Re: [Discuss] Rolling a 'final' 2.2.33 release

2017-06-25 Thread William A Rowe Jr
That would have been a good fix to include, but the release has been tagged. If it is voted down on some other defects and we roll 2.2.34, I would concur. But there is no defined single char header, and x- headers are always 3+ chars by definition. So I don't look at this one as a showstopper.

Re: [Discuss] Rolling a 'final' 2.2.33 release

2017-06-25 Thread Mark Blackman
> On 14 Jun 2017, at 22:12, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > > Thoughts/comments? Patches to hold for before we roll? If I don't hear > otherwise, and we stick to the simpler alternative, then I'd plan to roll > these candidates Thursday. Would it be an option to get a fix in

Re: [Discuss] Rolling a 'final' 2.2.33 release

2017-06-19 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 06/15/2017 04:49 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 10:18 AM, William A Rowe Jr > wrote: Thoughts/comments? Patches to hold for before we roll? If I don't hear otherwise, and we stick to the simpler alternative, then I'd plan to roll these

Re: [Discuss] Rolling a 'final' 2.2.33 release

2017-06-15 Thread Eric Covener
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 10:18 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >>> Thoughts/comments? Patches to hold for before we roll? If I don't hear >>> otherwise, and we stick to the simpler alternative, then I'd plan to roll >>> these candidates Thursday. One more w/ bundled deps sounds

Re: [Discuss] Rolling a 'final' 2.2.33 release

2017-06-15 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 2:47 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 11:12 PM, William A Rowe Jr > wrote: >> >> Thoughts/comments? Patches to hold for before we roll? If I don't hear >> otherwise, and we stick to the simpler alternative, then

Re: [Discuss] Rolling a 'final' 2.2.33 release

2017-06-15 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 11:12 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > The alternative I prefer is to roll with the final apr[-util] 1.5 releases > as the 2.2.32 tarball had, and include the same warning as given > in the 2.2 release announcement; +1 > > Thoughts/comments? Patches

Re: [Discuss] Rolling a 'final' 2.2.33 release

2017-06-14 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 4:12 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > >Please note that Apache Web Server Project will only provide maintenance >releases of the 2.2.x flavor through June of 2017, and will provide some >security patches beyond this date through at least

[Discuss] Rolling a 'final' 2.2.33 release

2017-06-14 Thread William A Rowe Jr
Per to our discussion last year, this EOL is here. That discussion resulted in the following Announcement statement; We consider the Apache HTTP Server 2.4 release to be the best version of Apache available, and encourage users of 2.2 and all prior versions to upgrade. This 2.2