Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58
> Am 25.10.2023 um 16:56 schrieb David Zuelke : > > FYI, the https://httpd.apache.org front page still lists 2.4.57 as the latest > version. Not in my browser. And it was so already on release day. Something in your infrastructure delivering you old content? > > - David > > > On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 5:09 PM Stefan Eissing via dev > wrote: > With 8 +1 votes and no counters, this seems a go. If nothing else comes up, > I'll do the release tomorrow noonish. > > Thanks all for the testing! > > Cheers, > Stefan > > > Am 16.10.2023 um 17:08 schrieb Stefan Eissing via dev > > : > > > > Hi all, > > > > after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again: > > > > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release > > this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as 2.4.58: > > [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! > > [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. > > [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. > > > > The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: > > sha256: 503a7da4a4a27fd496037998b17078dc9fe004db32c657c96cce8356b8aa2eb6 > > *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz > > sha512: > > 5c11faf0572035ef67b27775d975999411c689cb774553175299a9e99b63d3d7138b0c7f15048ec28038494d8513689f916202c2289d557947d8b190d46ca9f3 > > *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz > > > > The SVN candidate source is found at tags/2.4.58-rc3-candidate. > > > > Cheers, > > Stefan > >
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58
FYI, the https://httpd.apache.org front page still lists 2.4.57 as the latest version. - David On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 5:09 PM Stefan Eissing via dev wrote: > With 8 +1 votes and no counters, this seems a go. If nothing else comes > up, I'll do the release tomorrow noonish. > > Thanks all for the testing! > > Cheers, > Stefan > > > Am 16.10.2023 um 17:08 schrieb Stefan Eissing via dev < > dev@httpd.apache.org>: > > > > Hi all, > > > > after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again: > > > > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release > > this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as 2.4.58: > > [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! > > [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. > > [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. > > > > The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: > > sha256: 503a7da4a4a27fd496037998b17078dc9fe004db32c657c96cce8356b8aa2eb6 > *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz > > sha512: > 5c11faf0572035ef67b27775d975999411c689cb774553175299a9e99b63d3d7138b0c7f15048ec28038494d8513689f916202c2289d557947d8b190d46ca9f3 > *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz > > > > The SVN candidate source is found at tags/2.4.58-rc3-candidate. > > > > Cheers, > > Stefan > > >
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58
> Am 19.10.2023 um 13:27 schrieb Rainer Jung : > > Am 16.10.23 um 17:08 schrieb Stefan Eissing via dev: >> Hi all, >> after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again: >> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ >> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release >> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as 2.4.58: >> [X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! >> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. >> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. >> The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: >> sha256: 503a7da4a4a27fd496037998b17078dc9fe004db32c657c96cce8356b8aa2eb6 >> *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz >> sha512: >> 5c11faf0572035ef67b27775d975999411c689cb774553175299a9e99b63d3d7138b0c7f15048ec28038494d8513689f916202c2289d557947d8b190d46ca9f3 >> *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz >> The SVN candidate source is found at tags/2.4.58-rc3-candidate. >> Cheers, >> Stefan > > I know I am late, but for the sake of completeness my test results: I am happy nevertheless (and relieved that it went well)! Thanks for these awesome test coverage, Rainer. Cheers, Stefan > +1 to release and thanks a bunch for RM! > > The full range of unit tests is still running, but enough have completed for > a vote. > > - Sigs and hashes OK > - contents of tarballs identical > - contents of tag and tarballs identical > except for expected deltas > > Built on > > - SLES 11+12+15 (64 Bits) > - RHEL 6+7+8+9 (64 Bits) > > For all platforms built > > - with default (shared) and static modules > - with module set reallyall > - using --enable-load-all-modules > > - using libraries > - APR/APU >- bundled deps tarball >- 1.7.4/1.6.3 >- 1.6.5/1.6.3 >- 1.7.x(r1911757)/1.7.x(r1911757) with libxml2 >- 1.7.x(r1911757)/1.7.x(r1911757) with expat >- 1.6.x(r1908753)/1.6.x(r1911757) >- trunk(r1911757) with libxml2 >- trunk(r1911757) with expat > - OpenSSL 3.1.3, 3.0.11, 1.1.1w, >and for all except RHEL 9 >also 1.1.1, 1.0.2u, 1.0.2 > - expat 2.5.0 > - pcre 10.42 > - lua 5.4.6 (compiled with LUA_COMPAT_MODULE) > - libxml2 2.11.5 > - libnghttp2 1.57.0 > - brotli 1.1.0 > - curl 8.4.0 > - jansson 2.14 > - libldap 2.6.6 (2.5.7 with OpenSSL 1.1.1, > 2.4.59 with OpenSSL 1.0.2*) > > - in total 200 builds per platform (80 for RHEL 9) > > - Tool chain: >- platform gcc >- CFLAGS: -O2 -g -Wall -fno-strict-aliasing > > All builds succeeded. > > - compiler warnings: > > - deprecation warnings when building against OpenSSL 3.1.3, see other thread > > Tested for > > - SLES 11+12+15 > - RHEL 6+7+8+9 > - MPMs prefork, worker, event > - log level trace8 > - Perl client bundle build against OpenSSL 3.1.0beta1-1, > 3.0.0, 1.1.1g plus patches, 1.1.0l, 1.0.2u and 1.1.0l-1 > (RHEL 9 3.1.2-1, 3.0.10-1, 1.1.1w-1) > > Every OpenSSL version in the client tested with every OpenSSL version in the > server. 18 unit test runs (3 MPMS x 6 OpenSSL clients) per server build. > > About 2.400 unit test runs are done, most with server OpenSSL 3.1 and 3.0, > for RHEL 9 also 1.1.1. > > Some local adjustments to tests were used: > > - t/modules/buffer.t: removing huge buffer tests > -my $bigsize = 10; > +my $bigsize = 5; > > The following test failures were seen: > > a t/modules/buffer.t line 37 > Not a regression > Only on RHEL 6, SLES 11. > > c t/modules/sed.t line 37 test 3 > Not a regression > Only on RHEL 6, SLES 11. > > > Regards, > > Rainer
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58
Am 16.10.23 um 17:08 schrieb Stefan Eissing via dev: Hi all, after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again: Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as 2.4.58: [X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: sha256: 503a7da4a4a27fd496037998b17078dc9fe004db32c657c96cce8356b8aa2eb6 *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz sha512: 5c11faf0572035ef67b27775d975999411c689cb774553175299a9e99b63d3d7138b0c7f15048ec28038494d8513689f916202c2289d557947d8b190d46ca9f3 *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz The SVN candidate source is found at tags/2.4.58-rc3-candidate. Cheers, Stefan I know I am late, but for the sake of completeness my test results: +1 to release and thanks a bunch for RM! The full range of unit tests is still running, but enough have completed for a vote. - Sigs and hashes OK - contents of tarballs identical - contents of tag and tarballs identical except for expected deltas Built on - SLES 11+12+15 (64 Bits) - RHEL 6+7+8+9 (64 Bits) For all platforms built - with default (shared) and static modules - with module set reallyall - using --enable-load-all-modules - using libraries - APR/APU - bundled deps tarball - 1.7.4/1.6.3 - 1.6.5/1.6.3 - 1.7.x(r1911757)/1.7.x(r1911757) with libxml2 - 1.7.x(r1911757)/1.7.x(r1911757) with expat - 1.6.x(r1908753)/1.6.x(r1911757) - trunk(r1911757) with libxml2 - trunk(r1911757) with expat - OpenSSL 3.1.3, 3.0.11, 1.1.1w, and for all except RHEL 9 also 1.1.1, 1.0.2u, 1.0.2 - expat 2.5.0 - pcre 10.42 - lua 5.4.6 (compiled with LUA_COMPAT_MODULE) - libxml2 2.11.5 - libnghttp2 1.57.0 - brotli 1.1.0 - curl 8.4.0 - jansson 2.14 - libldap 2.6.6 (2.5.7 with OpenSSL 1.1.1, 2.4.59 with OpenSSL 1.0.2*) - in total 200 builds per platform (80 for RHEL 9) - Tool chain: - platform gcc - CFLAGS: -O2 -g -Wall -fno-strict-aliasing All builds succeeded. - compiler warnings: - deprecation warnings when building against OpenSSL 3.1.3, see other thread Tested for - SLES 11+12+15 - RHEL 6+7+8+9 - MPMs prefork, worker, event - log level trace8 - Perl client bundle build against OpenSSL 3.1.0beta1-1, 3.0.0, 1.1.1g plus patches, 1.1.0l, 1.0.2u and 1.1.0l-1 (RHEL 9 3.1.2-1, 3.0.10-1, 1.1.1w-1) Every OpenSSL version in the client tested with every OpenSSL version in the server. 18 unit test runs (3 MPMS x 6 OpenSSL clients) per server build. About 2.400 unit test runs are done, most with server OpenSSL 3.1 and 3.0, for RHEL 9 also 1.1.1. Some local adjustments to tests were used: - t/modules/buffer.t: removing huge buffer tests -my $bigsize = 10; +my $bigsize = 5; The following test failures were seen: a t/modules/buffer.t line 37 Not a regression Only on RHEL 6, SLES 11. c t/modules/sed.t line 37 test 3 Not a regression Only on RHEL 6, SLES 11. Regards, Rainer
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58
On 10/17/23 20:58, Yann Ylavic wrote: On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 5:10 PM Stefan Eissing via dev wrote: I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as 2.4.58: [X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! Tested on Debian 12 and 13. Thanks for RMing Stefan! I don't want to be picky here but when folks report the goodness of a build on a given Linux or UNIX can we also please include the architecture? I personally run stuff all the time on Itanium and the IBM POWER9 and IBM POWER7 big-endian as well as some weird stuff like the SiFive RISC-V and yes ... even some old SPARCv9 stuff. I would love to be the geek running a web site on PA-RISC but that is really just being obscure on purpose :) -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Linux spoken
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58
With 8 +1 votes and no counters, this seems a go. If nothing else comes up, I'll do the release tomorrow noonish. Thanks all for the testing! Cheers, Stefan > Am 16.10.2023 um 17:08 schrieb Stefan Eissing via dev : > > Hi all, > > after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again: > > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release > this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as 2.4.58: > [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! > [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. > [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. > > The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: > sha256: 503a7da4a4a27fd496037998b17078dc9fe004db32c657c96cce8356b8aa2eb6 > *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz > sha512: > 5c11faf0572035ef67b27775d975999411c689cb774553175299a9e99b63d3d7138b0c7f15048ec28038494d8513689f916202c2289d557947d8b190d46ca9f3 > *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz > > The SVN candidate source is found at tags/2.4.58-rc3-candidate. > > Cheers, > Stefan
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 5:10 PM Stefan Eissing via dev wrote: > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release > this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as 2.4.58: [X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! Tested on Debian 12 and 13. Thanks for RMing Stefan!
