Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Rainer Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff Trawick schrieb:
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 05/20/2008 08:52 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Do we really need to require the space in the case that the
Jeff Trawick schrieb:
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 05/20/2008 08:52 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Do we really need to require the space in the case that the reason phrase is
empty?
No... Both sets of code should be changed to consider the space
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Rainer Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff Trawick schrieb:
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 05/20/2008 08:52 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Do we really need to require the space in the case that the reason phrase
is
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 05/20/2008 08:52 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Do we really need to require the space in the case that the reason phrase is
empty?
No... Both sets of code should be changed to consider the space
optional. We just need
Hi,
I did some research on BZ 44995 and BZ 45092 and stumbled into the
following observation:
It seems that httpd 2.0 and 2.2 require a non empty reason phrase in the
status line. RFC 2616 allows an empty reason phrase:
6.1 Status-Line
Status-Line = HTTP-Version SP Status-Code SP
Sorry: BZ 45092 - 45026
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 8:56 AM, Rainer Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I did some research on BZ 44995 and BZ 45092 and stumbled into the following
observation:
It seems that httpd 2.0 and 2.2 require a non empty reason phrase in the
status line. RFC 2616 allows an empty reason phrase:
Hi Jeff,
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 8:56 AM, Rainer Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I did some research on BZ 44995 and BZ 45092 and stumbled into the following
observation:
It seems that httpd 2.0 and 2.2 require a non empty reason phrase in the
status line. RFC 2616
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 8:56 AM, Rainer Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems that httpd 2.0 and 2.2 require a non empty reason phrase in the
status line. RFC 2616 allows an empty reason phrase:
6.1 Status-Line
Status-Line = HTTP-Version SP Status-Code SP Reason-Phrase CRLF
6.1.1
On 05/20/2008 08:52 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 8:56 AM, Rainer Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems that httpd 2.0 and 2.2 require a non empty reason phrase in the
status line. RFC 2616 allows an empty reason phrase:
6.1 Status-Line
Status-Line = HTTP-Version SP
Ruediger Pluem schrieb:
On 05/20/2008 08:52 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 8:56 AM, Rainer Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It seems that httpd 2.0 and 2.2 require a non empty reason phrase in the
status line. RFC 2616 allows an empty reason phrase:
6.1 Status-Line
11 matches
Mail list logo
