Re: FYI: build status of AIX 2.4.10

2014-08-02 Thread Michael Felt
Thanks. I thought I had already done that - but there is a slight difference with: $ ./configure --enable-layout=AIX --with-apr=/opt/bin/apr-1-config --with-apr-util=/opt/bin/apu-1-config --enable-mpms-shared=all --enable-mods-shared=all --disable-lua Thanks. And I may even try maintainer-mode

FYI: build status of AIX 2.4.10

2014-08-01 Thread Michael Felt
All was looking normal (I will make a small patch for the buildaix.ksh script to increase the value for MAXMEM) - however, at the end there is an error (when installing to a DESTDIR). build ends with: find: bad status-- /var/tmp/root/httpd.2.4.10/opt/httpd/libexec/mod_mpm_worker.so install: File

Re: FYI: build status of AIX 2.4.10

2014-08-01 Thread Michael Felt
ran # sh -x /var/apr/build-1/libtool --mode=install install mod_mpm_worker.la /var/tmp/root/httpd.2.4.10/opt/httpd/libexec/ got: ... + func_mode_install mod_mpm_worker.la /var/tmp/root/httpd.2.4.10/opt/httpd/libexec/ libtool: install: `mod_mpm_worker.la' is not a valid libtool archive libtool:

Re: FYI: build status of AIX 2.4.10

2014-08-01 Thread Michael Felt
ran same command again, but rather that sh -x, used option --debug This is what I get from func_mode_install - where it fails above. + func_mode_install mod_mpm_worker.la /var/tmp/root/httpd.2.4.10/opt/httpd/libexec/ + test install = /bin/sh + test install = /bin/sh + false + install_prog= +

Re: FYI: build status of AIX 2.4.10

2014-08-01 Thread Michael Felt
correction: I did not pay attention to the .. in the symbolic name. It does reference the file correctly. On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Michael Felt mamf...@gmail.com wrote: ran same command again, but rather that sh -x, used option --debug This is what I get from func_mode_install - where

Re: FYI: build status of AIX 2.4.10

2014-08-01 Thread Michael Felt
the good news: user error. I had removed coreutils so I was relying on the default /usr/bin/install program. Once replaced with coreutils install program everything worked as expected. So, back to FYI only for the compile warnings. (Or, a storm in my glass of water) On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 1:41

Re: FYI: build status of AIX 2.4.10

2014-08-01 Thread Michael Felt
btw: I ran (as best I could) ApacheTest against 2.4.10. On the one hand, all tests it did passed, but it skipped several, which surprises me somewhat - because I thought I had all mods enabled in the build. tail... t/security/CVE-2009-1890skipped all skipped: cannot find

Re: FYI: build status of AIX 2.4.10

2014-08-01 Thread Eric Covener
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Michael Felt mamf...@gmail.com wrote: btw: I ran (as best I could) ApacheTest against 2.4.10. On the one hand, all tests it did passed, but it skipped several, which surprises me somewhat - because I thought I had all mods enabled in the build. The test suite

Re: FYI: build status of AIX 2.4.10

2014-08-01 Thread Rainer Jung
Am 01.08.2014 um 18:44 schrieb Eric Covener: On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Michael Felt mamf...@gmail.com wrote: btw: I ran (as best I could) ApacheTest against 2.4.10. On the one hand, all tests it did passed, but it skipped several, which surprises me somewhat - because I thought I had all