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58
> Am 17.10.2023 um 20:37 schrieb SteffenAL : > > Found it. > > My error, had included h2_ws.h as extra library (sorry!). > > Vote now is +1 Thanks, Steffen. Good that you found the mistake. > > Steffen > >> --- Original message --- >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58 >> From: Steffen >> To: >> Date: Tuesday, 17/10/2023 18:29 >> >> For me still -1. >> >>> Op 17 okt 2023 om 18:18 heeft Stefan Eissing via dev >>> het volgende geschreven: >>> >>> Just got a reply from a contact that build rc3 on win64 and ran it >>> successfully. I invited him to participate here, not sure if he will feel >>> like it. >>> >>> I count that as a +1 on win64 unless someone objects. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Stefan >>> >>> >>>> Am 17.10.2023 um 12:05 schrieb Stefan Eissing via dev >>>> : >>>> >>>> I am trying to contact another person that builds regularly mod_h2 on >>>> Windows. >>>> >>>>>> Am 17.10.2023 um 11:30 schrieb Steffen : >>>>> >>>>> Same error on win64. >>>>> Yes the reported mod_http2 errors on 32 and 64. >>>>> Yes, I am not able to tell what is wrong, only I can report the errors. I >>>>> am not a developer, just building and testing. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, Steffen >>>>> >>>>>> Op 17 okt 2023 om 11:08 heeft Stefan Eissing via dev >>>>>> het volgende geschreven: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Am 17.10.2023 um 08:41 schrieb Steffen : >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -1 does not build on windows. >>>>>> >>>>>> If I understood your reports from yesterday correctly, the situation is >>>>>> - you can build on win64 >>>>>> - you get compiler errors on your win32 build >>>>>> - you are not able to tell us what is wrong >>>>>> >>>>>> Correct? >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Stefan >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Steffen >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Op 16 okt 2023 om 17:10 heeft Stefan Eissing via dev >>>>>>>>> het volgende geschreven: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release >>>>>>>> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as 2.4.58: >>>>>>>> [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! >>>>>>>> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. >>>>>>>> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: >>>>>>>> sha256: >>>>>>>> 503a7da4a4a27fd496037998b17078dc9fe004db32c657c96cce8356b8aa2eb6 >>>>>>>> *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz >>>>>>>> sha512: >>>>>>>> 5c11faf0572035ef67b27775d975999411c689cb774553175299a9e99b63d3d7138b0c7f15048ec28038494d8513689f916202c2289d557947d8b190d46ca9f3 >>>>>>>> *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The SVN candidate source is found at tags/2.4.58-rc3-candidate. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>> Stefan >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> > > <1pixel.gif>
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58
Found it. My error, had included h2_ws.h as extra library (sorry!). Vote now is +1 Steffen --- Original message --- Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58 From: Steffen To: Date: Tuesday, 17/10/2023 18:29 For me still -1. Op 17 okt 2023 om 18:18 heeft Stefan Eissing via dev het volgende geschreven: Just got a reply from a contact that build rc3 on win64 and ran it successfully. I invited him to participate here, not sure if he will feel like it. I count that as a +1 on win64 unless someone objects. Cheers, Stefan Am 17.10.2023 um 12:05 schrieb Stefan Eissing via dev : I am trying to contact another person that builds regularly mod_h2 on Windows. Am 17.10.2023 um 11:30 schrieb Steffen : Same error on win64. Yes the reported mod_http2 errors on 32 and 64. Yes, I am not able to tell what is wrong, only I can report the errors. I am not a developer, just building and testing. Regards, Steffen Op 17 okt 2023 om 11:08 heeft Stefan Eissing via dev het volgende geschreven: Am 17.10.2023 um 08:41 schrieb Steffen : -1 does not build on windows. If I understood your reports from yesterday correctly, the situation is - you can build on win64 - you get compiler errors on your win32 build - you are not able to tell us what is wrong Correct? Cheers, Stefan Steffen Op 16 okt 2023 om 17:10 heeft Stefan Eissing via dev het volgende geschreven: Hi all, after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again: Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as 2.4.58: [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: sha256: 503a7da4a4a27fd496037998b17078dc9fe004db32c657c96cce8356b8aa2eb6 *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz sha512: 5c11faf0572035ef67b27775d975999411c689cb774553175299a9e99b63d3d7138b0c7f15048ec28038494d8513689f916202c2289d557947d8b190d46ca9f3 *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz The SVN candidate source is found at tags/2.4.58-rc3-candidate. Cheers, Stefan
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58
