Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/modules/test mod_bucketeer.c

all buckets must be "readable". -- =========== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson

Re: [PATCH] 1.3: Cygwin specifics in http_main.c

y_cache.c: cygwin specific #define around >setpgrp() > >Please review and apply to cvs if suitable. Thanks in advance. > This looks safe to me... I'll give it a day or so for any vetos to pop up, but if they don't I'll committ --

Re: [PATCH] 1.3: Cygwin specific changes to the build process

amp;& [ ! -f "$src" ] >- else >-ext=".exe" >- fi >+if [ -f "$src.exe" ] && [ ! -f "$src." ]; then >+ ext=".exe" > fi > src="$src$ext" > dst="$dst$ext" Why the above change?? If [] i

Re: [PATCH] 1.3: Cygwin specific changes to the build process

At 10:53 AM +0200 6/2/02, Stipe Tolj wrote: >Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> At 11:12 AM +0200 5/31/02, Stipe Tolj wrote: >> >diff -ur apache-1.3/src/helpers/install.sh apache-1.3-cygwin/src/helpers/install.sh >> >--- apache-1.3/src/helpers/install.sh Tue Jun 12

1.3.25 release status

ning of June4. -- ======= Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson

Re: [PATCH] Apache 1.3 and OpenBSD

SHLIB="-shared \$(CFLAGS_SHLIB)" >>+if [ -z "`echo __ELF__ | $CC -E - | grep __ELF__`" ]; then >>+ LDFLAGS_SHLIB_EXPORT="-Wl,-E" > >+ fi The '-z' is not normally used in Configure but

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP profiling results under 2.0.37 Re: Performance of Apache

I say unbuffered, let's call the whole thing off... :) Seriously though, +1 -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson

Re: apr_time_t --> apr_time_usec_t

Roy T. Fielding wrote: > > I still think it is insane to multiply or divide every time we want to > use seconds. Not a showstopper, though. > Insane? Yep. But if we require

Re: problem with mod_cache

Thanks for the good detail... unfortunately, mod_cache isn't quite there yet. It's still a work-in-progress. -- ======= Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society

Re: cvs commit: apache-1.3/src/include httpd.h

| > | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | He's a very naughty boy!" - Life of Brian | > ------ -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson

Re: Reminder; test/ directories in roll release script

ng breaks. (Also extremely > > useful as a source of example code). > > I totally agree. That's why my heart wasn't broken that they were still > in there for 2.0.39. :) > +1 -- ======= Jim J

Re: [TEST PLEASE!!] apache 1.3 and 2.0 nearing release

://www.novell.com > cool. A few more results and we can release these puppies! -- ======= Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for

Re: [STATUS] apache 1.3 and 2.0 nearing release

in /dev/dist -- ======= Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson

Content-Length specifics

Is whitespace allowed after the value set in Content-Length? eg: Content-Length: 12344 \r\n ^^ -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A so

Re: [PATCH httpd 1.2] chunk size overflow

ith 1.2, or other non HTTP/1.1 proxies I think :) -- ======= Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order

Re: Content-Length specifics

mp;& *endptr) test). Not a problem, but a point to keep in mind. -- ======= Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson

Re: Content-Length specifics

Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Yes, it still works, though mostly it's because we '%ld' the value > in the table. ;) I was just walking through what could happen if, > in some way, the value in the table was something like "123 " or so. > That does not look pos

[PATCH] 2.0 - bad vs overflow

return HTTP_BAD_REQUEST; +} } } @@ -1738,6 +1757,7 @@ "%s with body is not allowed for %s", r->method, r->uri); return HTTP_REQUEST_ENTITY_TOO_LARGE; } + #ifdef AP_DEBUG { -- ==

[PATCH] 1.3 - bad vs overflow

else { +return HTTP_BAD_REQUEST; +} } } -- ======= Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson

Re: [PATCH] Apache2 httpd.conf

active by default, so I'm like -0.75 about this :) -- ======= Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson

Re: [PATCH] Apache2 httpd.conf

em active? That was my understanding. If not, then, well... (in my best Emily Latella voice)... "never mind" :) -- =========== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society

