On March 24, 2004 11:45 pm, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
APACHE 2.0 STATUS:
[snip]
TODO ISSUES REMAINING IN MOD_SSL:
[snip]
* the shmcb code should just align its memory segment rather than
jumping through all the safe memcpy and memset hoops
I've asked on more than one
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 10:41:23AM -0500, Geoff Thorpe wrote:
On March 24, 2004 11:45 pm, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
APACHE 2.0 STATUS:
[snip]
TODO ISSUES REMAINING IN MOD_SSL:
[snip]
* the shmcb code should just align its memory segment rather than
jumping through
On March 25, 2004 10:50 am, Joe Orton wrote:
I've asked on more than one occasion and had no response. Why is this
comment here? From who and where does it come? Could it please be
either (a) discussed, or (b) removed? It happens to make very little
sense, but I'd certainly be keen to hear
-
From: Geoff Thorpe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 8:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [STATUS] (httpd-2.0) Wed Mar 24 23:45:11 EST 2004
On March 25, 2004 10:50 am, Joe Orton wrote:
I've asked on more than one occasion and had no response.
Why is this
comment
On March 25, 2004 12:46 pm, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
Now that we're discussing about shmcb, I had another question - I see
the following in shmcb.c
608 /* Work on the basis that you need 10 bytes index for each
session 609 * (approx 150 bytes), which is to divide temp by
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2004/03/25 02:40:17 $]
Release:
2.0.50 : in development
2.0.49 : released March 19, 2004 as GA.
2.0.48 : released October 29, 2003 as GA.
2.0.47 : released July 09, 2003 as GA.
