Re: RESULT: Passed - [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35
FYI, 2.4.35 version has been added to bz. CJ Le 21/09/2018 à 14:31, Daniel Ruggeri a écrit : Hi, all; I am delighted to share that the vote to release Apache httpd-2.4.35 has PASSED. The following votes were recorded: Binding +1: minfrin, icing, jorton, gsmith, steffenal, covener, jailletc36, ylavic, rjung, druggeri, wroewe Community +1: Noel Butler I'd like to add that, as an RM, I am VERY pleased that we received 12 votes in only 3.5 days. I thank you for all the time you've put into this project and into testing this release. ANNOUNCE text will be updated a bit later today (with a note about OpenSSL and upcoming TLS 1.3) and I've kicked off the dist sync process. I will also plan to RM a followup release as promised now that the TLS 1.3 change has been merged... but let's give that a few weeks for other features to make it into 2.4.x :-)
RESULT: Passed - [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35
Hi, all; I am delighted to share that the vote to release Apache httpd-2.4.35 has PASSED. The following votes were recorded: Binding +1: minfrin, icing, jorton, gsmith, steffenal, covener, jailletc36, ylavic, rjung, druggeri, wroewe Community +1: Noel Butler I'd like to add that, as an RM, I am VERY pleased that we received 12 votes in only 3.5 days. I thank you for all the time you've put into this project and into testing this release. ANNOUNCE text will be updated a bit later today (with a note about OpenSSL and upcoming TLS 1.3) and I've kicked off the dist sync process. I will also plan to RM a followup release as promised now that the TLS 1.3 change has been merged... but let's give that a few weeks for other features to make it into 2.4.x :-) -- Daniel Ruggeri On 9/17/2018 7:56 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > Hi, all; > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this > candidate tarball as 2.4.35: > [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! > [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. > [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. > > The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: > md5: 92ddccfbd43b533578499d1faaad17fe *httpd-2.4.35.tar.gz > sha1: b7996c2c1f7ff5bb217114fe5354a19a5207ab62 *httpd-2.4.35.tar.gz > sha256: 31c2c82c9cd34749cbb60d04619d9aa3fb0814ab22246ad588d2426dde90c72c > *httpd-2.4.35.tar.gz >
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35
Hi, Steffen; Good catch. That particular change didn't have a CHANGES entry, so it explains why it's missing. Luckily, there are no user-visible changes (other than the error message being correct), so I think we're good to move forward. Would love to see a test case added around this if you're so inclined :-) Thanks! -- Daniel Ruggeri On 9/21/2018 5:59 AM, Steffen wrote: > Maybe I overlook it: > > I miss in the change log: > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision=date=1840546 > > Looks it needs special windows test attention. > > Description: > > Merge r1801144, r1801148, r1801456 from trunk: > > mpm_winnt: Factor out a helper function to parse the type of an accept > filter and use an appropriate enum for it. > > This makes the code in winnt_accept() a bit easier to follow. As a minor > side effect, it also fixes a small bug where the "unrecognized > AcceptFilter > '%s'" log entry would always contain "none" instead of the actually > unrecognized kind of the accept filter. > > mpm_winnt: Fix typo in the logged message in winnt_get_connection(). > > mpm_winnt: Following up on r1801144, use the new accept_filter_e enum > values in a couple of missed places in winnt_accept(). > > Submitted by: kotkov > Reviewed by: jailletc36, jim (via inspection), wrowe > > > > On 18-09-18 02:56, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: >> Hi, all; >> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ >> >> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this >> candidate tarball as 2.4.35: >> [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! >> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. >> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. >> >> The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: >> md5: 92ddccfbd43b533578499d1faaad17fe *httpd-2.4.35.tar.gz >> sha1: b7996c2c1f7ff5bb217114fe5354a19a5207ab62 *httpd-2.4.35.tar.gz >> sha256: 31c2c82c9cd34749cbb60d04619d9aa3fb0814ab22246ad588d2426dde90c72c >> *httpd-2.4.35.tar.gz >> >
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35
Maybe I overlook it: I miss in the change log: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision=date=1840546 Looks it needs special windows test attention. Description: Merge r1801144, r1801148, r1801456 from trunk: mpm_winnt: Factor out a helper function to parse the type of an accept filter and use an appropriate enum for it. This makes the code in winnt_accept() a bit easier to follow. As a minor side effect, it also fixes a small bug where the "unrecognized AcceptFilter '%s'" log entry would always contain "none" instead of the actually unrecognized kind of the accept filter. mpm_winnt: Fix typo in the logged message in winnt_get_connection(). mpm_winnt: Following up on r1801144, use the new accept_filter_e enum values in a couple of missed places in winnt_accept(). Submitted by: kotkov Reviewed by: jailletc36, jim (via inspection), wrowe On 18-09-18 02:56, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Hi, all; Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.35: [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: md5: 92ddccfbd43b533578499d1faaad17fe *httpd-2.4.35.tar.gz sha1: b7996c2c1f7ff5bb217114fe5354a19a5207ab62 *httpd-2.4.35.tar.gz sha256: 31c2c82c9cd34749cbb60d04619d9aa3fb0814ab22246ad588d2426dde90c72c *httpd-2.4.35.tar.gz