Steve Hay was a great resource once upon a time ago, but meh, you can't draw blood from a stone forever. On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 12:32 PM Steffen wrote: > For me still -1. > > > Op 17 okt 2023 om 18:18 heeft Stefan Eissing via dev < > dev@httpd.apache.org> het volgende geschreven: > > > > Just got a reply from a contact that build rc3 on win64 and ran it > successfully. I invited him to participate here, not sure if he will feel > like it. > > > > I count that as a +1 on win64 unless someone objects. > > > > Cheers, > > Stefan > > > > > >> Am 17.10.2023 um 12:05 schrieb Stefan Eissing via dev < > dev@httpd.apache.org>: > >> > >> I am trying to contact another person that builds regularly mod_h2 on > Windows. > >> > Am 17.10.2023 um 11:30 schrieb Steffen : > >>> > >>> Same error on win64. > >>> Yes the reported mod_http2 errors on 32 and 64. > >>> Yes, I am not able to tell what is wrong, only I can report the > errors. I am not a developer, just building and testing. > >>> > >>> Regards, Steffen > >>> > Op 17 okt 2023 om 11:08 heeft Stefan Eissing via dev < > dev@httpd.apache.org> het volgende geschreven: > > > > > Am 17.10.2023 um 08:41 schrieb Steffen : > > > > -1 does not build on windows. > > If I understood your reports from yesterday correctly, the situation > is > - you can build on win64 > - you get compiler errors on your win32 build > - you are not able to tell us what is wrong > > Correct? > > Cheers, > Stefan > > > > > Steffen > > > >>> Op 16 okt 2023 om 17:10 heeft Stefan Eissing via dev < > dev@httpd.apache.org> het volgende geschreven: > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again: > >> > >> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > >> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > >> > >> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release > >> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as 2.4.58: > >> [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! > >> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. > >> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. > >> > >> The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: > >> sha256: > 503a7da4a4a27fd496037998b17078dc9fe004db32c657c96cce8356b8aa2eb6 > *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz > >> sha512: > 5c11faf0572035ef67b27775d975999411c689cb774553175299a9e99b63d3d7138b0c7f15048ec28038494d8513689f916202c2289d557947d8b190d46ca9f3 > *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz > >> > >> The SVN candidate source is found at tags/2.4.58-rc3-candidate. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Stefan > > > > >>> > >> > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58
For me still -1. > Op 17 okt 2023 om 18:18 heeft Stefan Eissing via dev > het volgende geschreven: > > Just got a reply from a contact that build rc3 on win64 and ran it > successfully. I invited him to participate here, not sure if he will feel > like it. > > I count that as a +1 on win64 unless someone objects. > > Cheers, > Stefan > > >> Am 17.10.2023 um 12:05 schrieb Stefan Eissing via dev : >> >> I am trying to contact another person that builds regularly mod_h2 on >> Windows. >> Am 17.10.2023 um 11:30 schrieb Steffen : >>> >>> Same error on win64. >>> Yes the reported mod_http2 errors on 32 and 64. >>> Yes, I am not able to tell what is wrong, only I can report the errors. I >>> am not a developer, just building and testing. >>> >>> Regards, Steffen >>> Op 17 okt 2023 om 11:08 heeft Stefan Eissing via dev het volgende geschreven: > Am 17.10.2023 um 08:41 schrieb Steffen : > > -1 does not build on windows. If I understood your reports from yesterday correctly, the situation is - you can build on win64 - you get compiler errors on your win32 build - you are not able to tell us what is wrong Correct? Cheers, Stefan > > Steffen > >>> Op 16 okt 2023 om 17:10 heeft Stefan Eissing via dev >>> het volgende geschreven: >> >> Hi all, >> >> after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again: >> >> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ >> >> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release >> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as 2.4.58: >> [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! >> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. >> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. >> >> The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: >> sha256: 503a7da4a4a27fd496037998b17078dc9fe004db32c657c96cce8356b8aa2eb6 >> *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz >> sha512: >> 5c11faf0572035ef67b27775d975999411c689cb774553175299a9e99b63d3d7138b0c7f15048ec28038494d8513689f916202c2289d557947d8b190d46ca9f3 >> *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz >> >> The SVN candidate source is found at tags/2.4.58-rc3-candidate. >> >> Cheers, >> Stefan > >>> >> >
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58
