine to sign over, so that's

adding secret for proxy_ajp

Hi, In modules/proxy/ajp_header.c we have: +++ /* need to figure out how to do this if (s-secret) { if (ajp_msg_append_uint8(msg, SC_A_SECRET) || ajp_msg_append_string(msg, s-secret)) { ap_log_error(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_ERR, 0, r-server,

Re: svn commit: r1166551 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/mod_proxy_ajp.c

On 09/08/2011 02:26 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote: Ooops I have committed a new fix. Cheers Jean-Frederic

Re: svn commit: r1091330 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/configure.in

On 04/12/2011 08:06 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: On 4/12/2011 4:09 AM, jfcl...@apache.org wrote: Author: jfclere Date: Tue Apr 12 09:09:52 2011 New Revision: 1091330 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1091330view=rev Log: Allow apr and apr-util to be in 2 different location. Otherwise:

Re: [PATCH] proxy could be quieter about failures while waiting to retry a backend connection

On 09/23/2010 05:52 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: Index: modules/proxy/proxy_util.c === --- modules/proxy/proxy_util.c(revision 68) +++ modules/proxy/proxy_util.c(working copy) @@ -2057,8 +2057,8 @@

Re: trunk ping for http proxy

On 08/17/2010 05:42 AM, Paul Querna wrote: On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Andrew Oliver acoli...@gmail.com wrote: Note that it is an option, not a default setting. The problem with the heartbeat bit which Red Hat/JBoss use is the unstandardized proprietary protocol required

Re: [PATCH] tproxy2 patch to the apache 2.2.15

On 08/03/2010 04:57 PM, JeHo Park wrote: hello ~ it's my first mail to apache dev .. and i am beginner of the apache. :-) Interesting stuff... But: - The machine depend stuff in httpd usually goes to APR. (I would add the logic to APR and have a HAVE_APR_TPROXY*). - The kernel is nice but was

Re: Missing proxy_balancer feature

On 07/04/2010 04:38 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: On 7/1/2010 1:46 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: On 07/01/2010 03:14 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: On 6/30/2010 7:34 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: On 06/30/2010 04:17 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: Yet again, in class another

Re: Missing proxy_balancer feature

On 06/30/2010 04:17 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: Yet again, in class another student pointed out that the Enabled/Disabled choice in mod_proxy_balancer totally ignores the concept of quiescing, where we are taking a server offline, but continuing to serve those requests targeted by session

Re: Missing proxy_balancer feature

On 06/30/2010 04:17 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: Yet again, in class another student pointed out that the Enabled/Disabled choice in mod_proxy_balancer totally ignores the concept of quiescing, where we are taking a server offline, but continuing to serve those requests targeted by session

Re: Stop accepting PRs for 1.3?

On 04/30/2010 05:13 AM, Sander Temme wrote: Crowd, Since we have released our last release, how about we close the Apache httpd-1.3 product in Bugzilla for entering new bugs? Say the word and I'll click the clicky in the Bugzilla admin. +1 Cheers Jean-Frederic

Re: Arranging mod_proxy_balancer in trunk

On 04/13/2010 10:35 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: On Apr 13, 2010, at 4:29 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: On Apr 8, 2010, at 3:58 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: On 04/07/2010 03:40 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote: -Original Message- From: jean-frederic clere [mailto:jfcl...@gmail.com

Re: Arranging mod_proxy_balancer in trunk

On 04/14/2010 05:45 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: On Apr 14, 2010, at 3:38 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: On 04/13/2010 10:35 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: On Apr 13, 2010, at 4:29 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: On Apr 8, 2010, at 3:58 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: On 04/07/2010 03:40 PM, Plüm

Re: Arranging mod_proxy_balancer in trunk

On 04/14/2010 07:26 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: On Apr 14, 2010, at 1:10 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote: You should also likely pass a int * (or something) to handle the requirement to also know total_factor outside of that call... Of course, lbstatus is something that outside code shouldn't

Re: Arranging mod_proxy_balancer in trunk

On 04/07/2010 03:40 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote: -Original Message- From: jean-frederic clere [mailto:jfcl...@gmail.com] Sent: Mittwoch, 7. April 2010 15:32 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Arranging mod_proxy_balancer in trunk Hi, In mod_proxy_balancer after runtime

Arranging mod_proxy_balancer in trunk

Hi, In mod_proxy_balancer after runtime = find_session_route(*balancer, r, route, sticky, url); There is a logic that belongs to the LB implementation, my idea is to add a apr_status_t (*updatelbstatus)(proxy_balancer *balancer, proxy_worker *elected, server_rec *s); in the proxy_balancer_method

Re: Problem with ap_proxy_retry_worker

On 02/15/2010 05:30 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Race condition? Yep :-( Cheers Jean-Frederic

Re: Working on mod_spdy, looking for contributions and feedback

On 02/11/2010 07:52 PM, Bryan McQuade wrote: A small group of us have been working on mod_spdy, an open source filter module that provides support for the SPDY protocol in Apache. I note that C++ is used in the code that may be a problem for a future integration in httpd sources. Cheers

Problem with ap_proxy_retry_worker

Hi, While doing a load test and killing (-9) backend server it appears that ap_proxy_retry_worker() marks workers for retry and it shouldn't. I think it is because we have everywhere: +++ worker-s-status |= PROXY_WORKER_IN_ERROR; worker-s-error_time =

Re: better SSL defaults in 2.4

On 11/18/2009 03:54 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: enable session cache by default? +1 Cheers Jean-Frederic