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35
Am 21.09.2018 um 04:18 schrieb Dennis Clarke: +1 for release and thanks for RM. Not enough time right now for the usual detailed report, but so far looks good on Solaris 10 Sparc, SLES 11+12, RHEL 6+7. Thank you for getting to it before I did. I can ignore it now ;-) Not necessarily, your input typically is very valuable. There's so much possible variation in compilers, library versions, linking type, OS patches etc. etc. But if you are short on time: merging support for TLS 1.3 will likely be the next step for httpd 2.4 and intensive testing then will be much appreciated. Thanks and regards, Rainer
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35
+1 for release and thanks for RM. Not enough time right now for the usual detailed report, but so far looks good on Solaris 10 Sparc, SLES 11+12, RHEL 6+7. Thank you for getting to it before I did. I can ignore it now ;-) Dennis
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 7:57 PM Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > Hi, all; >Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this > candidate tarball as 2.4.35: > [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! > [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. > [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. > +1, liking what I've observed on Win32/CMake, Ubuntu-on-windows, and Fedora. Have not had a chance to complete all of my review owing to some really wonky new Windows strict case path behavior, but the vote time ends, is good enough!
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35
Am 18.09.2018 um 02:56 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri: Hi, all; Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.35: [X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: md5: 92ddccfbd43b533578499d1faaad17fe *httpd-2.4.35.tar.gz sha1: b7996c2c1f7ff5bb217114fe5354a19a5207ab62 *httpd-2.4.35.tar.gz sha256: 31c2c82c9cd34749cbb60d04619d9aa3fb0814ab22246ad588d2426dde90c72c *httpd-2.4.35.tar.gz +1 for release and thanks for RM. Not enough time right now for the usual detailed report, but so far looks good on Solaris 10 Sparc, SLES 11+12, RHEL 6+7. Regards, Rainer
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35
+1 with the following test suite: system: kernel: name: Linux release: 3.16.0-4-amd64 version: #1 SMP Debian 3.16.51-3 (2017-12-13) machine: x86_64 libraries: openssl: "1.1.0i" openldap: "2.4.46" apr: "1.6.5" apr-util: "1.6.1" iconv: "1.2.2" brotli: "1.0.6" nghttp2: "1.33.0" zlib: "1.2.11" pcre: "8.42" libxml2: "2.9.8" php: "5.6.38" lua: "5.3.5" curl: "7.61.1" On 2018-09-17 19:56, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Hi, all; Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.35: [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: md5: 92ddccfbd43b533578499d1faaad17fe *httpd-2.4.35.tar.gz sha1: b7996c2c1f7ff5bb217114fe5354a19a5207ab62 *httpd-2.4.35.tar.gz sha256: 31c2c82c9cd34749cbb60d04619d9aa3fb0814ab22246ad588d2426dde90c72c *httpd-2.4.35.tar.gz -- Daniel Ruggeri
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35
On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 19:56:52 -0500 Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > Hi, all; > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > Builds fine (once I'd found a keyserver that would talk to my gpg today), but the tests bombed on me. Unlikely to have time to dig into that before at least Friday, so no vote likely unless you leave it open all week or thereabouts. -- Nick Kew
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35
Wow - that's actually really cool! Thanks for sharing - would love to see a HOWTO. -- Daniel Ruggeri On 2018-09-19 14:59, Christophe JAILLET wrote: Le 18/09/2018 à 02:56, Daniel Ruggeri a écrit : Hi, all; Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.35: [X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: md5: 92ddccfbd43b533578499d1faaad17fe *httpd-2.4.35.tar.gz sha1: b7996c2c1f7ff5bb217114fe5354a19a5207ab62 *httpd-2.4.35.tar.gz sha256: 31c2c82c9cd34749cbb60d04619d9aa3fb0814ab22246ad588d2426dde90c72c *httpd-2.4.35.tar.gz +1 Ubuntu 18.04 gcc 8.1 I now build with gcc test-coverage options. Attached, the results on my machine after a t/TEST. I use a slightly modified version of the script I've updated for APR. (don't pay attention to all the APR related text in the attached file :)) This gives the picture of what need more love in the test-framework. I can share the corresponding .gcov files to see which lines are never executed while running the tests. This still need to be improved and I will post one day a How-To about it. Based on it, I'll try to add some new test-cases to improve the test coverage of the test-framework. (i.e. see my latest additions for modules that were completely untested (reflector.t; allowmethods.t) or some paths not tested (setenvif.t)) We'll never be able to test all possible combination, but the more lines are executed at least one, the better it is. Thx for RM CJ
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35
+1: It's not just good, it's good enough! Tested on Debian(s) 7/8/9/10, MPM event/worker/prefork, APR 1.6.5, OpenSSL 1.0.1 => 1.1.0. Thanks Daniel.
