One last question about shared memory...
I have my configuration now being loaded successfully into a shared memory
segment.. now my problem is that someone could change the config so that the
resulting structure wouldn't fit in the shared memory segment. Is it
possible to in the child replace my
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 16:26 -0500, Jason Funk wrote:
One last question about shared memory...
I have my configuration now being loaded successfully into a shared memory
segment.. now my problem is that someone could change the config so that the
resulting structure wouldn't fit in the
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 23:26, Jason Funk jasonlf...@gmail.com wrote:
One last question about shared memory...
I have my configuration now being loaded successfully into a shared memory
segment.. now my problem is that someone could change the config so that the
resulting structure wouldn't
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 23:26, Jason Funk jasonlf...@gmail.com wrote:
One last question about shared memory...
I have my configuration now being loaded successfully into a shared memory
segment.. now my problem is that someone could change the config so that the
resulting structure wouldn't
Hello,
The module that I am writing has an external configuration file that it
parses and loads into configuration when the server loads. Before every
request it checks to see if the configuration file has been updated and if
it has it reloads the configuration. The configuration should be shared
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:39:48 -0500
Jason Funk jasonlf...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
The module that I am writing has an external configuration file that it
parses and loads into configuration when the server loads. Before every
request it checks to see if the configuration file has been
In the mod-sflow implementation I have one thread responsible for reading in
new configuration as it changes and writing it to a shared-memory area where
the worker-processes/threads can pick it up whenever it changes. I don't know
if that is the best way or not, but it's one data point for
I have moved my configuration over to shared memory (following
mod_shm_counter as an example) and it conceptually seems to be working. I am
storing a struct in the memory and members that share it's memory (such as
the last mod time of the configuration file) persist over multiple children.
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 22:46, Jason Funk jasonlf...@gmail.com wrote:
I have moved my configuration over to shared memory (following
mod_shm_counter as an example) and it conceptually seems to be working. I am
storing a struct in the memory and members that share it's memory (such as
the last
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 22:46, Jason Funk jasonlf...@gmail.com wrote:
I have moved my configuration over to shared memory (following
mod_shm_counter as an example) and it conceptually seems to be working. I am
storing a struct in the memory and members that share it's memory (such as
the last
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:10:12 -0400
Mike Meyer m...@mired.org wrote:
I assume that this is because a new process was spawned to
handle a new request and the updated memory didn't get carried over (even
though the pointer address didn't change...)
A new process may be spawned from time to
11 matches
Mail list logo
