MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote:
Disclaimer : Not targetting any one individual
I don't think there is target here, i consider it more as an open
discussion.
I have a question to the people have lots of time to write such long mails
and responses - why can't you instead spend
Hi,
I understand many people still are with 1.3 and don't want to change because
it's stable.
But Coding modules with 1.3 is definitively not easy and require many time
core patch.
Apache 2.0 was design to give many really good features like threaded mpm,
filters etc...
When you look others web
You are right, apache 2.0 pre fork is apache 1.3 prefork...
But one nice feature of apache 2.0 is to provide other mpm more powerfull.
worker mpm is apache 1.3.
If you look all benchmark of web server, you will see that all are now
providing threaded architectures because it's more stable and
mod_cache is not caching / because of negotiate problem, if i remember
well.
We discuss many times to why not caching, and never find really a good
reason to not cache /.
Brian Akins wrote:
mod_cache never caches anything ending in / (ie, www.cnn.com/) but
will cache /index.html.
Is this on
Hi,
Here is a little patch, fixing the ldap cache using shared memory.
After the fix for plateform using SHM or not, it was a problem with
cache init, unable to get it's rmm address to alloc memory.
I modified the cache alloc for the two cases, with and without SHM, now
not using more
a basic alloc
functions.
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Matthieu Estrade wrote:
Here is a little patch, fixing the ldap cache using shared memory.
After the fix for plateform using SHM or not, it was a problem with
cache init, unable to get it's rmm address to alloc memory.
why is st-cache_rmm not filled
util_ald_alloc to receive now
util_ald_cache_t and no more apr_rmm_t.
As we are just before the cache alloc, it's impossible to give
util_ald_alloc a cache object, that's why there, i did a basic alloc
functions.
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Matthieu Estrade wrote:
Here is a little patch, fixing
Hi,
About ldap cache + shm: I tested all these patch on linux and it was
working well, seems it work well too on FreeBSD.
I heard problem on solaris (PR #18756) but i am not sure these bugs are
from ldap cache, but more from the changes done with ldap lib and TLS.
Considering the module is
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 16 Jul 2004, at 15:13, Graham Leggett wrote:
Brian Akins wrote:
If it works, I say commit the patch. Can think of no reason why we
should not cache an URL ending is /.
Because the cache_in filter gets added in the quick_handler. The
fast_internal_redirect in mod_dir
Hi,
I would like to make disable and enable work with regular expression.
Something like CacheDisableMatch and CacheEnableMatch or working with
location tags.
Does somebody have more preferences to one method ?
Matthieu
Colm MacCarthaigh a écrit :
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 05:04:21PM +0200, Matthieu Estrade wrote:
Hi,
I would like to make disable and enable work with regular expression.
Something like CacheDisableMatch and CacheEnableMatch or working with
location tags.
Does somebody have more preferences
Bart van der Schans a écrit :
Matthieu Estrade wrote:
Colm MacCarthaigh a écrit :
I agree on this point, but people using this directive choose to loose
time on this regexp check.
The problem i have is many people wants to enable cache on .gif and
.jpeg and .pdf, but they don't know
We are using this patch in production on many platform for one year now, and
we don't have problem.+1 for integration in trunk.MatthieuMarc Stern
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt; wrote: gt; gt; gt; gt;gt;gt;
gt; gt; I ported the patch to 2.2.4, including the doc. gt; These are
exactly the
Paul Querna wrote:
My intention is for this to be a wide open brainstorming thread.
I expect that we will be able to discuss several ideas in much more
detail at the Hackathon next week, but I really want to get all ideas
'on the table'.
I have a few things I would like to see, but I am
The reverse proxy read a brigade, then forward it to the client. It should not
buffer the response but forward block of data. Maybe it's because of deflate
or mod_security...
But this behaviour is not normal imho.
Matthieu
On Thursday 02 February 2006 16:13, CASTELLE Thomas wrote:
Hi there,
Brian Akins wrote:
Francois PESCE wrote:
I've discussed about a patch for mod_setenvif 2 years ago, and have
coded it at that time, it is successfully used on various host in
production since.
You need to handle content type specially by checking r-content_type.
For some reason, just doing
I think people rely on apache 1.3 stability and security. many people
consider httpd-2.0 as too young and don't try to understand why it's better.
Does somebody have some percentage about 1.3 use and 2.0 ?
I don't think 1.3 is still here because of modules, there is too many
modules and too
Brett Lentz (Excell Data Corporation) wrote:
Please don't forget:
1. Solaris 10 is shipping with 1.3.31
Redhat is shipping 2.0 for long time now
2. OpenBSD's fork of 1.3
openbsd and the theocracy ?? hahaha cool
let them continue with 1.3
--Brett.
