...@apache.org] wrote on 2012年4月16日 21:06
Hi Bing,
you did hit the apr list - I think this should go to the httpd list instead ...
;-)
Am 16.04.2012 14:32, schrieb Bing Swen:
After building the httpd-2.4.2 x64 binaries with VS2010, I encountered a
runtime error in the module libhttpd.dll, which
[mailto:s...@sfritsch.de] wrote on 2012年4月18日 3:29
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012, Bing Swen wrote:
The problem reported below was only with the binaries of the Debug
configuration, but disappeared in the Release configuration. So here is my
temporay way out:
/* line no. 680: */
#ifndef _DEBUG
Hi Daniel,
The draft is already a great document and very useful for Httpd application
developers. And I think it could be more helpful if it provides some guidelines
for updating modules from 2.2.x to 2.4.x, or some way to use the new 2.4
features.
Regards,
Bing
-邮件原件-
发件人:
William A. Rowe Jr. [mailto:wr...@rowe-clan.net]， 2012年3月17日 9:32
Ok folks, here's what we know; on some platforms the blocking
behavior is not being honored and SSL is terminated due to the client's
failure
to provide enough bytes in time. In fact it is the fault of apr
William A. Rowe Jr. [mailto:wr...@rowe-clan.net] wrote on 2012年3月17日 16:15
On 3/17/2012 2:54 AM, Bing Swen wrote:
Just wondering how we can test it if we can not yet (re)build the Win32/64
binaries from the source files...
How are you not suceeding? The delta from 2.2 is rather nominal
Steffen [mailto:i...@apachelounge.com] wrote on 2012年3月8日 20:29
In the httpd 2.4.1 announcement: .There is not yet a Windows binary
distribution of
httpd 2.4, but this is expected to be remedied soon as various
dependencies graduate
from beta to GA.
How did you make these builds, particularly those Windows 64 bits Binaries? Can
we share the directives, or can your method be integrated into the official
release?
Bing
发件人: Steffen [mailto:i...@apachelounge.com]
发送时间: 2012年2月29日 21:13
收件人: dev@httpd.apache.org
主题: Re: Windows
Some Nginx people just made a performance test with Apache 2.4.1 at
http://blog.zhuzhaoyuan.com/category/c10k/
Were the Event_MPM configuration parameters somewhere close to optimal?
Regards,
Bing
Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com] wrote on 2012年2月24日 20:57
w00t!!!
On Feb 23, 2012, at
First time to catch up with a high performance edge web server with the lowest
memory footprint ??
Maybe such performance race is good for both sides...
Regards,
bswen
-邮件原件-
发件人: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com]
发送时间: 2012年2月24日 20:57
收件人: dev@httpd.apache.org
主题: Re: Apache
Hi, Bill,
There seems to be some minor script problems to build a Win-x64 version of
httpd 2.2.22. Here is a brief report for your confirmation.
File httpd-2.2.22/srclib/apr-iconv/build/modules.mk.win:
line 170:
$(API_SOURCE)\x64\Debug\libapriconv-1.lib
Hi, 馬目,
It seems you are interested in the work organization and significance of the
Apache server developers for conducting some study? I took a look at your
website at Tsuda College in Japan (information science institue), and found
that you are using the Apache HTTP server (version 2.2.3
All of those warnings were int conversions, should be easy to fix.
bswen
发件人: Steffen [mailto:i...@apachelounge.com]
发送时间: 2011年12月18日 3:30
收件人: dev@httpd.apache.org
主题: Win64 2.3.16 :: build warnings
Here the Win64 warnings attached.
Quite a lot, 442.
Btw. Windows 64
Great news. Genuine progress actually, especially in terms of memory usage and
grow rate.
Bing
-邮件原件-
发件人: William A. Rowe Jr. [mailto:wr...@rowe-clan.net]
发送时间: 2011年11月21日 13:01
收件人: dev@httpd.apache.org
主题: Re: 2.3.15 on Windows
On 11/20/2011 2:11 PM, Steffen wrote:
No issues so
Steffen [mailto:i...@apachelounge.com] wrote on 发送时间: 2011年9月16日 3:46
...
Acept filter issue means in common that 2.4.0 cannot be used on Windows.
Or would it better that 2.4.x only excludes Windows XP (32-bit) support, but
Windows Vista and the later can be well supported?
Also, official
Sorry that I have little idea of log4cxx, so I can not help you for that topic.
Bing
-Original Message-
From: Govinda Raju Narayan [mailto:gnara...@unidesk.com]
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 8:41 PM
To: Bing Swen
Subject: RE: Query
Appreciated, for quick response, Is there anyway I can
Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org wrote on 2009-2-9 17:25
Hi,
Vista (Server 2008) and up comes with new winsock WSAPoll API.
Now I did some experiments and it compiles the unix/pool.c
by simply changing poll( ... ) to WSAPoll(...)
There is also no limitation on pollset size (currently
select is
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote
.dsw+.dsp lets us provide everyone with a makefiles and Makefile.win that
works ***everywhere***. If you insist on a GUI, there is one extra step
for Visual Studio 2002 (.NET) - Visual Studio 2008 users. But would you
like that we provide you a Visual Studio
Jorge Schrauwen jorge.schrau...@gmail.com wrote on 2008年12月17日, 19:07
For the early httpd-2.2.x series it has compiled on Win64. Then again it's
very picky in which platform you use.
