Re: CHANGES file for 1.3 and 2.x

2007-05-18 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On 5/7/07, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Seems to me that the more we work on the various 2.x trees (2.0.x, 2.2.x and trunk), the harder it becomes to get the various correct CHANGES entries in sync... For example, the CHANGES for 2.2 and trunk just refer to changes up to 2.0.56...

CHANGES file for 1.3 and 2.x

2007-05-07 Thread Jim Jagielski
Seems to me that the more we work on the various 2.x trees (2.0.x, 2.2.x and trunk), the harder it becomes to get the various correct CHANGES entries in sync... For example, the CHANGES for 2.2 and trunk just refer to changes up to 2.0.56... What's the best way of syncing these? Should we stop

Re: CHANGES file for 1.3 and 2.x

2007-05-07 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 05/07/2007 05:38 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Seems to me that the more we work on the various 2.x trees (2.0.x, 2.2.x and trunk), the harder it becomes to get the various correct CHANGES entries in sync... For example, the CHANGES for 2.2 and trunk just refer to changes up to 2.0.56...