Re: Christopher Williamson: URGENT: Bug/compatability issue in Apache

ust a quick > 'we are looking into it' would help me rest easier. > > Christopher Williamson > President, DreamQuest Software (http://dq.com/) > "Championship Spades is the first cross-platform wireless game!" > > --- End of Forwarded Message > -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson

Re: Christopher Williamson: URGENT: Bug/compatability issue in Apache

FWIW: httpd-2.0 does not appear to perform this check... +0 for removing the check +1 for making it runtime either way :) Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Hrm I would be prone to either removing this patch, or at least > redoing it. As some of you may recall, I mentioned this area

Re: Christopher Williamson: URGENT: Bug/compatability issue in Apache 1.3.26

Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 10:55:43AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > We should at least match 1.3 and 2.0's behavior. 2.0, as of the latest > > CVS, still allows HTTP-1.1 (or whatever). > > Woo-hoo, guys. Threads and votes like this sho

Re: Christopher Williamson: URGENT: Bug/compatability issue in Apache 1.3.26 (fwd)

t; > list-post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] > From: Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Christopher Williamson: URGENT: Bug/compatability issue in Apache 1.3.26 > To: [EMAIL

Re: Christopher Williamson: URGENT: Bug/compatability issue in Apache 1.3.26 (fwd)

Forwarded message: > > On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 10:55:43AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > I agree that HTTP-1.1 is broken, but it is debatable whether we should > > provide some sort of backwards compatibility. My thoughts are a > > StrictProtocol directive that defaults

HTTP-1.0 votes WAS: RE: Christopher Williamson: URGENT: Bug/compatability issue in Apache 1.3.26 (fwd)

.0 > > Sander > -- =========== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson

Re: Christopher Williamson: URGENT: Bug/compatability issue in Apache 1.3.26 (fwd)

Forwarded message: > > +1 for the directive and default setting > > :) > > david > - Original Message - > From: "Jim Jagielski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2002 3:55 PM > Subject: Re:

[PATCH] Making the protocol check runtime

= 0; + while (ap_isspace(r->protocol[n])) + ++n; + if (r->protocol[n] != '\0') { + r->status= HTTP_BAD_REQUEST; + r->proto_num = HTTP_VERSION(1,0); + r->protocol = ap_pstrdup(r->pool, "HTTP/1.0"); +

ProtocolReqCheck directive patch

* after the protocol string. A protocol string of nothing but + * whitespace is considered valid */ +if (ap_protocol_req_check && !valid_protocol) { +int n = 0; + while (ap_isspace(r->protocol[n])) + ++n; + if (r->protocol[n] != '\0'

Re: 1.3.26: Content-Length header too strict now

hout producing errors. >Perhaps this can be made part of Apache 1.3.27? > > Please let me know what you all think of this idea. > > Dave > -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson

Re: cvs commit: apache-1.3/src/main http_protocol.c

-1,5 +1,13 @@ > >Changes with Apache 1.3.27 > > > > + *) In 1.3.26, a null or all blank Content-Length field would be > > + triggered as an error; previous versions would silently ignore > > + this and assume 0. As a special case, we now allow this an

Re: cvs commit: apache-1.3/src/main http_protocol.c

nt check of digits and we utilize that. Sure the code does a superfluous setting of r->remaining, but that gets optimized away anyway and it's clear :) *duck* -- ======= Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http

Re: Port 80 vs 8080 when not SU.

we can't start > apache listening on a privileged port (One above 1024)" > fi > Add to that the "Server will run..." message and the setting to port 8080 and +1 :) I'd prefer education but also that they get a configuration that they can test "right

Re: [PATCH] Patch to compile apache-1.3.20+ on LynxOS-3.0.1

es > FILES="`cd $src; \ >-find . -depth -print |\ >+find . -print |\ > sed -e '/\.o$/d' \ > -e '/\.a$/d' \ > -e '/\.so$/d' \ >diff -ruN ./src/include/ap_config.h >../apache_1.3.26-patched/src/incl

Re: Port 80 vs 8080 when not SU.

nd a possible expectation from the community) without more compelling reasons. -- ======= Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a littl

Re: Port 80 vs 8080 when not SU.

Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 03:12:07PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Have there been any complaints about how 1.3 has been doing it for > > ages? A 'make install; /bin/apachectl start' no matter who does > > the building has "

Re: Port 80 vs 8080 when not SU.

ured the FIRST time the > server is installed. > Which is the case with 1.3 as well, BTW. -- ======= Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a

Port in Makefile.in

We still seem to be pretending we have a Port directive in Apache 2.0. There's a superfluous -e 's#@@Port@@#$(PORT)#g' handling of the config files, if I'm reading Makefile.in right. -- =========== Jim Jagi

"blank" Content-Length with Apache 2.0?

o go ahead and simply use strtol and handle the error condition of a negative number when we check for errno (as we do with 1.3). This makes the normal condition more streamlined and slightly faster. -- ======= Jim Jagielski

Re: Port 80 vs 8080 when not SU.

Who woudda thunk that such a minor thing would cause such a big discussion :) I love open source collaboration. -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that

[PATCH] Streamline C-L check

} -if (*pos != '\0' || conversion_error) { +if (conversion_error) { ap_log_rerror(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_ERR, 0, r, "Invalid Content-Length"); return HTTP_BAD_REQUEST; -- ==

Re: [PATCH] Patch to compile apache-1.3.20+ on LynxOS-3.0.1

sed -e '/\.o$/d' \ > -e '/\.a$/d' \ > -e '/\.so$/d' \ Why the change? Does LynxOS-3.0.1 find not support -depth? -- ======= Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROT

Linux Format Awards - Apache wins best Server Software

2002) -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson

Re: [PATCH] We have sysvsem on OpenBSD

_SERIALIZED_ACCEPT > +#endif > Why the "#else" part? Does OpenBSD lack flock() or is it because of the new 'chroot' that your version does, but the .org doesn't. If the latter, I'd prefer allowing both with the official ASF code. -- ===

Re: [PATCH] Patch to compile apache-1.3.20+ on LynxOS-3.0.1

ll take a look. Thanks again for the patches and for using Apache! -- ======= Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson

Re: [PATCH] We have sysvsem on OpenBSD

es were passing right by each other. I see the other thread on the same topic :) -- ======= Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson

Re: [PATCH] We have sysvsem on OpenBSD

EPT > +#if defined(__OpenBSD__) > +#define HAVE_SYSVSEM_SERIALIZED_ACCEPT > +#define USE_SYSVSEM_SERIALIZED_ACCEPT > +#endif > #define SINGLE_LISTEN_UNSERIALIZED_ACCEPT > +1 -- =========== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROT

Re: atol

#x27;m +1 on looking into this.! -- ======= Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson

Vacation reminder

Just a reminder than I'm taking vacation until Aug 4th, and therefore have very limited 'Net access :) -- ======= Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society th

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 acinclude.m4

; > Roy > -- ======= Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson

RE: [PATCH] Workaround for bogobrowsers

etration at > > the moment and where the problem is most visible. >> -- =========== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a lit

RE: [PATCH] Workaround for bogobrowsers

By the by, do we have a canonical list of such env-vars currently is use? Last I checked, the doccos were somewhat dated and sparse. -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ &q

Re: [PATCH] Workaround for bogobrowsers

Joshua Slive wrote: > > Jim Jagielski wrote: > > By the by, do we have a canonical list of such env-vars currently is use? > > Last I checked, the doccos were somewhat dated and sparse. > > The canonical list is here: > http://httpd.apache.org/docs/env.html#speci

Re: perchild on FreeBSD 5?

interested in only the n-t-s functions (I would call the multiple functions with commit bit n-t-s) -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will tra

Re: perchild on FreeBSD 5?

since the time spent in that mutex is just a portion of the whole request transaction itself (which is what Brian was driving at). So we either use the libs that don't need to be locked, as you say, or use prefork. -- ========