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35
Le 18/09/2018 à 02:56, Daniel Ruggeri a écrit : Hi, all; Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.35: [X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: md5: 92ddccfbd43b533578499d1faaad17fe *httpd-2.4.35.tar.gz sha1: b7996c2c1f7ff5bb217114fe5354a19a5207ab62 *httpd-2.4.35.tar.gz sha256: 31c2c82c9cd34749cbb60d04619d9aa3fb0814ab22246ad588d2426dde90c72c *httpd-2.4.35.tar.gz +1 Ubuntu 18.04 gcc 8.1 I now build with gcc test-coverage options. Attached, the results on my machine after a t/TEST. I use a slightly modified version of the script I've updated for APR. (don't pay attention to all the APR related text in the attached file :)) This gives the picture of what need more love in the test-framework. I can share the corresponding .gcov files to see which lines are never executed while running the tests. This still need to be improved and I will post one day a How-To about it. Based on it, I'll try to add some new test-cases to improve the test coverage of the test-framework. (i.e. see my latest additions for modules that were completely untested (reflector.t; allowmethods.t) or some paths not tested (setenvif.t)) We'll never be able to test all possible combination, but the more lines are executed at least one, the better it is. Thx for RM CJ Title: Test Coverage Get Involved CVS Mailing Lists Snapshots Build on Win32 Build on Unix Download! from a mirror Docs APR APR-util APR-iconv Guidelines Project Guidelines Contributing Version Numbers Miscellaneous License Projects using APR APR Test Coverage This should give us some idea of how well our tests actually stress our code. To generate this data, do the following: ./buildconf CFLAGS="-fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage ./configure make cd test make ./testall cd .. make gcov Note that this will only generate test coverage data for the testall script, but all tests should be moving to the unified framework, so this is correct. mod_access_compat 81.94% tested mod_allowmethods 89.36% tested mod_auth_basic 55.79% tested mod_auth_digest 54.15% tested mod_auth_form 52.02% tested mod_authn_anon 75.00% tested mod_authn_core 37.27% tested mod_authn_dbd 8.55% tested mod_authn_dbm 22.22% tested mod_authn_file 85.48% tested mod_authn_socache 16.38% tested mod_authnz_fcgi 3.72% tested mod_authz_core 64.05% tested mod_authz_dbd 6.47% tested mod_authz_dbm 13.13% tested mod_authz_groupfile 62.50% tested mod_authz_host 14.29% tested mod_authz_owner 7.14% tested mod_authz_user 33.33% tested mod_unixd 32.41% tested mod_isapi 0.00% tested cache_storage 36.46% tested cache_util 41.47% tested mod_cache_disk 65.26% tested mod_cache 41.65% tested mod_cache_socache 5.58% tested mod_file_cache 18.80% tested mod_socache_dbm 1.43% tested mod_socache_memcache 4.86% tested mod_socache_shmcb 1.05% tested mod_heartbeat 16.25% tested mod_heartmonitor 6.22% tested mod_macro 0.00% tested mod_watchdog 66.19% tested mod_dbd 12.60% tested dbm 22.44% tested lock 57.92% tested mod_dav_fs 66.67% tested repos 34.00% tested locks 0.00% tested mod_dav_lock 23.81% tested liveprop 89.58% tested mod_dav 22.22% tested props 44.19% tested providers 33.33% tested std_liveprop 43.75% tested util 41.75% tested util_lock 59.07% tested mod_bucketeer 87.10% tested mod_dumpio 21.33% tested mod_echo 89.87% tested mod_case_filter 86.49% tested mod_case_filter_in 83.72% tested mod_example_hooks 0.00% tested mod_example_ipc 0.00% tested mod_brotli 53.53% tested mod_buffer 7.56% tested mod_charset_lite 6.47% tested mod_data 3.80% tested mod_deflate 41.54% tested mod_ext_filter 59.66% tested mod_filter 50.73% tested mod_include 75.20% tested mod_proxy_html 7.25% tested mod_ratelimit 48.76% tested mod_reflector 86.11% tested mod_reqtimeout 63.44% tested mod_request 13.10% tested mod_sed 3.06% tested mod_substitute 80.13% tested mod_xml2enc 0.00% tested regexp 0.00% tested sed0 0.00% tested sed1 0.00% tested mod_asis 58.14% tested mod_autoindex 42.69% tested mod_cgid 74.51% tested mod_cgi 8.19% tested mod_info 83.73% tested mod_status 65.29% tested mod_suexec 65.71% tested h2_alt_svc 19.23% tested h2_bucket_beam 73.98% tested h2_bucket_eos 74.29%