Re: slotmem improving doall

On 09/30/2009 06:18 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: On Sep 29, 2009, at 5:23 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: Hi, I would like to change the doall / ap_slotmem_callback_fn_t logic. For the moment we can't stop the doall loop, but it could be interesting to do so (for example while search for a value

Re: mod_serf uses non-public API

On 10/01/2009 03:45 AM, Guenter Knauf wrote: Paul, Paul Querna schrieb: very likely, mod_serf in its current for should just be polished to replace mod_proxy_*, and all of the async stuff should be pushed towards the MPMs.. well the question is: do we want to export

Re: slotmem improving doall

On 10/01/2009 04:06 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: On Oct 1, 2009, at 3:44 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: On 09/30/2009 06:18 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: On Sep 29, 2009, at 5:23 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: Hi, I would like to change the doall / ap_slotmem_callback_fn_t logic. For the moment

slotmem improving doall

Hi, I would like to change the doall / ap_slotmem_callback_fn_t logic. For the moment we can't stop the doall loop, but it could be interesting to do so (for example while search for a value in the slotmems). My idea is to return APR_SUCCESS when done and APR_INCOMPLETE if we want to go on

Re: slotmem API notes

On 09/03/2009 04:30 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: On May 15, 2009, at 3:33 PM, Chris Darroch wrote: Joe Orton wrote: w.r.t. locking, my take for socache was: you either duplicate the code in every provider, or you duplicate the code in every API consumer, so it wasn't obvious what was best. I

Re: svn commit: r799334 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/cluster/mod_heartmonitor.c

On 08/03/2009 08:02 PM, Paul Querna wrote: On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 8:37 AM,jfcl...@apache.org wrote: Author: jfclere Date: Thu Jul 30 15:37:22 2009 New Revision: 799334 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=799334view=rev Log: Add the file logic for the handler. (Next step add the slotmem

--enable-maintainer-mode doesn't work with trunk

Hi, I have noted that --enable-maintainer-mode doesn't work with trunk, should I patch the configure.in? Cheers Jean-Frederic

Re: svn commit: r799334 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/cluster/mod_heartmonitor.c

On 07/30/2009 09:27 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 07/30/2009 05:37 PM, jfcl...@apache.org wrote: Author: jfclere Date: Thu Jul 30 15:37:22 2009 New Revision: 799334 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=799334view=rev Log: Add the file logic for the handler. (Next step add the slotmem logic

Re: svn commit: r791617 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules: cluster/mod_heartmonitor.c proxy/balancers/mod_lbmethod_heartbeat.c

On 07/07/2009 09:05 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 07/06/2009 11:14 PM, jfcl...@apache.org wrote: Author: jfclere Date: Mon Jul 6 21:14:21 2009 New Revision: 791617 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=791617view=rev Log: Add use slotmem. Directive HeartbeatMaxServers 10 to activate the

Moving set_worker_param to modules/proxy/proxy_util.c

Hi, Now with the changes that have been made in the mod_proxy logic it is possible to create workers dynamically in balancer modules (I need that for mod_cluster and I have been experimenting with modules/proxy/balancers/mod_lbmethod_heartbeat.c). set_worker_param is needed to create a

Re: Using slotmem in /mod_lbmethod_heartbeat/mod_heartmonitor

Paul Querna wrote: On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 5:35 AM, jean-frederic clerejfcl...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I plan to use slotmem (additionally to the actual file based logic) in the heartbeat logic. HeartbeatStorage mem:logs/hb.dat (slotmem and key/save uses logs/hb.dat). HeartbeatStorage logs/hb.dat

Using slotmem in /mod_lbmethod_heartbeat/mod_heartmonitor

Hi, I plan to use slotmem (additionally to the actual file based logic) in the heartbeat logic. HeartbeatStorage mem:logs/hb.dat (slotmem and key/save uses logs/hb.dat). HeartbeatStorage logs/hb.dat (existing logic). Of course the hearthbeat handler will use slotmem and issue en error at the

Re: incubator proposal for (what was once) Inktomi Traffic Server

Jeff Trawick wrote: On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Albert Lash albert.l...@gmail.com mailto:albert.l...@gmail.com wrote: +1 Speaking of code, I'd be very glad to see more C / C++ in the Apache projects. Java is fine but I think Apache went overboard with it a little.

Re: mod_proxy_balancer dynamic change properties

h iroshan wrote: Hi Rüdiger, thanks lot , I already followed the source code of the mod_cluster. Its uses another shared memory implementation called slotmem rather than using scoreboard. A slotmem code is already in httpd-trunk. Are you sure is it possible to change this scorebord

Re: incubator proposal for (what was once) Inktomi Traffic Server

Roy T. Fielding wrote: I think this is an interesting opportunity to compare different implementations and share code where desirable. I haven't seen anyone comment on the proposal yet. +1 More code, more fun :-) Cheers Jean-Frederic

Re: ap_slotmem

Jim Jagielski wrote: On May 14, 2009, at 2:49 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: Jim Jagielski wrote: On May 13, 2009, at 12:01 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote: Jim Jagielski wrote: On May 13, 2009, at 10:17 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: Jim Jagielski wrote: OK, I think having 2 more API

Re: svn commit: r774454 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: include/ap_slotmem.h modules/mem/mod_plainmem.c modules/mem/mod_sharedmem.c server/slotmem.c

Jim Jagielski wrote: On May 14, 2009, at 10:16 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: On May 14, 2009, at 2:33 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: Thanks. The idea of ap_slotmem_mem is to provide an address in the shared area that can be used for example like the proxy_worker_stat. Using get/put would

<    1   2   3   4   5   >