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/docs/manual/developer thread_safety.html

o it. > VERY cool! -- =========== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson

Re: Thread-unsafe libraries in httpd-2.0

t the doc/pages that Rasmus started is an excellent 1st step. -- =========== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson

Re: What evil lurks beneath macros... (an AIX xlc optimizer bug)

have to worry about how/if the compiler/platform handles functions at all. -- =========== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a

"invalid characters" during overflow - ap_strtol and apr_strtoi64

to the base) and I'm leaning toward that understanding, just for compatibility. So the proposal: should ap_strtol and apr_strtoi64 be BSD compliant with the handling of endptr for over/underflows? This appears to be implied by ANSI as well. -- =======

Re: cvs commit: httpd-site/xdocs index.xml

MAIL PROTECTED] httpd.apache.org :) Actually, the formal title is Apache HTTPD Server Project (and PMC) -- =========== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trad

Re: CacheOn directive

> ask bjoern hansen, http://www.askbjoernhansen.com/ !try; do(); > -- =========== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson

Re: more on the charter (was: El-Kabong -- HTML Parser)

e APR world, mostly because it's focused towards the web server and web server functionality. Would it destroy APR to fold e-k into it... I don't think so. Is there a better place under the ASF than in APR? Maybe :) --

Re: more on the charter (was: El-Kabong -- HTML Parser)

thinking mostly along the lines that under the "web server project" there exists the HTTP specific entities, and a HTML parser would fall into there. But yeah, it could also fit in APR too. But it's not going to ruffle my feathers either way. :) -- ====

Re: more on the charter (was: El-Kabong -- HTML Parser)

interpretation of the present division. -- ======= Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson

Re: Going to 2.1? was Re: authentication rewrite

nal choice. Again, this is mostly with my "user community" hat on. -- ======= Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson

Re: El-Kabong -- HTML Parser

ff on a tangent (geez, what a surprise) but in general, I think this is *very* positive. Has Greg had a chance to review it yet? -- ======= Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A

Re: El-Kabong -- HTML Parser

PR, as a compliment to the XML routines. -- ======= Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson

Re: El-Kabong -- HTML Parser

;t decide if this is what you meant or not. > Yes, that is what I meant... side-by-side with the XML stuff under the APR project in apr-util. -- ======= Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com

Re: what's the hubbub? (was: Re: 2.0/2.1 split)

Ian Holsman wrote: > > what we need most is a stable tree for a couple of months not spliting > out to a 2.1 tree > ++1 -- ======= Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/

Re: what's the hubbub? (was: Re: 2.0/2.1 split)

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > > At 04:22 PM 8/30/2002, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >Ian Holsman wrote: > > > > > > what we need most is a stable tree for a couple of months not spliting > > > out to a 2.1 tree > > > >++1 > > So... for the next

perchild on Darwin, hmmm

... ;) -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson

Re: [VOTE] Location of aaa rewrite

more dangerous and painful. -- ======= Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson

[PATCH] proxy no workie with no-cache Bugz: 10128

= ap_pstrcat(r->pool, "HIT from ", ap_get_server_name(r), " (with revalidation)", NULL); return ap_proxy_cache_conditional(r, c, c->fp); -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://

ap_vformatter (Apache 1.3) patch reversal

-} return cc; } -- ======= Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson

Re: ap_vformatter (Apache 1.3) patch reversal

Jim Jagielski wrote: > > I think that the below needs to be taken out of ap_vformatter in 1.3.26... > IIRC, it was a back-port of a 2.0 specific bug, regarding apr_psprintf(). > This also gets rids of the bogusness of: "It's not possible to > distinguish between an o

Re: Is it time to split the APR/HTTPD releases ?

bundle apr in the httpd-tar ball, and > just document/check the minimum version required? > > --Ian > -- ======= Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society tha

Re: [PATCH] 1.3 NET_SIZE_T is socklen_t on OpenBSD

E_LISTEN_UNSERIALIZED_ACCEPT > can we assume that if __OpenBSD__ is defined, then OpenBSD will be as well in all cases? If so, then I'm +1 -- ======= Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/

perchild under Solaris 8

might be somewhat doable. -- ======= Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson

Re: El-Kabong -- HTML Parser

code donation? I believe Greg has done a review of said code. Accept: Do Not Accept: Abstain: -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little l

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/support htpasswd.c

I also would prefer that the pain involved be minimal as well... This would be painful for people (breaking current .htpasswd mojo). -- ======= Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ &

Re: perchild under Solaris 8

At 11:07 AM -0700 9/10/02, Aaron Bannert wrote: >On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 01:07:30PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> If '-D_XPG4_2 -D__EXTENSIONS__' are added to CPPFLAGS during the configure >> process, perchild will compile relatively cleanly under Solaris 8 and &

Re: perchild under Solaris 8

ll, it looks like it *can* :) That doesn't mean that it should... ;) -- ======= Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for

Jaguar autoconf bug

sing GNU configure may not compile (just about all of them). You may wish to edit this file to reflect the above changes" -- ======= Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A socie

Re: Jaguar autoconf bug

stalled the update a bit ago, and the autoconf bug wasn't fixed. At least, after I installed it, the bug was still present. -- ======= Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A so

Re: Jaguar autoconf bug

Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Unfortunately, it doesn't. I installed the update a bit ago, and the > autoconf bug wasn't fixed. At least, after I installed it, the bug was > still present. > Looking through the Archive.pax.gz file confirms that the aut

Re: perchild under Solaris 8

__"). > # "-D_XPG4_2" etc. may be defined internally in . > That's what you get for looking at header files and code and not manuals. -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] htt

Re: perchild under Solaris 8

__EXTENSIONS__"). Looks like we should be using the later, for Unix 95. Doesn't appear that we need Unix 98 -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson

Like to release 1.3.27 soon

affect how Apache itself works, but there are some "add ons" that expect this (broken) behavior. Feedback please. -- =========== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society

Re: Like to release 1.3.27 soon

Dale Ghent wrote: > > On Sat, 21 Sep 2002, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > | I'd like to release 1.3.27 soonish. I've just committed a change that > | changes a default behavior of Apache with SysV shared memory scoreboards > | (basically, the segment is no longer c

Re: graceful?

gt; Not me lately... What's the # ? -- ======= Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson

Re: graceful?

Cliff Woolley wrote: > > On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > Not me lately... What's the # ? > > Oy... um, the last one? ;-] > > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12033 > > Oh, and not to startle the 1.3.27 RM... I

[PATCH] Be more lenient with ap_proxy_read_headers in 2.0

89,7 @@ /* make sure we add so as not to destroy duplicated headers */ apr_table_add(headers_out, buffer, value); +saw_headers = 1; /* the header was too long; at the least we should skip extra data */ if (len >= size - 1) { --

Re: [PATCH] Be more lenient with ap_proxy_read_headers in 2.0

created and posted the patch. I agree that we cannot and should not fix or work-around everything that's broken out there, but the 1.3 argument sometimes is enough... -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PATCH] Alerting when fnctl is going bad

I'd prefer this wait until after 1.3.27 is released. -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order

Re: [PATCH] add simple ${ENV} substitution during config file read

After 1.3.27 please :) I want as little "new stuff" in between now and the release (hopefully *very* soon) to avoid problems and complications ;) -- ======= Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: mod_blanks

over Bourbon Street > tonight..." > > -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson

Re: PHP and Apache 1.3 issue ...

Ramesh Shankar wrote: > Threads? Is this under Win32? -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order

[PATCH] bogus header handling in ap_proxy_read_headers

"proxy: Ignoring duplicate HTTP header " +"proxy: Ignoring bogus HTTP header " "returned by %s (%s)", r->uri, r->method); continue; } @@ -475,6 +507,7 @@ /* make sure we add so as not t

Re: [PATCH] bogus header handling in ap_proxy_read_headers

general unease at the > number of new config directives we have been creating lately... > > Bill > -- ======= Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society t

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >