Re: 2.0.48 pre4

2003-10-15 Thread Günter Knauf
Hi, what's about the 2.0.48 release? builds for NetWare and Win32, and seems to work fine; no stress tests done yet... Guenter. Thom May wrote: +1 from Linux: prefork/perchild/threadpool/worker all build prefork/worker both work fine in production environments. The new

Re: 2.0.48 pre4

2003-10-15 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 01:13 PM 10/15/2003, Günter Knauf wrote: Hi, what's about the 2.0.48 release? builds for NetWare and Win32, and seems to work fine; no stress tests done yet... I'd like to see this drop on Sunday - I'm working on the Win32 installer issues as I'm writing this, and will be available that

2.0.48 pre4

2003-10-09 Thread Thom May
+1 from Linux: prefork/perchild/threadpool/worker all build prefork/worker both work fine in production environments.

Re: 2.0.48 pre4

2003-10-09 Thread Jeff Trawick
Thom May wrote: +1 from Linux: prefork/perchild/threadpool/worker all build prefork/worker both work fine in production environments. +1 from me after testing worker on AIX 4.3.3, AIX 5.1, Solaris 8, HP-UX 11i, and Linux (UL 1.0), and refreshing my memory re: diffs between

Re: 2.0.48 pre4

2003-10-09 Thread gregames
Thom May wrote: +1 from Linux: prefork/perchild/threadpool/worker all build prefork/worker both work fine in production environments. The new httpd is looking good on www.apache.org (minotaur) since 09-Oct-2003 15:08:33 PDT. A few minutes before this, we had about a one minute