Win XP x64 + VS2005/8 works best. Vista x64 is has some problems with
platform SDK (not sure they are fix now).
Jorge Schrauwen wrote on 2008年12月18日 20:10
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Bing Swen bs...@pku.edu.cn wrote:
Jorge Schrauwen jorge.schrau...@gmail.com wrote on 2008年12月17日,
19:07
For the early httpd-2.2.x series it has compiled on Win64. Then again
it's
very picky in which platform you
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote
Bing Swen wrote:
There seems to be a bug in the project updating functions of VS2005/08:
embedded \ char's in the .rc files always made a fatal error to the
resource compiler (rc.exe), e.g.,
... LONG_NAME=Apache HTTP Server ...
If all the inner
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
bing swen wrote:
So is it a good idea to maintain two sets of project files
to cope with this problem: one for the old VS 5/6 .dsp files
(no more x64 support), and one for VS 2005/08 .vcproj
files (with direct x64 support)?
No, it's a horrid idea.
Sorry
Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote on 2008-12-14 23:24
On Dec 13, 2008, at 9:32 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
2. A number of non binding positive votes and positive feedback.
3. Binding votes:
0 -1
0 +0
8 +1 (Colm, Sander Temme, Brad, Jim, Bill, Lars, Jeff, Ruediger)
So the vote has
Jorge Schrauwen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 2008-11-3 16:26
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 8:10 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
The subject of not having an official binary package was brought up.
We couldn't think of a reason why not except no body wants or has the
time to do
Dan Poirier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 2008-11-3 21:13
William A. Rowe, Jr. said the following on 11/03/2008 07:32 AM:
Lets look to supporting [name your favorite IDE] as a bigger picture
item not specific to windows, and to transition away from .dsp for
the build/ide view support.
Re:
Marc Noirot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 2008-11-3 22:06
William A. Rowe, Jr. said the following on 11/03/2008 07:32 AM:
Lets look to supporting [name your favorite IDE] as a bigger picture
item not specific to windows, and to transition away from .dsp for
the build/ide view support.
What
Jorge Schrauwen wrote on 2008-10-30 17:03
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 5:37 AM, Bing Swen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Querna wrote on 2008-10-30 12:10
Bing Swen wrote:
Paul Querna wrote on 2008-10-28 15:12
Hope you've included 64-bit Windows in mind. Make x64
Jorge Schrauwen wrote on 2008-10-30 18:46
biggest problem atm is getting the apr dbd drivers for mysql and such.
(never got that to work)
Personally I'd love to see the httpd project release 64-bit binaries
themselves. But it's a lot of work for not much gain!*
* tests with the early 2.2
Paul Querna wrote on 2008-10-28 15:12
I've added the Simple MPM to trunk:
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/server/mpm/simple/
...
One of the major departures is that it doesn't use any of the functions
from os/unixd/, which I believe is a good long term decision, since I
would
Paul Querna wrote on 2008-10-30 12:10
Bing Swen wrote:
Paul Querna wrote on 2008-10-28 15:12
Hope you've included 64-bit Windows in mind. Make x64 Windows a
first-class citizen in httpd-2.4.x, please.
How is it not a first class citizen in 2.2.x?
Here are some reasons:
1. Currently Win
William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 2008-10-14 23:06
Tom Donovan wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I noticed a few little things building 2.2.10 with VC9 on Windows:
* the windows source .zip is missing most of apr-iconv - only the .mak
and .dep files are present.
With
Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 2008-9-21 4:21
Graham Leggett wrote:
I know there are likely huge problems with this, but I would like to see
how far
we can push the Event MPM, figure out what to do better, if there is
anything, and then really dive into the 3.0 development before
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote on 2008年8月22日 9:03:
Which brings me to the other half of [community], I'm proposing we hold
an Apache httpd {next} barcamp session for the community who are at
ApacheCon BarCamp on Tuesday to learn about what has changed, what might
change, and perhaps if we get enough
Jorge Schrauwen wrote on Sunday, September 14, 2008 7:47 PM
This is no true. The latest version I've been able to compile was 2.2.9
http://www.blackdot.be/?inc=apache/binaries
You are however correct that it's getting more cumbersome! Vista + VS
2005/2008 is a no go. I'm using a XP x64
supplied httpd build, either.
RedHat's, for example, is not for production websites, IMO.
So I wonder perhaps next time you guys may bother to take time to also run
Nginx on your platform and tell us how it performs against your httpd
build...
Bing
Bing Swen (孙斌)
School of EE CS, Peking
Akins, Brian wrote on Tuesday, September 02, 2008 11:31 PM:
sustain about 45k requests/sec on our build on a dual dual-core system
with
a network card that supports Linux NAPI (that made a huge difference).
Without much tuning 35k is pretty easy. (Note: this was very small files,
bcs it's so
Akins, Brian wrote on Wednesday, September 03, 2008 2:07 AM
I saw this comparison somewhere. It just does not seem to match what I
have
seen. Our little ole website has been known to take a few connections
from
slow clients, but we have not really seen this slow down. I'd like to see
more
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Which brings me to the other half of [community], I'm proposing we hold
an Apache httpd {next} barcamp session for the community who are at
ApacheCon BarCamp on Tuesday to learn about what has changed, what might
change, and perhaps if we get enough folks to express
37 matches
Mail list logo
