the smarts to figure out which virtual host the log is for, but that is
relatively easy and inexpensive.
Jeffrey Burgoyne
Chief Technology Architect
KCSI Keenuh Consulting Services Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 4 Oct 2005, Brian Akins wrote:
Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
Try pipe loggers with 60 or so
likely have a higher level of
expertise that would allow for a better understanding ofApache and better
tuning to provide maximum performance.
Jeffrey Burgoyne
Chief Technology Architect
KCSI Keenuh Consulting Services Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, Brian Akins wrote:
Justin
in the
marketplace. I always suspected adoption would be slow, especially from
the generic masses who use a stock out of the package installation. I've
seen nothing to convince me that will not be the case moving forward...
Jeffrey Burgoyne
Chief Technology Architect
KCSI Keenuh Consulting Services Inc
Jeffrey Burgoyne
Chief Technology Architect
KCSI Keenuh Consulting Services Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, Wayne S. Frazee wrote:
Paul A. Houle writes:
Correct me if I am wrong, but I have seen much that would purport the worker
MPM to deliever gains in terms of capacity
, so worker offers
no advantages. I'd say in a large enterprise system where RAM is expensive
with maybe 8 CPU's, then worker may make sense. For smaller scale out
installations, no need.
Jeffrey Burgoyne
Chief Technology Architect
KCSI Keenuh Consulting Services Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 28
to the conclusion that Apache is ideally suited to the scale
out vs scale up model, and in that instance prefork is probably even in
terms of performance and flexibility with worker.
Jeffrey Burgoyne
Chief Technology Architect
KCSI Keenuh Consulting Services Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, Justin
I want 70% of the traffic to the
V880. Least connections will get me close to that, but not all the way.
Jeffrey Burgoyne
Chief Technology Architect
KCSI Keenuh Consulting Services Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Stefan Hueneburg wrote:
Hallo,
Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
installation is nothing more than
a central HTTP hub for proxying to mutliple back end servers.
Jeffrey Burgoyne
Chief Technology Architect
KCSI Keenuh Consulting Services Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
I've been keen to do some digging for reasons why someone might need to
install httpd v1.3
downtime is not tolerated and has to be followed
up with a post mortem.
Jeffrey Burgoyne
Chief Technology Architect
KCSI Keenuh Consulting Services Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Joshua Slive wrote:
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Brad Nicholes wrote:
Maybe I am jumping in here out of turn
testing and
verification time as soon as I have my test blade center up.
Cheers, and thanks for the good work everyone.
Jeffrey Burgoyne
Chief Technology Architect
KCSI Keenuh Consulting Services Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Graham Leggett wrote:
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
What's
.
Jeffrey Burgoyne
Chief Technology Architect
KCSI Keenuh Consulting Services Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Graham Leggett wrote:
Jeffrey Burgoyne wrote:
The first one is this method as prescribed above does not seem to have a
failover mechanism, i.e. if connection to one server
Hi;
Due to some poor performance on a clients Apache server, I made some
changes over the winter for their specific issues. The client was very
pleased with the changes I had made and have asked me to release them back
into the Apache mainstream release.
I should note that the issues this
12 matches
Mail list logo