Systems Administrator, RHCE
-Original
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Grab the 2.1.1 tarballs while they're fresh. Please start testing
these releases - they should have the intent of becoming the beginning
of the 2.2.x series modulo all of the cleanup work we'll have to do
after we branch. For now,
Hi,
Does somebody know old issues with Netscape 4.x and SSL keepalive ?
I actually have an httpd-2.0 reverse proxy, and an IIS backend.
Netscape connected directly on IIS is runnig well, keepalive is ok.
Netscape connected throught a netscape proxy is running well, keepalive
is ok.
Netscape
I'm close to finish the ocsp feature on mod_ssl, but when i look the
entire client auth system, there is some little point not really clean.
For example, when somebody today setup a SSLVerifyClient require and put
CA and CRL, with SSLCARevocationPath, if no CRL is correct inside the
path,
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Wednesday, February 23, 2005 5:55 PM +0200 Graham Leggett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As soon as you install httpd + APR in a system location, you no
longer can
install subversion + APR in a system location. This was the basis of
getting vendor packaging files (like
luca regini wrote:
Taking a look at mod_mem_cache source code i have seen that it doesn't
use pools to allocate cache objects but i does so by means of
reference counting and simple calloc/free calls. I have also seen
that this module requires a Threaded apr to work.
If you use prefork, each
Jem Berkes wrote:
To address one of the points brought up on IRC, if there is actually a
non-experimental target for this software any time soon it would make
more sense to support the 2.0 server as I think few production servers
would be running 2.1?
I am not sure all of this smtp stuff
I agree with you, but when i tried to do this in the module you can find in
www.apache.org/~mestrade/ , i found many dependencies in some *http* files.
request_rec is defined in httpd.h and i think it will not be clean to handle
some smtp data in a file with a name containing http, that's why i
Hi Rian,
I like how the code is done. I am not sure a hook for each smtp command
is the good solution. Adding a new command here is very simple and quick.
the problem i found when i did my poc is when there is in the command,
different destination email. It's difficult here to keep the
Hi,
This is my second and new patch for ldap cache using shared memory.
I am using ldap cache with linux redhat and worker mpm.
The problems i found:
1) All shm cache information (shm addr, rmm addr, lock) are declared as
global.
-- in worker mpm, many strange problems happen.
2) shm
comment on bugzilla), but
i haven't a solaris box to test and debug...
And i don't know if i will be able to reproduce the bug if i install a
sol9 x86.
Matthieu
Jeff Trawick a écrit:
Matthieu Estrade wrote:
This is my second and new patch for ldap cache using shared memory.
I am using ldap cache
Hi Jess,
Did you used the patch i did and i posted here and on bugzilla for bug
#18756 ?
For your first issue, the problem should be that all memory allocation
are not controlled in the code, i mean if it return NULL or an address
to the memory, it's the same.
So maybe when you are at user
Hi,
I am actually using apache as a reverse proxy, and i am trying to use a
handler with... and it doesn't work.
When i setup my SetHandler on a local virtualhost, it works well, but
when i setup it on a virtualhost doing reverse proxy, it's never called.
any ideas ?
Matthieu
I am using Apache 2.0 and what i want to do is a applicative
authentication using a form i wanted sent by the reverse proxy.
But i think i will do another way, looking into mod_mem_cache how it's
disable mod_proxy when it want to serve data directly from his cache...
Cliff Woolley wrote:
On
I have to look what this quick handler do exactly, but i work well and
seems to be able to act as normal handler.
ap_hook_quick_handler(cache_url_handler, NULL, NULL, APR_HOOK_FIRST);
Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Cliff Woolley wrote:
What exactly are you trying to do, and with
Hi Albert,
Could you try this little patch posted on bugzilla:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/showattachment.cgi?attach_id=8185
It works under linux but still not work with solaris... i never tested
it on FreeBSD.
You can also find information about the bug which is #18756.
Albert Chin
-
From: Matthieu Estrade [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 12:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mod_ldap SEGV while caching on FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE
Hi Albert,
Could you try this little patch posted on bugzilla:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/showattachment.cgi?attach_id
Hi,
I would like to speak a little about all this slow answer or review
problems.
i will take example of my last patch about ldap-cache.
I started doing it 5 month ago, and posted few patch many times on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nobody answered on the list, i posted about 4 or 5 times the same
Hi,
I'am trying to use the cache module with reverse proxy, and i have few
problems.
When i'am using a browser with data in cache, like the file test.gif.
If the picture is in my browser cache before my first try with the
reverse proxy,
mod_cache is unable to cache the data, because on the
Hi,
i'am working on mod_cache and mod_mem_cache + mod_proxy
i found a problem with EOS Bucket.
mod_cache is inserting his cache_in filter in output_filter when he
wants to insert data in the cache.
when mod_cache is used with mod_proxy, the cache_in filter is called
after mod_proxy call
brigade with a part of data.
Do you think it's better to modify how proxy is passing data to the
output_filter
or to modify the way mod_cache is getting his data from bucket_brigade ?
Matthieu
Matthieu Estrade wrote:
Hi,
i'am working on mod_cache and mod_mem_cache + mod_proxy
i found a problem
Hi again :)
I did a patch modifiying mod_proxy to pass the entire data (response
from backend server) to output_filter, unstead of brigade per brigade.
it seems to work well...
Matthieu
Matthieu Estrade wrote:
Hi again,
the problem seems to be in the proxy.
When proxy read the data
hi bill,
I agree with you about the proxy...
Do you think it's possible to force the cache filter, be runned after
all the proxy filters ?
Matthieu
Bill Stoddard wrote:
Hi again :)
I did a patch modifiying mod_proxy to pass the entire data (response
from backend server) to output_filter,
by the backend server.
regards,
Matthieu
Graham Leggett wrote:
Matthieu Estrade wrote:
I agree with you about the proxy...
Do you think it's possible to force the cache filter, be runned after
all the proxy filters ?
The cache filter is supposed to run after all the filters for maximum
caching
buffer a *huge* amount of
data.
The answer is that the cache code currently only caches responses
that arrive in one brigade. Proxy isn't the problem.
Matthieu Estrade wrote:
Hi graham,
the problem is the filter is called between two ap_pass_brigade by
the reverse proxy...
like:
proxy
Hi again,
Just to say when i put my mozilla/netscape in HTTP/1.0, i don't have the
bug i speak about in my last mail.
Matthieu
Hi,
I had this problem (proxying Exchange) few month ago, when apache 2.0
was just released...
I was unable with apache 1.3 to proxy my OWA (outlook web access).
When i sniffed the connection, i saw that for the login/pass process,
Exchange was sending a 401 until he found a valid
Hi,
I worked more on debug in mod_cache.
what i found is:
when the bug is happening, and it's not all the time:
the request are served from cache 1/2 times
so: first request is cached, the second one served from the cache, the
third one is cached.
find_entry function in cache_hash is unable
Hi,
I found a problem with mod_cache and mod_proxy...
when cache is storing the data + headers in memory, it doesn't care
about Transfert-Encoding...
So if reverse proxy receive a response by multiple brigade, with the
header Transfert-Encoding=chunked, mod_cache store it in mobj-header_out.
Graham Leggett wrote:
Matthieu Estrade wrote:
I found a problem with mod_cache and mod_proxy...
when cache is storing the data + headers in memory, it doesn't care
about Transfert-Encoding...
AFAIK proxy should always dechunck any chunked data it receives before
passing it up
Joe Orton wrote:
The session cache interface in mod_ssl on the trunk is now mostly SSL-
and mod_ssl-agnostic with respect to the data storage and configuration.
There is still some tight coupling between the session cache and the
ssl_mutex interface, but that's next on my hit list.
Is there
Hello,
I've found something strange in the mod_proxy (httpd 2.0.63) setup:
The following directive says:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/mod_proxy.html#proxyiobuffersize
The |ProxyIOBufferSize| directive adjusts the size of the internal
buffer, which is used as a scratchpad for the data
Takashi Sato wrote:
On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 12:13:14 +0100
Matthieu Estrade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I actually need this directive to work better with some stream data. Can
somebody confirm the modification must be done in the code and not in
the documentation ?
ProxyIOBufferSize
Hi,
How about coding a module looking how many bytes are read and if there
is too little chunk of data, close the connection.
Something like a MinDataReadSize. If the read() function read too little
data, close() the socket... Dunno if it's possible to hook directly in
connection hook to do
The problem could happen also if a CL is sent and not enough data is
posted. So i don't think control for complete headers will solve the
entire problem. I'm actually playing with dynamic timeout considering
time between request line and first header to adapt future timeout of
the socket, but it
I totally agree with you.
This first point the lack of tunning of httpd.conf, this kind of attack
crash default setup of httpd.conf but a well setup server is harder to
kill, specially if you have decreased timeout. With 5 seconds as timeout
and a good tuning, slowloris fail...
More granular
Woow =) Very nice and interesting thread =)
It's very hard to think how to design httpd 3.0 before knowing what is
the real aim of this new webserver. Many feedback here are from very
spoted problems.
I've started at the end of 1.3 and the beta release of 2.0, and i must
say that applicative
Hi,
When apache is used with mod_proxy as reverse proxy and not proxy, and when
there is a %00 in the url, the request is directly refused by the reverse proxy.
In the code, in ap_process_request_internal function (server/request.c):
/* Ignore embedded %2F's in path for proxy requests */
55 matches
Mail list logo