Just got a reply from a contact that build rc3 on win64 and ran it successfully. I invited him to participate here, not sure if he will feel like it. I count that as a +1 on win64 unless someone objects. Cheers, Stefan > Am 17.10.2023 um 12:05 schrieb Stefan Eissing via dev : > > I am trying to contact another person that builds regularly mod_h2 on Windows. > >> Am 17.10.2023 um 11:30 schrieb Steffen : >> >> Same error on win64. >> Yes the reported mod_http2 errors on 32 and 64. >> Yes, I am not able to tell what is wrong, only I can report the errors. I am >> not a developer, just building and testing. >> >> Regards, Steffen >> >>> Op 17 okt 2023 om 11:08 heeft Stefan Eissing via dev >>> het volgende geschreven: >>> >>> >>> Am 17.10.2023 um 08:41 schrieb Steffen : -1 does not build on windows. >>> >>> If I understood your reports from yesterday correctly, the situation is >>> - you can build on win64 >>> - you get compiler errors on your win32 build >>> - you are not able to tell us what is wrong >>> >>> Correct? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Stefan >>> Steffen >> Op 16 okt 2023 om 17:10 heeft Stefan Eissing via dev >> het volgende geschreven: > > Hi all, > > after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again: > > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release > this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as 2.4.58: > [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! > [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. > [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. > > The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: > sha256: 503a7da4a4a27fd496037998b17078dc9fe004db32c657c96cce8356b8aa2eb6 > *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz > sha512: > 5c11faf0572035ef67b27775d975999411c689cb774553175299a9e99b63d3d7138b0c7f15048ec28038494d8513689f916202c2289d557947d8b190d46ca9f3 > *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz > > The SVN candidate source is found at tags/2.4.58-rc3-candidate. > > Cheers, > Stefan >>> >> >
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 11:10 AM Stefan Eissing via dev wrote: > > Hi all, > > after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again: > > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release > this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as 2.4.58: > [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! > [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. > [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. > > The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: > sha256: 503a7da4a4a27fd496037998b17078dc9fe004db32c657c96cce8356b8aa2eb6 > *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz > sha512: > 5c11faf0572035ef67b27775d975999411c689cb774553175299a9e99b63d3d7138b0c7f15048ec28038494d8513689f916202c2289d557947d8b190d46ca9f3 > *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz > > The SVN candidate source is found at tags/2.4.58-rc3-candidate. +1 AIX/xlc
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58
I think William Rowe can help. He is the guy who helped a lot with windows. > Op 17 okt 2023 om 12:05 heeft Stefan Eissing via dev > het volgende geschreven: > > I am trying to contact another person that builds regularly mod_h2 on > Windows. > >> Am 17.10.2023 um 11:30 schrieb Steffen : >> >> Same error on win64. >> Yes the reported mod_http2 errors on 32 and 64. >> Yes, I am not able to tell what is wrong, only I can report the errors. I am >> not a developer, just building and testing. >> >> Regards, Steffen >> Op 17 okt 2023 om 11:08 heeft Stefan Eissing via dev het volgende geschreven: >>> >>> >>> Am 17.10.2023 um 08:41 schrieb Steffen : -1 does not build on windows. >>> >>> If I understood your reports from yesterday correctly, the situation is >>> - you can build on win64 >>> - you get compiler errors on your win32 build >>> - you are not able to tell us what is wrong >>> >>> Correct? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Stefan >>> Steffen >> Op 16 okt 2023 om 17:10 heeft Stefan Eissing via dev >> het volgende geschreven: > > Hi all, > > after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again: > > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release > this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as 2.4.58: > [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! > [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. > [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. > > The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: > sha256: 503a7da4a4a27fd496037998b17078dc9fe004db32c657c96cce8356b8aa2eb6 > *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz > sha512: > 5c11faf0572035ef67b27775d975999411c689cb774553175299a9e99b63d3d7138b0c7f15048ec28038494d8513689f916202c2289d557947d8b190d46ca9f3 > *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz > > The SVN candidate source is found at tags/2.4.58-rc3-candidate. > > Cheers, > Stefan >>> >> >
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58
