Michael Clark wrote:
* A stackable performance statistics vfs module implementation that
does timings on filesystem io calls.
BTW I did some timings on linux for the wrapped apr_stat unix socket
sendmsg/recvmsg ping/pong calls to the privsep process and a OS cached
stat was about 22
Michael Clark wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
How you stubbed out the file io seems fine for the lifetime of 2.2.x
and maybe 2.4.x, but in the long run, I believe we need to support
some kind of VFS layer, to make all IO pluggable. (open file,
directory listing, etc etc).
Directory listings in
Michael Clark wrote:
Hi Folks,
I posted a note about my privilege separation patches the other day
and received some good private help/feedback, and have now made the
patches a considerable amount more portable and they are using apr
much more extensively.
The patch is now fully modular and
Paul Querna wrote:
Michael Clark wrote:
Hi Folks,
I posted a note about my privilege separation patches the other day
and received some good private help/feedback, and have now made the
patches a considerable amount more portable and they are using apr
much more extensively.
The patch is now
FYI
Michael Clark wrote:
http://oss.metaparadigm.com/apache-privsep/2.3.0-dev/mod_privsep-2.3.0-0.2.patch
The module proper, implements the privsep privileged operation process
that listens on a unix socket for privileged operations and performs
them on behalf of the unprivileged apache
Hi Folks,
I posted a note about my privilege separation patches the other day
and received some good private help/feedback, and have now made the
patches a considerable amount more portable and they are using apr
much more extensively.
The patch is now fully modular and allows mod_privsep to be
Michael Clark wrote:
Hi Folks,
I posted a note about my privilege separation patches the other day
and received some good private help/feedback, and have now made the
patches a considerable amount more portable and they are using apr
much more extensively.
Cool stuff! I'll start reviewing
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Michael Clark wrote:
Hi Folks,
I posted a note about my privilege separation patches the other day
and received some good private help/feedback, and have now made the
patches a considerable amount more portable and they are using apr
much more extensively.
Cool
