The OSS-Fuzz PR is now ready and should be merged in soon
https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/pull/6044
Following this I will look to put more efforts into it to get better coverage.
If anyone wants their email attached to the project as well to see bug reports
then please let me know and I
On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 at 18:12, Paul Querna wrote:
> Years ago I started hacking on an "mpm fuzz":
> https://github.com/pquerna/httpd/compare/trunk...pquerna:mpm_fuzz
>
> The idea was to make a "fake" MPM, which could feed data from AFL directly
> into the network filter stack, in a super
Years ago I started hacking on an "mpm fuzz":
https://github.com/pquerna/httpd/compare/trunk...pquerna:mpm_fuzz
The idea was to make a "fake" MPM, which could feed data from AFL directly
into the network filter stack, in a super efficient way.
I don't know if it is really a great idea, since TLS
Sure!
> Am 26.07.2021 um 15:03 schrieb david korczynski :
>
> Eric and Stefan, are you okay with me proceeding with the fuzzing
> integration (https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/pull/6044) and putting
> your emails in as recipients of bug reports? I will also put my own
> email in and we can add
works for me
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 9:04 AM david korczynski wrote:
>
> Eric and Stefan, are you okay with me proceeding with the fuzzing
> integration (https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/pull/6044) and putting
> your emails in as recipients of bug reports? I will also put my own
> email in and
Hi David,
Please subscribe me too.
Regards;
Yann.
On Monday, July 26, 2021, david korczynski wrote:
> Eric and Stefan, are you okay with me proceeding with the fuzzing
> integration (https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/pull/6044) and putting
> your emails in as recipients of bug reports? I
Eric and Stefan, are you okay with me proceeding with the fuzzing
integration (https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/pull/6044) and putting
your emails in as recipients of bug reports? I will also put my own
email in and we can add more contacts at any point too. We could then
get the fuzzing
I am happy to put in efforts in getting the coverage up. If I do not
succeed in getting coverage up to a decent amount then I am okay with
that personally.
On 19/07/2021 15:27, Eric Covener wrote:
I am in favour of getting our server into a regular fuzzing setup
and would subscribe to such
> I am in favour of getting our server into a regular fuzzing setup
> and would subscribe to such reports with my google mail. Thanks for
> bringing this to the team and your efforts.
>
> Perhaps other people here can voice their opinion as well? It would
> not work as well, if I am the only one
David,
> Am 16.07.2021 um 12:57 schrieb david korczynski :
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have been working on getting fuzzing into Apache httpd and it would be
> great to have it set up with OSS-Fuzz. OSS-Fuzz is a free service run by
> Google that will continuously run fuzzers and the service is
>
Hi all,
I have been working on getting fuzzing into Apache httpd and it would be
great to have it set up with OSS-Fuzz. OSS-Fuzz is a free service run by
Google that will continuously run fuzzers and the service is
administrered on github (https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz).
Apache-commons is
11 matches
Mail list logo
