Aaron Bannert wrote:
As I pointed out in my message *and* on irc where we were just having
this discussion, there is no way to let --prefix override the layout
with autoconf in a way that is guaranteed to work across versions
of autoconf, at least as far as I can see
Am I being especially
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 01:06:21PM -0500, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Am I being especially thick to-day? If the layout is processed
earlier in configure than the other arguments, why doesn't that
solve the problem? I wasn't aware of any parallelisation done
by configure :-)
autoconf
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 01:06:21PM -0500, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
As I pointed out in my message *and* on irc where we were just having
this discussion, there is no way to let --prefix override the layout
with autoconf in a way that is guaranteed to work across versions
of autoconf,
* Rodent of Unusual Size ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
Aaron Bannert wrote:
As I pointed out in my message *and* on irc where we were just having
this discussion, there is no way to let --prefix override the layout
with autoconf in a way that is guaranteed to work across versions
of
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 12:21:41AM +, Thom May wrote:
As promised:
Index: acinclude.m4
===
RCS file: /home/cvspublic/httpd-2.0/acinclude.m4,v
retrieving revision 1.110
diff -u -u -r1.110 acinclude.m4
--- acinclude.m4
* Aaron Bannert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 12:29:49AM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
I think as I pointed out in IRC, we need to pass all of the
--libdir, etc flags to APR/apr-util/pcre as well. I don't think
does this. Can you please resumbit with a patch that
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 07:07:07PM -0800, Aaron Bannert wrote:
I don't think we want to have to do /configure --prefix=/foo
--datadir='${prefix}' --sysconfdir=conf every time we configure
Apache just to get the paths we're used to, so I'm hoping someone can
provide some insight At this point
There's a little catch-22 that we're running into in trying to
get --enable-layout to work. I have a patch that seems to fix
--enable-layout again, but there is a potential problem:
If one specifies --enable-layout=foo then that layout profile
will completely override other settings like
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 11:47:42AM -0800, Aaron Bannert wrote:
Are we content with --enable-layout potentially overwriting all
--prefix -like parameters?
I'm not. I think any argument specified on the command-line (such
as --prefix) should override the specified layout. It worked like
this
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 03:52:32PM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 11:47:42AM -0800, Aaron Bannert wrote:
Are we content with --enable-layout potentially overwriting all
--prefix -like parameters?
I'm not. I think any argument specified on the command-line (such
* Aaron Bannert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 03:52:32PM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 11:47:42AM -0800, Aaron Bannert wrote:
Are we content with --enable-layout potentially overwriting all
--prefix -like parameters?
I'm not. I think
11 matches
Mail list logo
