On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, [ISO-8859-15] André Malo wrote:
> * Paul Querna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (chop)
> > Using the Source File name seems completely non-intuitive to me.
Agreed.
> I'm rather for removing the whole crap from the default config and simplifiy
> as much as possible.
I'd be caut
At 01:30 PM 9/14/2004, Joshua Slive wrote:
>On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>>I'm trying to understand what other anomalies you mean between
>>Unix and Win32, they aren't that dis-similar.
>
>I was mainly refering to the big block of mpm-control directives near the top.
>
>But I l
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I'm trying to understand what other anomalies you mean between
Unix and Win32, they aren't that dis-similar.
I was mainly refering to the big block of mpm-control directives near the
top.
But I like the suggestion of getting rid of almost all of th
At 10:21 AM 9/14/2004, Joshua Slive wrote:
>On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, [ISO-8859-15] André Malo wrote:
>>A >30 KB default config, which nobody outside this circle here
>>really understands, isn't helpful - especially for beginners.
>
>I agree that the current config file is too big and ugly. But let's
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, Manoj Kasichainula wrote:
How about separating the "example" and "default" configs? Make the default
config short, but provide an example config with all the meat that can be
easily cut-and-pasted.
Or put richer examples in the docs. We have been working on that a
little.
On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 11:21:15AM -0400, Joshua Slive wrote:
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, [ISO-8859-15] André Malo wrote:
A >30 KB default config, which nobody outside this circle here
really understands, isn't helpful - especially for beginners.
I agree that the current config file is too big and ugly.
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004, [ISO-8859-15] André Malo wrote:
A >30 KB default config, which nobody outside this circle here
really understands, isn't helpful - especially for beginners.
I agree that the current config file is too big and ugly. But let's be a
little careful here. There needs to be a bala
On Tue, 2004-09-14 at 08:14 +0200, Andrà Malo wrote:
> I'm rather for removing the whole crap from the default config and simplifiy
> as much as possible.
>
> A >30 KB default config, which nobody outside this circle here
> really understands, isn't helpful - especially for beginners.
+1
* Paul Querna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A couple months the IfModule block was modified so that it can use
> foo_module instead of the Source File name (ie foo.c).
>
> I believe that using the ${name}_module syntax is clearer than using the
> source file name. I would like to encourage using
