There have been threads about failover/hotstandby being differently in mod_jk /
mod_proxy_balancer & mod_proxy_ajp:
Status=d was not working in the same way like in mod_jk (worker with status=d
are not used when the other worker of the balancer fails)
Ruediger's last words as far as I know (Feb
Ruediger Pluem wrote
>One further obstacle is that it seems to me that even with the patch it
does
>not do a failover if you do
>not already have a session. So some broader changes are actually
needed.
Are you sure that even with the patch a failover is done?
My observations are, having applied y
Hello,
I´d like to restart the thread
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/305214
Summary of that thread:
Ruediger Plum fixed mod_proxy_balancer so that the status=d became persistent.
(http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=374929&view=rev)
Having applied the fix / using the following co
