Re: Proposed T&R for this Friday

2012-08-16 Thread Jim Jagielski 
The -deps tarball was hidden (one had to look around for it) so
I just added a note that sometimes we provide it as a convenience.
On Aug 15, 2012, at 4:52 AM, Rainer Jung  wrote:

> On 14.08.2012 23:17, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> With my Mom's hospitalization and stuff, this kinda slipped...
> 
> I hope she is doing better now.
> 
>> I propose this Friday: Aug 17th.
>> 
>> Any conflicts??
> 
> You might want to take a look at
> 
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=r1241953
> 
> Since for 2.4.2 there was a deps tarball (and for 2.4.3 there will be again?) 
> this might benefit from another rephrasing (plus sync with trunk where it was 
> never applied).
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Rainer
>

Re: Proposed T&R for this Friday

2012-08-15 Thread Rainer Jung 

On 14.08.2012 23:17, Jim Jagielski wrote:

With my Mom's hospitalization and stuff, this kinda slipped...


I hope she is doing better now.


I propose this Friday: Aug 17th.

Any conflicts??


You might want to take a look at

http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=r1241953

Since for 2.4.2 there was a deps tarball (and for 2.4.3 there will be 
again?) this might benefit from another rephrasing (plus sync with trunk 
where it was never applied).


Regards,

Rainer

Re: Proposed T&R for this Friday

2012-08-14 Thread Daniel Ruggeri 
On 8/14/2012 10:56 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> It's also been a bit over 6 mos since we released 2.2.22, and there are
> obviously some who can't yet upgrade waiting for binary modules.  So I'm
> proposing to T&R 2.2.23 at the same point this Friday.  It will close
> the one security issue that has been sitting around a while, and also
> gives me an excuse to bundle a more up to date openssl.

Along the same lines... Sorry to be a pain, but I'd *really* like to get
SSLProxyMachineCertificateChainFile (proposed in STATUS) added or at
least reviewed by then. I'm hoping someone has a few moments to spare
and could take a look?

FWIW, I use the patch with engine and non-engine implementations on
Linux, AIX and Solaris.

-- 
Daniel Ruggeri

Re: Proposed T&R for this Friday

2012-08-14 Thread William A. Rowe Jr. 
On 8/14/2012 4:17 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> With my Mom's hospitalization and stuff, this kinda slipped...

Sorry to hear, hope she is recovering :(

> I propose this Friday: Aug 17th.

+1 - I'll address anything wrong for mak/dep files. Jeff's brilliant
catch of that regression in core.c to the windows accept logic should
put that whole issue to bed, 2.4 is looking much improved.

It's also been a bit over 6 mos since we released 2.2.22, and there are
obviously some who can't yet upgrade waiting for binary modules.  So I'm
proposing to T&R 2.2.23 at the same point this Friday.  It will close
the one security issue that has been sitting around a while, and also
gives me an excuse to bundle a more up to date openssl.

It seems like any and all interest by dev@ in 2.0 has died out and we
should declare it dead.  2.2 is well over 5 yrs old now.

So I'd propose in the next 2.4 announce, we would mention the availability
of a refreshed legacy 2.2 release, as well as that httpd 2.0 is no longer
supported and will not be refreshed,  encouraging all users to move on to
2.4.  WDYT?

Re: Proposed T&R for this Friday

2012-08-14 Thread Jim Jagielski 
With my Mom's hospitalization and stuff, this kinda slipped...

I propose this Friday: Aug 17th.

Any conflicts??

On Aug 7, 2012, at 9:38 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:

> I'm proposing a T&R of 2.4.3 for this Friday (the 10th)... I'll
> be RMing.
>