I am trying to contact another person that builds regularly mod_h2 on Windows. > Am 17.10.2023 um 11:30 schrieb Steffen : > > Same error on win64. > Yes the reported mod_http2 errors on 32 and 64. > Yes, I am not able to tell what is wrong, only I can report the errors. I am > not a developer, just building and testing. > > Regards, Steffen > >> Op 17 okt 2023 om 11:08 heeft Stefan Eissing via dev >> het volgende geschreven: >> >> >> >>> Am 17.10.2023 um 08:41 schrieb Steffen : >>> >>> -1 does not build on windows. >> >> If I understood your reports from yesterday correctly, the situation is >> - you can build on win64 >> - you get compiler errors on your win32 build >> - you are not able to tell us what is wrong >> >> Correct? >> >> Cheers, >> Stefan >> >>> >>> Steffen >>> > Op 16 okt 2023 om 17:10 heeft Stefan Eissing via dev > het volgende geschreven: Hi all, after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again: Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as 2.4.58: [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: sha256: 503a7da4a4a27fd496037998b17078dc9fe004db32c657c96cce8356b8aa2eb6 *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz sha512: 5c11faf0572035ef67b27775d975999411c689cb774553175299a9e99b63d3d7138b0c7f15048ec28038494d8513689f916202c2289d557947d8b190d46ca9f3 *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz The SVN candidate source is found at tags/2.4.58-rc3-candidate. Cheers, Stefan >>> >> >
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58
> Am 16.10.2023 um 17:08 schrieb Stefan Eissing via dev : > > Hi all, > > after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again: > > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release > this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as 2.4.58: > [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! > [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. > [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. > > The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: > sha256: 503a7da4a4a27fd496037998b17078dc9fe004db32c657c96cce8356b8aa2eb6 > *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz > sha512: > 5c11faf0572035ef67b27775d975999411c689cb774553175299a9e99b63d3d7138b0c7f15048ec28038494d8513689f916202c2289d557947d8b190d46ca9f3 > *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz > > The SVN candidate source is found at tags/2.4.58-rc3-candidate. > > Cheers, > Stefan +1 on macOS Ventura 13.5.2 - Stefan
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58
Same error on win64. Yes the reported mod_http2 errors on 32 and 64. Yes, I am not able to tell what is wrong, only I can report the errors. I am not a developer, just building and testing. Regards, Steffen > Op 17 okt 2023 om 11:08 heeft Stefan Eissing via dev > het volgende geschreven: > > > >> Am 17.10.2023 um 08:41 schrieb Steffen : >> >> -1 does not build on windows. > > If I understood your reports from yesterday correctly, the situation is > - you can build on win64 > - you get compiler errors on your win32 build > - you are not able to tell us what is wrong > > Correct? > > Cheers, > Stefan > >> >> Steffen >> Op 16 okt 2023 om 17:10 heeft Stefan Eissing via dev het volgende geschreven: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again: >>> >>> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: >>> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ >>> >>> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release >>> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as 2.4.58: >>> [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! >>> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. >>> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. >>> >>> The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: >>> sha256: 503a7da4a4a27fd496037998b17078dc9fe004db32c657c96cce8356b8aa2eb6 >>> *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz >>> sha512: >>> 5c11faf0572035ef67b27775d975999411c689cb774553175299a9e99b63d3d7138b0c7f15048ec28038494d8513689f916202c2289d557947d8b190d46ca9f3 >>> *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz >>> >>> The SVN candidate source is found at tags/2.4.58-rc3-candidate. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Stefan >> >
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58
> Am 17.10.2023 um 08:41 schrieb Steffen : > > -1 does not build on windows. If I understood your reports from yesterday correctly, the situation is - you can build on win64 - you get compiler errors on your win32 build - you are not able to tell us what is wrong Correct? Cheers, Stefan > > Steffen > >> Op 16 okt 2023 om 17:10 heeft Stefan Eissing via dev >> het volgende geschreven: >> >> Hi all, >> >> after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again: >> >> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ >> >> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release >> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as 2.4.58: >> [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! >> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. >> [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. >> >> The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: >> sha256: 503a7da4a4a27fd496037998b17078dc9fe004db32c657c96cce8356b8aa2eb6 >> *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz >> sha512: >> 5c11faf0572035ef67b27775d975999411c689cb774553175299a9e99b63d3d7138b0c7f15048ec28038494d8513689f916202c2289d557947d8b190d46ca9f3 >> *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz >> >> The SVN candidate source is found at tags/2.4.58-rc3-candidate. >> >> Cheers, >> Stefan >
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58