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 8:57 PM Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > > Hi, all; >Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this > candidate tarball as 2.4.35: > [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! > [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. > [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. +1, AIX/xlc/ppc64 w/ openssl 1.1.1 (1.1.0 has issues on AIX) Not 100% but as good as can be expected on my aging perl+prereqs For posterity: Test Summary Report --- t/ab/base.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 5 Failed: 4) Failed tests: 1-4 t/modules/http2.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 24 Failed: 0) Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 52 tests but ran 24. t/ssl/proxy.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 172 Failed: 118) Failed tests: 1-59, 114-172 t/ssl/varlookup.t (Wstat: 9 Tests: 74 Failed: 0) Non-zero exit status: -1 Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 83 tests but ran 74. Files=123, Tests=8537, 3811 wallclock secs ( 2.60 usr 0.36 sys + 49.25 cusr 22.23 csys = 74.44 CPU) Result: FAIL Failed 4/123 test programs. 122/8537 subtests failed. [warning] server localhost:8529 shutdown
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35
On 09/19/2018 01:18 PM, Gregg Smith wrote: On 9/17/2018 5:56 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Hi, all; Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release ... Nothing seen working on Solaris x86 or SPARC yet and I have yet to really throw myself at it. Don't let it hold anything back. I hardly see it as a large percentage of the user space anyways. I'll look at it starting later today. Dennis Clarke
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35
All fine here on Windows. > Op 18 sep. 2018 om 02:56 heeft Daniel Ruggeri het > volgende geschreven: > > Hi, all; >Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this > candidate tarball as 2.4.35: > [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! > [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. > [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. > > The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: > md5: 92ddccfbd43b533578499d1faaad17fe *httpd-2.4.35.tar.gz > sha1: b7996c2c1f7ff5bb217114fe5354a19a5207ab62 *httpd-2.4.35.tar.gz > sha256: 31c2c82c9cd34749cbb60d04619d9aa3fb0814ab22246ad588d2426dde90c72c > *httpd-2.4.35.tar.gz > > -- > Daniel Ruggeri >
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35
On 9/17/2018 5:56 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Hi, all; Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.35: [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. +1 on Windows w/ apr/1.6.5, apu/1.6.1 vc11 32 & 64 bit w/ OpenSSL 1.0.2p vc14 32 & 64 bit w/ OpenSSL 1.0.2p & 1.1.0i Thanks for RMing Daniel
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 07:56:52PM -0500, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > Hi, all; > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this > candidate tarball as 2.4.35: > [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! > [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. > [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. +1 for release, passes tests on Fedora 28 (OpenSSL 1.1.0h), CHANGES looks good. Thanks for RMing, Daniel! Regards, Joe
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35
On 18/09/2018 10:56, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > Hi, all; > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ all good on slackware 13.0+ with apr 1.6.5 and apr-util 1.6.1 -- Kind Regards, Noel Butler This Email, including any attachments, may contain legally privileged information, therefore remains confidential and subject to copyright protected under international law. You may not disseminate, discuss, or reveal, any part, to anyone, without the authors express written authority to do so. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender then delete all copies of this message including attachments, immediately. Confidentiality, copyright, and legal privilege are not waived or lost by reason of the mistaken delivery of this message. Only PDF [1] and ODF [2] documents accepted, please do not send proprietary formatted documents Links: -- [1] http://www.adobe.com/ [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenDocument
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35
+1 h2 testsuite: - MacOS 10.13 - Ubuntu 16.04.5 LTS (i386) - Ubuntu 16.04.5 LTS (x86_64) md testsuite - MacOS 10.13 Looks good, thanks for RMing! -Stefan > Am 18.09.2018 um 02:56 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri : > > Hi, all; >Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this > candidate tarball as 2.4.35: > [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! > [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. > [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. > > The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: > md5: 92ddccfbd43b533578499d1faaad17fe *httpd-2.4.35.tar.gz > sha1: b7996c2c1f7ff5bb217114fe5354a19a5207ab62 *httpd-2.4.35.tar.gz > sha256: 31c2c82c9cd34749cbb60d04619d9aa3fb0814ab22246ad588d2426dde90c72c > *httpd-2.4.35.tar.gz > > -- > Daniel Ruggeri >
