Re: [Fwd: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43329] New: - apr_proc_create behavior change]

2007-09-13 Thread Joe Orton
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 02:59:10PM -0500, William Rowe wrote: FYI - this bug appears to be the root of several modules no longer behaving as expected on Win32 platforms. It takes me back to a question I raised on apr quite a while ago, what does *unix* do with an unset

Re: [Fwd: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43329] New: - apr_proc_create behavior change]

2007-09-13 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Joe Orton wrote: On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 02:59:10PM -0500, William Rowe wrote: FYI - this bug appears to be the root of several modules no longer behaving as expected on Win32 platforms. It takes me back to a question I raised on apr quite a while ago, what does *unix* do with an unset

[Fwd: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43329] New: - apr_proc_create behavior change]

2007-09-07 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
FYI - this bug appears to be the root of several modules no longer behaving as expected on Win32 platforms. It takes me back to a question I raised on apr quite a while ago, what does *unix* do with an unset child_in/child_out/child_err procattr member? If it is unset, does the child inherit the