Okay, some final things before I start flinging vote messages about:
- DOAP files will, for the time being, only be possible for Apache
committers putting their DOAP files into people.apache.org. This is due
to a very strict firewall policy by Infrastructure, to which I agree. I
will look into
On 25.01.13 5:24 , Daniel Gruno wrote:
- Authors that have created or updated a module within the last two
years will be notified that there is a new site, and encouraged to
submit their modules to this site.
I know, I don't have the right to vote, but I still would like to know, why
you don't
On 01/25/2013 11:39 PM, Helmut Tessarek wrote:
On 25.01.13 5:24 , Daniel Gruno wrote:
- Authors that have created or updated a module within the last two
years will be notified that there is a new site, and encouraged to
submit their modules to this site.
I know, I don't have the right to
On 01/25/2013 11:39 PM, Helmut Tessarek wrote:
On 25.01.13 5:24 , Daniel Gruno wrote:
- Authors that have created or updated a module within the last two
years will be notified that there is a new site, and encouraged to
submit their modules to this site.
I know, I don't have the right to
On 25 Jan 2013, at 22:55, Daniel Gruno wrote:
On 01/25/2013 11:39 PM, Helmut Tessarek wrote:
On 25.01.13 5:24 , Daniel Gruno wrote:
- Authors that have created or updated a module within the last two
years will be notified that there is a new site, and encouraged to
submit their modules to
On 25 Jan 2013, at 23:06, Nick Kew wrote:
Rather say, every vote counts, but not every vote is binding.
... insofar as 'binding' has meaning in this context (before someone
takes up that baton and replies at length).
--
Nick Kew
On 25.01.13 17:51 , Daniel Gruno wrote:
The old data is simply incompatible with the new system, and we have no
way of knowing which modules still exist except to to through them all
manually (mind you, this is a lot of records) and check. The new system
Thanks for the detailed explanation.
On 01/23/2013 06:04 PM, Yehuda Katz wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 4:04 AM, Daniel Gruno rum...@cord.dk
mailto:rum...@cord.dk wrote:
If you find a bug, post it to me or on the list, whichever you think is
appropriate.
OK. Bug I found seems to be fixed (since about 2300 EST).
When
On 22.01.13 17:29 , Daniel Gruno wrote:
works (it's actually nearly completed already, you can see it at
http://modules.humbedooh.com/ - do try it out), and as such, I'd like to
Looks nice.
2 comments though:
1) If you browse the modules and click on a tag, you can't reset it. You can
only
On 01/24/2013 08:11 PM, Helmut Tessarek wrote:
On 22.01.13 17:29 , Daniel Gruno wrote:
works (it's actually nearly completed already, you can see it at
http://modules.humbedooh.com/ - do try it out), and as such, I'd like to
Looks nice.
2 comments though:
1) If you browse the modules
On 24.01.13 14:18 , Daniel Gruno wrote:
Although you could just click on 'browse modules' again, I'll take your
suggestion into consideration :) Perhaps clicking the green tag button
should just reset to 'no tags'
Yes, I saw that you can do that. As long as there are only a few tags, I guess
On 01/24/2013 08:51 PM, Helmut Tessarek wrote:
On 24.01.13 14:18 , Daniel Gruno wrote:
Although you could just click on 'browse modules' again, I'll take your
suggestion into consideration :) Perhaps clicking the green tag button
should just reset to 'no tags'
Yes, I saw that you can do
On 24.01.13 14:58 , Daniel Gruno wrote:
so it's a trade-off between simplicity and complexity.
For me, the browse feature should just be a
fast way to see the most popular modules in each respective category,
not in any way a complex tool for searching, as the search feature does
that just
On 01/23/2013 05:07 AM, Yehuda Katz wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Daniel Gruno rum...@cord.dk
mailto:rum...@cord.dk wrote:
I implore you to try out the new site, both as a regular visitor and as
a (fake) module author, and see if this isn't a vast improvement of what
On Jan 22, 2013, at 5:29 PM, Daniel Gruno rum...@cord.dk wrote:
This will be done by lazy consensus; If I hear no complaints within the
next 72 hours, I will consider the subject agreed upon and start
upgrading the site to the new system. So, if you do have objections, I
suggest you let
Suggestion: http://modules.humbedooh.com/search.lua
Can you make a blank search entry default to wildcard glob?