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35
Apologies, my mistake. Was going down the wrong rabbit hole and ended in a version 0.0.01 off. :-S Stefan > Am 19.09.2018 um 11:05 schrieb Daniel Gruno : > > On 09/19/2018 10:56 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote: >> -1, the tag is not from HEAD of 2.4.x. >> Specifically it seems to me it is missing: >> r1840757 | jim | 2018-09-12 22:38:02 +0200 (Mi, 12 Sep 2018) | 12 lines >> Merge r1840010 from trunk: >> ... >> Can someone confirm that the tag seems to miss changes at the time it was >> done? > > Cannot confirm, the merge is present in the 2.4.35 tag. > Where are you not seeing your changes? > > I checked > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/tags/2.4.35/modules/http2/h2_session.c?view=markup > and the changes are there.. > >> -Stefan >>> Am 18.09.2018 um 02:56 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri : >>> >>> Hi, all; >>>Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ >>> >>> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this >>> candidate tarball as 2.4.35: >>> [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! >>> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. >>> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. >>> >>> The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: >>> md5: 92ddccfbd43b533578499d1faaad17fe *httpd-2.4.35.tar.gz >>> sha1: b7996c2c1f7ff5bb217114fe5354a19a5207ab62 *httpd-2.4.35.tar.gz >>> sha256: 31c2c82c9cd34749cbb60d04619d9aa3fb0814ab22246ad588d2426dde90c72c >>> *httpd-2.4.35.tar.gz >>> >>> -- >>> Daniel Ruggeri >>> >
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35
On 09/19/2018 10:56 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote: -1, the tag is not from HEAD of 2.4.x. Specifically it seems to me it is missing: r1840757 | jim | 2018-09-12 22:38:02 +0200 (Mi, 12 Sep 2018) | 12 lines Merge r1840010 from trunk: ... Can someone confirm that the tag seems to miss changes at the time it was done? Cannot confirm, the merge is present in the 2.4.35 tag. Where are you not seeing your changes? I checked http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/tags/2.4.35/modules/http2/h2_session.c?view=markup and the changes are there.. -Stefan Am 18.09.2018 um 02:56 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri : Hi, all; Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.35: [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: md5: 92ddccfbd43b533578499d1faaad17fe *httpd-2.4.35.tar.gz sha1: b7996c2c1f7ff5bb217114fe5354a19a5207ab62 *httpd-2.4.35.tar.gz sha256: 31c2c82c9cd34749cbb60d04619d9aa3fb0814ab22246ad588d2426dde90c72c *httpd-2.4.35.tar.gz -- Daniel Ruggeri
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35
-1, the tag is not from HEAD of 2.4.x. Specifically it seems to me it is missing: r1840757 | jim | 2018-09-12 22:38:02 +0200 (Mi, 12 Sep 2018) | 12 lines Merge r1840010 from trunk: ... Can someone confirm that the tag seems to miss changes at the time it was done? -Stefan > Am 18.09.2018 um 02:56 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri : > > Hi, all; >Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this > candidate tarball as 2.4.35: > [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! > [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. > [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. > > The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: > md5: 92ddccfbd43b533578499d1faaad17fe *httpd-2.4.35.tar.gz > sha1: b7996c2c1f7ff5bb217114fe5354a19a5207ab62 *httpd-2.4.35.tar.gz > sha256: 31c2c82c9cd34749cbb60d04619d9aa3fb0814ab22246ad588d2426dde90c72c > *httpd-2.4.35.tar.gz > > -- > Daniel Ruggeri >
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35
On 18 Sep 2018, at 02:56, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: >Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this > candidate tarball as 2.4.35: > [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! > [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. > [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. +1 on MacOS High Sierra, FC23. Regards, Graham —
[VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35
Hi, all; Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.35: [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: md5: 92ddccfbd43b533578499d1faaad17fe *httpd-2.4.35.tar.gz sha1: b7996c2c1f7ff5bb217114fe5354a19a5207ab62 *httpd-2.4.35.tar.gz sha256: 31c2c82c9cd34749cbb60d04619d9aa3fb0814ab22246ad588d2426dde90c72c *httpd-2.4.35.tar.gz -- Daniel Ruggeri