-1 does not build on windows. Steffen > Op 16 okt 2023 om 17:10 heeft Stefan Eissing via dev > het volgende geschreven: > > Hi all, > > after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again: > > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release > this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as 2.4.58: > [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! > [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. > [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. > > The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: > sha256: 503a7da4a4a27fd496037998b17078dc9fe004db32c657c96cce8356b8aa2eb6 > *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz > sha512: > 5c11faf0572035ef67b27775d975999411c689cb774553175299a9e99b63d3d7138b0c7f15048ec28038494d8513689f916202c2289d557947d8b190d46ca9f3 > *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz > > The SVN candidate source is found at tags/2.4.58-rc3-candidate. > > Cheers, > Stefan
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58
On 10/16/23 17:08, Stefan Eissing via dev wrote: Hi all, after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again: Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as 2.4.58: [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: sha256: 503a7da4a4a27fd496037998b17078dc9fe004db32c657c96cce8356b8aa2eb6 *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz sha512: 5c11faf0572035ef67b27775d975999411c689cb774553175299a9e99b63d3d7138b0c7f15048ec28038494d8513689f916202c2289d557947d8b190d46ca9f3 *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz The SVN candidate source is found at tags/2.4.58-rc3-candidate. +1 builds and works fine on OpenBSD 7.4 and Fedora 38. Thanks for the RM. Giovanni OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58
+1 Built/tested on: CentOS 6 CentOS 7 AlmaLinux 9 Ubuntu 20.04 Ubuntu 22.04 Regards, Cory McIntire | Lead – cPanel Application Security Team | Release Manager – EasyApache cory.mcint...@webpros.com<mailto:cory.mcint...@webpros.com> | cPanel – a webpros company From: Stefan Eissing via dev Date: Monday, October 16, 2023 at 10:08 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Cc: Stefan Eissing Subject: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58 Hi all, after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again: Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Fhttpd%2F=05%7C01%7Ccory%40cpanel.net%7Ce5c41228d1ce4a24971208dbce59cb59%7Cf8497356a834406086b6d4b1d8059ee0%7C0%7C0%7C638330657304238920%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C=Hvd0FLQKHpx%2F4%2Flfj2iYh2mCcE4jNevfMZDL0piuolQ%3D=0<https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as 2.4.58: [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: sha256: 503a7da4a4a27fd496037998b17078dc9fe004db32c657c96cce8356b8aa2eb6 *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz sha512: 5c11faf0572035ef67b27775d975999411c689cb774553175299a9e99b63d3d7138b0c7f15048ec28038494d8513689f916202c2289d557947d8b190d46ca9f3 *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz The SVN candidate source is found at tags/2.4.58-rc3-candidate. Cheers, Stefan
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58
+1 for me, Slackware64 15.0. Thanks for the RM, yes. On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 11:43 AM Joe Orton wrote: > On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 05:08:11PM +0200, Stefan Eissing via dev wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again: > > > > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release > > this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as 2.4.58: > > [X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! > > [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. > > [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. > > +1 for release from me, sigs good; builds and passes tests on Fedora 39 > and RHEL 8 and 9, my old computers are happy again ;) > > Big thanks for fixes and RMing. > > Regards, Joe > >
Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 05:08:11PM +0200, Stefan Eissing via dev wrote: > Hi all, > > after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again: > > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release > this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as 2.4.58: > [X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! > [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. > [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. +1 for release from me, sigs good; builds and passes tests on Fedora 39 and RHEL 8 and 9, my old computers are happy again ;) Big thanks for fixes and RMing. Regards, Joe
[VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58
Hi all, after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again: Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as 2.4.58: [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: sha256: 503a7da4a4a27fd496037998b17078dc9fe004db32c657c96cce8356b8aa2eb6 *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz sha512: 5c11faf0572035ef67b27775d975999411c689cb774553175299a9e99b63d3d7138b0c7f15048ec28038494d8513689f916202c2289d557947d8b190d46ca9f3 *httpd-2.4.58-rc3.tar.gz The SVN candidate source is found at tags/2.4.58-rc3-candidate. Cheers, Stefan
