On 27 Nov 2011, at 17:14, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Yes, that would be a good idea and I agree with Daniel that we should use a
distinct prefix or format. We currently have around 2700 calls to
*_log_?error in trunk, so a 4-digit number should be ok. Together with for
example AH as prefix for
On Wednesday 30 November 2011, Tim Bannister wrote:
On 27 Nov 2011, at 17:14, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Yes, that would be a good idea and I agree with Daniel that we
should use a distinct prefix or format. We currently have around
2700 calls to *_log_?error in trunk, so a 4-digit number should
On 11/27/2011 8:34 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
At Apachecon several of us were discussing how error messages could be made
more helpful without making them paragraphs. Two suggestions were made - adding
a URL to the message or adding a number/code to each error that would then be
looked up for more
On Tuesday 29 November 2011, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 11/27/2011 8:34 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
At Apachecon several of us were discussing how error messages
could be made more helpful without making them paragraphs. Two
suggestions were made - adding a URL to the message or adding a
Am 27.11.2011 18:14, schrieb Stefan Fritsch:
Yes, that would be a good idea and I agree with Daniel that we should
use a distinct prefix or format. We currently have around 2700 calls
to *_log_?error in trunk, so a 4-digit number should be ok. Together
with for example AH as prefix for Apache
On 27.11.2011 12:14, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Yes, that would be a good idea and I agree with Daniel that we should
use a distinct prefix or format. We currently have around 2700 calls
to *_log_?error in trunk, so a 4-digit number should be ok. Together
with for example AH as prefix for Apache
At Apachecon several of us were discussing how error messages could be made
more helpful without making them paragraphs. Two suggestions were made - adding
a URL to the message or adding a number/code to each error that would then be
looked up for more information.
Any thoughts on 1) the
On 11/27/2011 8:34 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
At Apachecon several of us were discussing how error messages could be made
more helpful without making them paragraphs. Two suggestions were made -
adding a URL to the message or adding a number/code to each error that would
then be looked up for
On Sunday 27 November 2011, Rich Bowen wrote:
At Apachecon several of us were discussing how error messages could
be made more helpful without making them paragraphs. Two
suggestions were made - adding a URL to the message or adding a
number/code to each error that would then be looked up for
On Nov 27, 2011, at 12:14, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote:
Yes, that would be a good idea and I agree with Daniel that we should
use a distinct prefix or format. We currently have around 2700 calls
to *_log_?error in trunk, so a 4-digit number should be ok. Together
with for
On Nov 27, 2011, at 12:58, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote:
Thanks for the suggestion of the odd format. That seems very reasonable.
Clearly I need to stop writing email on my phone. The CODE format.
11 matches
Mail list logo