How else to search for all 'logging' modules, for example, without
having to enter in something stupid like 'm' for a search
term...
On 01/23/2013 04:42 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Jan 22, 2013, at 5:29 PM, Daniel Gruno rum...@cord.dk wrote:
This will be done by lazy consensus; If I hear no complaints within the
next 72 hours, I will consider the subject agreed upon and start
upgrading the site to the new system. So, if
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 4:04 AM, Daniel Gruno rum...@cord.dk wrote:
If you find a bug, post it to me or on the list, whichever you think is
appropriate.
OK. Bug I found seems to be fixed (since about 2300 EST).
When I clicked on the link to modules.lua on projects.lua, there was some
error.
On 01/23/2013 06:04 PM, Yehuda Katz wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 4:04 AM, Daniel Gruno rum...@cord.dk
mailto:rum...@cord.dk wrote:
If you find a bug, post it to me or on the list, whichever you think is
appropriate.
OK. Bug I found seems to be fixed (since about 2300 EST).
When
On 01/21/2013 01:02 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
On 19 Jan 2013, at 23:26, Daniel Gruno wrote:
Hello dear dev@,
I'd like to propose that we rewrite and rethink modules.apache.org.
snip
As suggested by a fellow ASFer, I am going to play this a bit hard and
fast, as not a lot of people really
On 22 Jan 2013, at 22:29, Daniel Gruno wrote:
This will be done by lazy consensus; If I hear no complaints within the
next 72 hours, I will consider the subject agreed upon and start
upgrading the site to the new system.
I object!
Not to the proposal: I have yet to review your candidate
This will be done by lazy consensus; If I hear no complaints within the
next 72 hours, I will consider the subject agreed upon and start
upgrading the site to the new system. So, if you do have objections, I
suggest you let them be heard :) But please do try out the new system
before you make
-Original Message-
From: Eric Covener [mailto:cove...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 23 January 2013 9:25 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Discuss] Time to rewrite/rethink modules.apache.org?
This will be done by lazy consensus; If I hear no complaints within
the next 72
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Gavin McDonald ga...@16degrees.com.au wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Eric Covener [mailto:cove...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 23 January 2013 9:25 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Discuss] Time to rewrite/rethink modules.apache.org
to rewrite/rethink modules.apache.org?
This will be done by lazy consensus; If I hear no complaints within
the next 72 hours, I will consider the subject agreed upon and start
upgrading the site to the new system. So, if you do have objections, I
suggest you let them be heard :) But please do
-Original Message-
From: Eric Covener [mailto:cove...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 23 January 2013 10:31 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org; Gavin McDonald
Subject: Re: [Discuss] Time to rewrite/rethink modules.apache.org?
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Gavin McDonald
ga
On 20 Jan 2013, at 1:26 AM, Daniel Gruno rum...@cord.dk wrote:
So, to summarize:
- modules.apache.org needs a general overhaul and a more detailed,
dynamic approach to its way of handling/relaying information.
- I propose we rebuild it from scratch, possibly using mod_lua as the
driving
On 19 Jan 2013, at 23:26, Daniel Gruno wrote:
Hello dear dev@,
I'd like to propose that we rewrite and rethink modules.apache.org.
Aha, the perennial call of the new contributor :)
Seriously though, thanks for taking up this old chestnut.
Let me throw my usual suggestion in to the ring,
Hello dear dev@,
I'd like to propose that we rewrite and rethink modules.apache.org.
For those of you who detest long emails (henceforth known as the
TL;DRs), just scroll to the bottom for a quick summary.
While modules.a.o does provide a mediocre service to those looking for a
module, I'd like
29 matches
Mail list logo
